This month, TCP named the room. TAIIP named the race. This essay is for whoever finds themselves in the gap between the two — the person running the amendment review who doesn’t know what question to add to the checklist, the compressed seat whose sustaining review just found something the dashboard didn’t surface, the executive who read both essays and is now wondering what their organization should actually do differently.
The answer isn’t a new governance framework. It’s a set of questions that should already be in the process — and aren’t yet — plus a way to think about the vendor relationships you already have before the next update arrives.
Principle 1: The Back Door Has a Shape — Learn to Recognize It
The entry mechanisms TCP described — a legal amendment, a platform expansion, a bundled subscription update — share a structural signature. They arrive as enhancements to existing relationships, not as new vendor or alliance partner decisions. They route to reviewers optimized for scope and relationship continuity, not operational downstream impact. And they carry AI agent capabilities inside packaging that looks like a routine update.
That signature is recognizable before you sign, if you know what to look for.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.