The centre is: the seeker turns life into a means of reaching another moment; autotelic experiencing lets the activity be complete in itself. Awakening goes further—not by creating a permanent flow state, but by revealing that even seeking, boredom, thinking and frustration are already part of THIS and do not need to deliver somewhere else.
Song: Nothing to Get From the River
Daniel had ruined walking.
Not completely.
His legs still worked.
He could still leave the house, follow the path beside the river and return forty minutes later.
But walking had acquired a job.
Years earlier he had walked because he liked walking.
Then he learned it was good for cardiovascular health.
So he walked for his heart.
Then he bought a watch that counted steps.
So he walked for ten thousand.
Then he discovered mindfulness.
So he walked to become present.
Then awakening entered the picture.
After that, walking became very serious.
Was there a walker?
Who was moving the legs?
Could he find a self?
Was seeing happening without a seer?
Could he remain with sensation rather than thought?
Was this direct experiencing?
Was he more identified than yesterday?
A walk along the river could now contain several performance reviews.
One afternoon Clara joined him.
After ten minutes she said, “Are you enjoying this?”
“What?”
“The walk.”
Daniel looked surprised.
“I’m investigating.”
“That wasn’t my question.”
“Yes. I suppose.”
“You suppose?”
“I’m watching thought.”
“There does seem to be plenty of it.”
Daniel ignored that.
They continued.
A pelican floated near the reeds.
Daniel noticed:
white body,
long beak,
water reflecting sunlight.
Then thought appeared:
Seeing without a seer.
Then:
Good. Stay with that.
Then:
Who is staying?
Then:
Don’t make this intellectual.
Clara stopped.
“What?”
“You stopped.”
“Yes.”
“Why?”
“I want to show you something.”
She pointed towards the pelican.
“Look at that.”
“I am.”
“No. Look at the pelican.”
Daniel looked.
“What about it?”
“Nothing.”
They stood there.
The pelican dipped its beak into the water.
Lifted it.
Shook its head.
Drifted several metres.
Daniel waited for Clara’s teaching.
None came.
Finally he said, “What am I supposed to notice?”
Clara laughed.
“That.”
“What?”
“You couldn’t let the pelican be a pelican for thirty seconds. It had to become an awakening exercise.”
Daniel looked back at the water.
“That’s a little unfair.”
“Is it?”
“I’m interested in investigating experience.”
“I know.”
“So what’s wrong with that?”
“Nothing.”
“Then?”
Clara started walking again.
“I wonder whether you remember how to do something that isn’t trying to get you somewhere.”
Later they told Elias.
He was cutting tomatoes at the kitchen bench.
Daniel said, “Apparently I don’t know how to walk.”
“You seem to have arrived.”
“That’s Clara’s accusation.”
Clara opened the refrigerator.
“My accusation is that everything he does has become a means.”
Elias glanced at Daniel.
“A means to what?”
“Awakening.”
Daniel said it reluctantly.
Elias returned to the tomatoes.
“And awakening is for what?”
Daniel frowned.
“Freedom.”
“From?”
“Suffering.”
“And freedom from suffering is for what?”
Daniel became irritated.
“For being okay.”
“And being okay is for what?”
“That’s the end.”
Elias smiled.
“So you’re willing to sacrifice everything before the end in order to reach the end?”
“I’m not sacrificing everything.”
“Did you enjoy the pelican?”
Daniel remembered.
“Not really.”
“What did you do with it?”
“Investigated it.”
“Poor pelican.”
Naomi came in carrying bread.
“What are we talking about?”
“Daniel weaponised a pelican against himself,” Clara said.
“Again?”
“Apparently it’s a recurring problem.”
Daniel sighed.
“I’m trying to wake up.”
Naomi put the bread on the bench.
“And then?”
“What do you mean?”
“What will you do when you wake up?”
Daniel thought.
“Live.”
The room became quiet.
Naomi looked at him.
Daniel heard what he had said.
He laughed once.
Not happily.
“That’s unpleasant.”
Elias nodded.
“You’ve postponed living until awakening.”
Daniel sat at the table.
“That sounds worse when you say it aloud.”
“Most useful things do.”
Elias finished preparing lunch.
Nobody discussed awakening while they ate.
At first Daniel found this difficult.
He kept noticing opportunities.
The taste of tomato.
Direct experiencing.
The sound of a fork.
No hearer.
A decision to reach for bread.
Did he decide?
Every event arrived carrying instructional potential.
