Monday’s episode with Adam Foroughi, Co-Founder & CEO @ AppLovin:
Download the full transcript:
My 6 key takeaways:
Are People Ready for the AI Future That Is Within Every Company?
True AI integration requires a massive “leveling up” of talent. Companies must be honest about the path forward: keeping employees who fail to adopt AI creates a “blockade” to reaching a truly AI-native state. Consequently, we should expect continued tech layoffs as organizations prioritize efficiency over legacy headcount.
Biggest Advice on Token Budgeting and Token Maxing?
Treating tokens as a simple budget or leaderboard is “flawed logic”. If you incentivize raw usage, teams will simply create high-volume “crap” that burns capital without driving revenue. Instead, optimize for specific KPIs where token consumption aligns directly with business growth; when revenue is on the other side, the “budget” mindset disappears.
Can You Have a Team Full of Only A Players?
An organization cannot thrive if A players are surrounded by B, C, or D players. AppLovin slimmed its HR department from 80 people to 15 by retaining only “doers” who don’t get bogged down in the process. The goal is a lean culture of individual contributors who want to make a difference without needing heavy management layers.
Do the Majority of Company Teams Need to Be Rebuilt for the Technology We Have Today?
If a role is likely to be automated, or if a department is too slow to adopt AI, it is time to rebuild that organization from the ground up. Foroughi cut staff by 40-50% in most departments during a year of triple-digit growth to force the organization into an automated, efficient state.
Why Investors Need to Give Ceos Better Comp Packages
Founders take massive risks to build something out of nothing, and they need continued upside to stay mentally motivated. If a CEO is expected to work without performance-based incentives, they may drift toward new ventures rather than staying committed to the “lonely, stressful” task of scaling a public company.
Why This $160 Billion Company Does Not Have Any Learning and Development
Structured L&D is often disconnected from the reality of high-performance work. The best employees are curious enough to figure things out on their own. By documenting all communication in transcripts and chats, new hires can use AI models to summarize tribal knowledge and develop themselves more effectively than any formal training program.
Thursday’s episode with Rory O’Driscoll, GP @ Scale, Jason Lemkin, Founder @ SaaStr:
Download the full transcript:
My 6 key takeaways:
Why does Dario at Anthropic have such a hard job predicting the compute demands?
The capital intensity of building an AI leader is unprecedented; every $1 of run-rate revenue requires approximately $4 to $5 of CapEx to support it. A CEO must forecast demand two years in advance, which is incredibly risky. Underestimating demand leaves you with insufficient compute to serve users, while overestimating it results in billions of dollars in “stranded capacity”.
What the public markets are getting wrong about the SaaS-pocalypse
The market currently believes specific coding vibes or models are the primary threat, but the true danger is what AI agents decide to pick. Agents will ultimately choose the vendors and LLMs for most workflows, rendering tools like project management software useless because agents have no need for them. Companies like OpenAI are racing to win the “agent wars” to ensure their APIs are the default choice for these autonomous systems.
Why Google is a mega-buy on the back of the Anthropic investment
Google is positioned as a primary winner because it benefits whether users choose Gemini or Anthropic. They possess “infinite capacity” compared to other players, allowing them to route compute surplus between their own needs and their various customers. This massive cash flow and infrastructure flexibility make them a “win-win-win” in the current AI arms race.
Multi-year contracts don’t matter. Deferred churn is still churn.
Multi-year contracts are often a place where “mediocre” management hides to mask underlying business problems. While a customer might be locked into an eight-year cycle through standard upfront terms and renewals, they are essentially just taking that time to find a better enterprise solution. If a customer eventually leaves, the churn was merely deferred, and the terminal value of the company remains impacted.
What happens to the distributions from Manus? Do the investors have to give the money back?
When a regulatory body like China attempts to “unwind” an acquisition like Meta’s purchase of Manus, there is a near-zero chance that venture investors will return the capital already distributed. The real pressure point is on the acquiring corporation and the technology itself, rather than the VC funds. Such rulings are primarily designed to prevent similar deals from occurring in the future.
The two great wars that no one is talking about
Two subtle but massive “battles” are currently unfolding: the US vs. China AI war and the resulting social dislocation. We are seeing a rise in “social unrest” expressed through billionaire taxes and penthouses taxes as layoffs from AI automation begin to impact the workforce. These themes of geopolitical competition and internal inequality will be the defining political stories of the decade.
Saturday’s episode with Becca Lindquist, Head of Sales @ Clay:
Download the full transcript:
Let us know what your big takeaways from this week’s shows were in the comments below!
Thank you for reading, and don’t miss the great guests we have next week:
Monday episode: Tobias Lütke, CEO @ Shopify
Thursday episode: Jason Lemkin & Rory O’Driscoll
Saturday episode: Cliff Weitzman, Founder & CEO @ Speechify
Thank you for reading 20VC.
This post is public so feel free to share it.
Thanks for reading 20VC! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.