Responses to “A Necessary Critique Of Fontcuberta’s Algorithmic Photography”

Published on chatonsky.net on April 13th: The arguments made by Eldagsen and Astray against Fontcuberta s hypotheses seem to rest on an ontological conservatism that misses the ongoing epistemological revolution. By clinging to a binary distinction between “light” (photography) and “code” (AI), they commit a fundamental category error. They perceive generative AI as an informatics of…