Then Clara told a ridiculous story about accidentally waving at someone she thought she knew and discovering that the person was waving at someone behind her.
Daniel laughed.
For perhaps thirty seconds, there was no awakening project.
Just laughter.
Then thought arrived:
Interesting. There was no seeker during the laughter.
Daniel groaned.
“What?” Naomi asked.
“It’s back.”
“What?”
“The one who turns everything into evidence.”
Elias said, “Very efficient employee.”
A few days later, Daniel arrived at Elias’s house carrying a book.
“I found a word.”
“That sounds serious.”
“Autotelic.”
Elias waited.
“It means an activity whose purpose is in the activity itself. Done for its own sake.”
“Like play.”
“Yes.”
“Music.”
“Yes.”
“Walking.”
Daniel gave him a look.
“In principle.”
Elias smiled.
Daniel continued.
“Flow is often like that. You’re not doing the activity mainly to get a later result. The doing itself is enough.”
“That sounds useful.”
“I think it explains what’s gone wrong with seeking.”
“Nothing has gone wrong.”
“You know what I mean.”
“Probably.”
Daniel sat down.
“The seeker makes everything instrumental.”
“Meditation in order to?”
“Wake up.”
“Inquiry in order to?”
“Wake up.”
“Notice thoughts in order to?”
“Stop identifying.”
“Stop identifying in order to?”
“Wake up.”
“Wake up in order to?”
Daniel hesitated.
“Finally live.”
Elias nodded.
“There’s your structure.”
Daniel wrote it on a scrap of paper:
THIS → technique → progress → later → completion
Then underneath:
THIS is insufficient until it produces THAT.
He stared at it.
“This is basically my whole spiritual life.”
That evening Daniel walked alone.
He decided not to investigate.
Immediately thought said:
Good. This will be a practice in not practising.
He laughed.
“Fine.”
He decided not to stop seeking either.
Seeking could come.
The river was there.
Shoes against gravel.
Cool air.
A child cycling past.
Thought:
Am I enjoying this for its own sake?
Another laugh.
The mind could even convert autotelic experience into a goal.
Become autotelic.
Stop using moments as means.
Perfect your ability to be here.
The seeker had found another uniform.
Daniel kept walking.
There was no need to win.
Halfway along the river, he became interested in the movement of sunlight on the water.
Not as an exercise.
It simply caught the eye.
A patch of brightness stretched and broke.
Reformed.
Moved.
There was no thought:
I should pay attention.
Attention was already there.
For perhaps a minute, there was only looking.
Then thought returned:
This is lovely.
Also fine.
Then:
Is this flow?
Fine.
Then:
Could this be awakening?
Daniel smiled.
The thoughts were not ruining anything.
That was new.
Previously, he imagined a pure state in which experience was autotelic because the narrator disappeared.
Now the narrator could speak too.
It was part of the walk.
Thought did not have to be expelled before the activity could be complete.
The walk included thinking.
At the next meeting Daniel announced:
“I think I misunderstood the whole thing.”
Clara smiled.
“Which whole thing?”
“Autotelic experience.”
“Go on.”
“I thought it meant getting into a state where there’s no self-conscious thinking.”
“Flow.”
“Yes. And that can happen. But then I’d just turn flow into another awakening state.”
Elias nodded.
“So?”
“The important thing isn’t whether the narrator goes quiet.”
“What is?”
“Whether this moment is being treated entirely as a means to another one.”
Naomi said, “That’s interesting.”
Daniel continued.
“Even frustration could be complete in itself.”
Clara frowned.
“Explain that carefully.”
“I don’t mean we should enjoy frustration.”
“Good.”
“I mean frustration doesn’t have to justify itself by producing insight.”
“Yes.”
“Boredom doesn’t need to become presence.”
“Yes.”
“Thought doesn’t need to become silence.”
“Yes.”
“Seeking doesn’t even have to become non-seeking.”
Elias smiled.
“There it is.”
Daniel looked pleased.
Then immediately thought:
This may be the breakthrough.
Everyone saw his expression change.
Clara laughed.
“Welcome back.”
A week later Daniel had a terrible afternoon.
Nothing flowed.
He was irritable.
His back hurt.
He lost an email he had been writing.
Bracken knocked over a bowl of water.
Daniel snapped at him.
Then felt guilty.
Thought arrived:
This is the opposite of awakened living.
Another thought followed:
You should accept this experience autotelically.
That made him even angrier.
He phoned Elias.
“I hate autotelic experience.”
“Excellent.”
“I’m serious.”
“What happened?”
