Harry and co told their “unreasonable” reliance on Gavin Burrows’ withdrawn evidence means there is no limit to how much of their $50m costs ANL can seek.
∙ Paid
Prince Harry and his fellow claimants behaved with such outrageous contempt for legal norms in their case against Associated Newspapers Limited (ANL), the publisher of the Daily Mail, that a judge today decreed there is no limit to how much of the Mail’s £ 34.5 million legal expenses ANL can seek to recover.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to The Royalist to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.