
Wait... Isn't BA.3.2 Supposed to Need Covid-19-Vaccinated People?
Who Told BA.3.2 It Wasn't Allowed to Spread There?
Mass infection prevention and mass vaccination with leaky Covid-19 vaccines in the midst of the pandemic can only breed highly infectious variants.
Live Last read · last published · next check

Who Told BA.3.2 It Wasn't Allowed to Spread There?

For several years now, SARS-CoV-2 (SC-2) has continued to evolve despite the remarkable breadth of adaptive immune responses that repeated vaccine-breakthrough infections (VBTIs) have generated in highly Covid-19 (C-19)-vaccinated populations.

Current evolutionary dynamics

Why the Current Viral Evolutionary Dynamics Suggest That SARS-CoV-2 Is Approaching an Evolutionary Phase Transition

Why a Metastable Pandemic Is Unlikely to Drift Quietly Into Endemicity

I recently came through the following preprint: https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.11.731720v1.

Introduction

Recently, I noticed on X that Stefan Pöhlmann, who regularly comments on the currently circulating variants and apparently follows my work, while seemingly paying little attention to what I actually write, posed the following questions (

A new scientific paper suggests that the SARS-CoV-2 (SC-2) sublineage BA.3.2.2 may be spreading more easily in children and that children could become a reservoir from which new variants might emerge (https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.06.05.730251v2.full

Note: right after finishing this version, I’ll post a simplified version of this manuscript for a broader audience