Daniel explained.
Elias listened.
Then asked, “What does autotelic experience owe you?”
“What?”
“You’ve turned it into a method.”
Daniel closed his eyes.
Of course.
The bargain had become:
If I stop trying to use experience to get somewhere, experience will become peaceful.
Another transaction.
Another means to an end.
“So what do I do with this?”
“Nothing.”
“That’s very unhelpful.”
“Is irritation here?”
“Yes.”
“Back pain?”
“Yes.”
“Guilt?”
“Yes.”
“Thought telling you this is wrong?”
“Yes.”
“Does any of that need to become autotelic?”
Daniel laughed despite himself.
“No.”
“Then perhaps leave it alone.”
That evening he sat on the floor beside Bracken.
The old dog was sleeping.
Daniel put one hand on his back.
Warm fur.
Breathing.
Thought:
I shouldn’t have snapped at him.
Sadness.
Then an impulse.
Daniel stroked the dog.
“Sorry, mate.”
Bracken opened one eye, then closed it again.
Nothing profound.
But Daniel noticed something.
The apology was not being made to become spiritually better.
He was sorry.
So apology happened.
No future reward required.
This was different from manufacturing an autotelic state.
It was simply action complete in its own movement.
Months later Clara asked him, “Do you still think about that word?”
“Autotelic?”
“Yes.”
“Sometimes.”
“Does walking work now?”
Daniel laughed.
“Sometimes I walk because I want exercise.”
“That’s not autotelic.”
“No. And that’s fine.”
“Sometimes?”
“Sometimes I walk to get somewhere.”
“Terrible.”
“Sometimes I walk because walking feels good.”
“And sometimes?”
“I walk while obsessing about something that happened three years ago.”
Clara smiled.
“So what changed?”
Daniel thought.
“I don’t need every activity to be autotelic.”
“Then why does the idea matter?”
“It showed me the structure of seeking.”
He drew an invisible line through the air.
“Here is never enough because it is being used to purchase later.”
“And awakening?”
Daniel looked towards the river.
“I used to think awakening would finally make life autotelic.”
“And now?”
“Maybe experiencing never had a purpose outside itself.”
Clara raised an eyebrow.
“That sounds philosophical.”
“It is.”
“What is actual?”
Daniel looked.
River.
Wind.
Her face.
The faint ache in his left knee.
A thought about purpose.
Another thought noticing the first.
He smiled.
“This.”
“Purpose?”
“I don’t know.”
“Destination?”
“I don’t know.”
“Enough?”
Daniel laughed.
“That question is already a comparison.”
They kept walking.
Not towards enlightenment.
Towards the café.
They wanted coffee.
That was fine too.
An autotelic activity is undertaken primarily for its own sake.
The activity itself is the reward.
Playing music.
Painting.
Walking.
Gardening.
Solving an interesting problem.
Conversation.
Play.
Flow states often have this quality.
Attention is absorbed in the activity and the usual self-monitoring becomes quieter.
There is an important resonance with awakening.
But they are not the same thing.
1. The seeker is fundamentally future-oriented
Seeking usually has this structure:
I am here.
Awakening is there.
This activity will take me from here to there.
Meditation becomes a vehicle.
Inquiry becomes a vehicle.
Silence becomes a vehicle.
Even suffering becomes material to be processed so awakening can eventually occur.
The current experience is valued according to what it may produce.
THIS becomes currency for buying THAT.
2. Autotelic activity breaks that structure
When an activity is autotelic:
playing is enough.
Walking is enough.
Writing is enough.
The point is not located entirely at the end.
This can temporarily interrupt the seeker’s habitual forward leaning.
There is nothing wrong with goals.
Walking to the shop is naturally instrumental.
Studying for an examination has an outcome.
The problem is not having purposes.
It is when the whole of life becomes preparation for later.
3. Flow can resemble no-self
During flow:
self-commentary may decrease,
time may seem altered,
action feels effortless,
doing and doer may not feel separate.
This can resemble descriptions of awakening.
But flow is a state.
It begins.
It ends.
The narrator returns.
The danger is then to create:
I need to get back into that state.
Flow becomes another object of seeking.
4. Awakening does not require flow
Awakening cannot depend upon maintaining:
absorption,
silence,
ease,
pleasure,
effortlessness.
Because ordinary experiencing includes:
boredom,
confusion,
irritation,
pain,
analysis,
planning,
self-consciousness.
If awakening requires a particular state, then every departure from the state becomes:
I lost it.
That recreates the seeker immediately.
