I was working in a coffee shop yesterday. A cluster of girls came in, twelve or thirteen years old, laughing about something they wouldn’t say out loud. They huddled and planned, and I went back to my screen. Ten minutes later, I looked up, and they were out in the parking lot, propping a phone against the curb to hold it steady. Then they danced. It started playfully, the way girls that age are playful, and it did not stay there. Inside a minute, the moves had become something no twelve-year-old should know how to do, aimed at a lens, performed for men none of them would ever meet. I looked back down at my laptop, averting my eyes, because I am a father who has a daughter, and what I saw saddened me. Someone had taught these girls that this is how a girl gets seen. No one had taught them another way.
Clearly, your child is enrolled in a discipleship program. This one meets for ninety minutes a day, it never takes a Sunday off, and you did not sign her up for it. The program is TikTok, and by every metric that matters, it’s winning.
Here is the ledger, and Gallup did the counting. The average American teenager gives TikTok about 90 minutes a day, and close to five hours once you add the other platforms. Ninety minutes a day comes to 540 hours a year on a single app, and five hours a day comes to roughly 1,700 hours annually across all of them. Set that against the same child who sits in church every Sunday and hears, at most, forty minutes of direct teaching, something near thirty-five hours in a year. Forty to one is the generous math; the honest number is far worse.
I learned what those hours do in my own house, the hard way. Tomeka and I saw it coming and held the line on phones longer than almost anyone we knew. None of our three children carried one until after high school. I thought that settled it. While the phones stayed in a drawer, our kids were on the laptops and the family desktop, building followings on YouTube and Instagram I never authorized. The danger was never the phone. It was the formation, and it will use any screen in the house.
You saw what that formation produces out in a parking lot. Here is where it does the work, on a screen in your own house, in the hours you believe are safe. It is one in the morning, and you are asleep. Your daughter is not. Behind her door, there is a soft blue light, and behind that light is something at work on her, learning her and feeding the ache she has not named to you. You are twenty feet away, certain she is safe because she is home. Tonight, the thing behind the glow knows her better than you do.
Understand what that formation does, because it is not a set of ideas your daughter could write on a test. The feed doesn’t argue. It trains what she loves before it reaches what she thinks. What you behold, you become, and the machine is counting on it.
So let’s ask the question no one in the room wants to ask. What is it training her to love?
It’s training her to sell herself. The culture calls that empowerment. The right word is pornographic. I do not mean nudity. I mean immodesty aimed at attention, a girl is taught by the age of twelve that the way to get her needs met is to appeal to a man's base appetite. The feed rewards it on the spot, with numbers she can watch climb, and it calls the whole transaction confidence.
On the other side of the same app, it hands your son an endless stream of what that girl was taught to post. He consumes what she performs, and both of them get the dopamine hit on schedule.
Here is the cruelty in it. The machine profits most when the two of them never actually meet. It teaches a boy to want an image and a girl to become one, until the harder and holier work of looking another person in the face and being known feels unnecessary, even frightening. It sells connection while making both parties unfit for it. That’s not a side effect; it’s the product.
The church often tries to answer a machine like that with a slideshow and better production. A battle lost before it begins, because you cannot out-argue a liturgy with a lecture. Next, it blamed the phones. That too was a failure.
This gap cannot be closed at church, and it was never meant to be. The church gathers a few hours a week by design, and the forming of a child’s loves was handed somewhere else long ago. “You shall teach them diligently to your children, and shall talk of them when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise” (Deuteronomy 6:7). God did not name a program. He named a day, the ordinary hours a household already has, and He gave the forming of children to the home. The church’s deeper failure was leaving that home disarmed while a screen finished the work the dinner table gave up.
What replaces it is not a vague call to family devotions. It meets the two children, the feed is deforming, at the exact point of the wound.
For a daughter, it means being the one man in her life who wants nothing from her. A father gives a girl the attention she is built to need, and he raises a daughter the algorithm cannot starve into performing for strangers. He teaches her that her mind holds a worth the feed will never pay for, and that even her beauty is worth more than the cheap price the algorithm sets on it. He teaches her the thing that the culture has exactly backward. Empowerment is not handing her control away for a moment of attention. It is keeping control, and modesty is how she keeps it.
For a son, it means teaching him that a woman is not a feed. I have told my boys for years that an immodest woman has set her bar for attention so low that no man alive could fill it, so do not be the fool who starts trying. Scripture is not shy about where that road ends. Samson was the strongest man alive, and he handed his secret to the wrong woman and woke up blind. David was the king after God’s own heart, and a single look from a rooftop pulled him into adultery and murder. Solomon was the wisest man who ever lived, and his hunger for women finally turned his heart from God. Strength, devotion, and wisdom, and not one of the three was enough to save a man from a desire he would not govern. A son learns to guard that place from a father who names it out loud, or he learns it too late and alone.
But the deepest lesson a father gives is the one he never has to say. My children watched me love their mother for thirty years, and that taught them more than any lecture I could deliver. What they saw was not a feeling that came and went with the mood. It was a covenant, chosen on purpose and kept on purpose, through the easy years and the ones that were not. That is the thing the feed imitates and can never deliver. Being known by one person who stays.
I am in the empty-nest years now, and I think about grandchildren I can already picture. I do not wonder whether they will master a screen; that’s the easy part. I wonder whether they will look another person in the face and stay interested in the soul across the table. That will be rare in their generation, rare enough that the child who keeps it will be advanced far beyond his peers.
So here is the whole of it. God gave the forming of a child to the home before the first line of code was written, and He did not change His mind when the code got good. You are the counter-liturgy, or there is not one. The machine will make your child seen by millions and known by no one. Only a home can teach a child to be known, and to stay long enough to know someone else. Take back the hours, and give them the one thing the feed can never sell.
Join the Mission — I publish here regularly to give you biblical clarity in a collapsing world. Join the Sola Veritas Inner Circle for deeper engagement, honest conversation, and formation that takes you further. Free keeps you thinking. Paid takes you deeper. Visit the Sola Veritas Store for hoodies, jackets, mugs, and more.

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.