Primary Night Breakdown

Listen on Spotify | Listen on Apple | Listen on iHeartMedia | Listen on Amazon

Marcus and Madeline are still running on coffee and primary night results, and they’ve got a lot to say about what actually happened — and what the media is getting wrong about it.

They open on Michigan, where Abdul El-Sayed edged out Haley Stevens despite being outspent by somewhere in the neighborhood of 11 or 12 to one. Then Wisconsin, where Francesca Hong lost a race the polls had her winning by nine points. The media’s takeaway: DSA versus establishment, civil war in the Democratic Party. Marcus and Madeline’s takeaway: that’s the wrong frame, and the differences between where Democrats sit on the spectrum are far smaller than the difference between any Democrat and Mike Rogers rubber-stamping Trump in the Senate.

Madeline brings the demographic analysis she does as a jury consultant and breaks down why El-Sayed’s race and Hong’s race aren’t actually comparable — different candidates, wildly different spending disparities, and a very different undecided voter picture two weeks out. The through-line she keeps coming back to: undecided voters, in the end, go with the safer-feeling choice. That has implications for November that cut both ways.

The conversation also covers Georgia’s own undecided math — what it means for Ossoff, for Keisha Lance Bottoms, for the governor’s race — and why Madeline thinks what Georgia has quietly been modeling for the country, with candidates whose hearts were always more Democratic than their party registration, is a story that deserves more attention than it’s getting.