5. Thought does not spoil autotelic experiencing
Imagine playing music.
For ten minutes, no commentary.
Then:
This sounds beautiful.
Has the music stopped being music?
Not necessarily.
Thought is another event.
Likewise, a walk need not become impure because:
Nice afternoon
appears.
The demand for thoughtlessness can turn autotelic activity into another performance.
6. Experiencing may be autotelic in a deeper sense
This is where the idea becomes especially interesting for awakening.
Perhaps experiencing itself is not happening in order to culminate in something else.
Breathing is happening.
Thought is happening.
Walking.
Wanting.
Grieving.
Laughing.
None needs to earn the next moment.
This does not mean life has no practical purposes.
It means the present event does not have to justify its existence by producing a superior future state.
7. The seeker converts everything into currency
Notice:
A peaceful meditation becomes:
Progress.
An anxious meditation becomes:
Failure.
A moment without thought becomes:
Evidence.
A thought storm becomes:
Regression.
A beautiful walk becomes:
I was really present.
Immediately, experiencing is converted into information about the awakening project.
What was complete becomes evidence.
8. Work becomes play through discovery
Inquiry can become autotelic.
Instead of:
I must investigate this contraction so it disappears,
there can be:
What exactly is this contraction?
Instead of:
I must see thought as thought so identification ends,
there can be:
Interesting. Why did that particular thought suddenly seem authoritative?
The difference is subtle.
One investigates for a result.
The other investigates because discovering is interesting.
Play does not mean triviality.
It means the investigation need not continuously justify itself through future success.
9. Do not turn autotelic living into another command
Thought can quickly say:
I should enjoy the process.
I should live in flow.
I must stop wanting outcomes.
Every activity should be complete in itself.
This simply creates a new ideal self.
The autotelic person.
Now washing dishes becomes a test.
Was I sufficiently absorbed?
Was there an ulterior motive?
Was I truly present?
The medicine has become the disease.
10. Seeking itself can be included
This is the more radical movement.
Suppose seeking appears.
Urgency.
Comparison.
Future imagining.
The thought:
I need to wake up.
Does seeking have to be removed before THIS can be complete?
No.
Seeking too is what is happening.
This does not mean deliberately maintaining it.
It means its presence does not exile life into some inferior category.
Even the attempt to reach later happens now.
11. “Enough” can become misleading
We may say:
This moment is enough.
Beautiful pointer.
But enough compared with what?
The mind can turn “enough” into another verdict.
Some moments then feel enough.
Others fail the test.
Perhaps simpler:
This is what is happening.
No evaluation required.
12. Practical goals remain
Awakening does not mean abandoning outcomes.
Cook so there is food.
Work so the bill is paid.
Drive to reach the destination.
Practise piano to improve technique.
Go to the doctor to treat illness.
The relative purpose remains.
The deeper question is whether the whole present moment becomes merely disposable material on the way to its outcome.
There can be purposeful action without psychological postponement.
13. The ordinary activity
Why do important recognitions so often appear during ordinary activities?
Washing dishes.
Walking.
Gardening.
Mowing grass.
Making tea.
Perhaps because for a moment the major project has relaxed.
The activity requires little conceptual effort.
Attention is not straining towards revelation.
All previous investigation is still embodied in the organism.
Then recognition can simply happen.
Not because dishwashing creates awakening.
Because nobody is demanding that dishwashing produce it.
14. Inquiry
Choose something ordinary today.
Do not deliberately make it spiritual.
Walking.
Making tea.
Showering.
Feeding an animal.
Notice whether the activity is being used.
What is it supposed to produce?
Relaxation?
Presence?
Health?
Awakening?
A better self?
No need to eliminate the purpose.
Just notice it.
Then ask:
If this activity never produced an awakening insight, would the activity itself still be here?
Feel the difference between:
I am doing this to arrive
and:
This doing is happening.
Now notice thought.
If commentary appears, include it.
If seeking appears, include it.
Nothing has spoiled the experiment.
Finally:
Is THIS happening for the sake of some later THIS?
Don’t answer philosophically.
Look.
15. Clean Formulation
Autotelic experience loosens the means-to-an-end structure that dominates seeking. An activity becomes complete in its doing rather than valuable only for what it produces later. Awakening is not simply a permanent autotelic or flow state, because thought, boredom, frustration, planning and seeking can all continue. The deeper recognition is that experiencing does not need to reach another experience in order to become valid. Even the seeker’s attempt to get somewhere is already part of THIS.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.