On July 2, 2026, a government agency quietly paid a private operator between $286,000 and $371,000 per unit for two facilities it could have built for $250,000. This is above replacement cost for real estate the operator gets to keep running. That transaction just re-rated an entire class of hard assets and almost nobody on the Street has done the math on the company that owns the a comparable portfolio.
Here’s what the market is missing. A direct competitor sold two buildings for roughly $1.5 billion, netted about $1.1 billion after taxes, and will continue collecting high-margin operating fees on both. Same buildings. Same contracts. They monetized the real estate and kept the income stream. Their stock jumped 8% and an analyst raised the target the next morning.
The company I’ve been holding through its entire run owns five directly comparable assets in exactly the jurisdictions that command the biggest premium, urban, hard-to-replicate, litigation-tested. Apply the competitor’s appraisal-based pricing and those five facilities alone imply $1.7B to $2.2B in value. Despite this shares fell about 4% on the news. No analyst has published the per-unit re-valuation. The catalyst is something that management confirmed on its last two earnings calls, with sale announcements guided for "late Q2 or early Q3 2026" and is sitting in plain sight, unpriced.
I think a signed deal forces the Street to publish the NAV case they've all ignored. I've told you why I believe these sales are about as close to certain as this business gets. Below, I break down the exact per-bed math, the five-facility valuation, and why the stock hasn’t rallied yet.

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.