One of the worst things about a long job search is what it eventually does to your confidence.
Most people start out feeling reasonably positive. You know you’re good at what you do, you’ve got years of experience behind you and you’ve probably got plenty of evidence from your career that you’re capable of doing the jobs you’re applying for.
Then you start applying.
You send off ten applications and hear nothing from eight of them. One rejects you within 24 hours and the other invites you to an interview. You do the interview, think it went pretty well, then three days later you get the standard “we’ve decided to proceed with another candidate” email.
So you keep going.
Another ten applications. Another few rejections. Maybe another interview. Maybe you get to the final stage this time and start thinking this could actually be the one.
Then they choose somebody else.
Do that for a couple of months and it’s hardly surprising that you start questioning yourself.
I’ve worked in recruitment for over twenty years and I’ve seen this happen to some incredibly capable people. People who have spent years building successful careers suddenly start wondering whether they’re actually any good because they’re struggling to get through a hiring process.
And the problem is that you’re making that judgement without having access to most of the information.
When you apply for a job and get rejected, you know what you did.
You know what was on your CV. You know what you said in the interview. You know which question you stumbled over and which answer you wish you’d given differently.
What you don’t know is everything else that was happening around you.
Maybe there were 150 applications and the recruiter had to get that down to ten people very quickly.
Maybe somebody internal applied who already knew the business, the systems and the hiring manager.
Maybe another candidate had done almost exactly the same job for one of their competitors.
Maybe the hiring manager originally wanted somebody who could do A, B and C, but halfway through the process decided that D was actually more important.
Maybe the salary budget changed.
Maybe the role was put on hold.
Maybe they interviewed somebody on Tuesday morning who they absolutely loved and everybody after that was effectively competing against them.
I’ve seen versions of all of those things happen.
I’ve also rejected perfectly good candidates.
That’s one of the things I think people outside recruitment understandably struggle with. A rejection doesn’t necessarily mean the recruiter or hiring manager thought you were bad. Sometimes I could have happily hired three of the people I interviewed, but I only had one job.
Two perfectly capable people were still getting rejection emails.
They don’t see that bit.
They just see “Unfortunately, on this occasion...”
This is where I think job searching starts doing real damage to people’s confidence.
When you’re working, you get constant evidence that you’re capable. You solve problems. People ask for your advice. You finish projects. Somebody messages you because they know you’ll know the answer. Even if you’ve got a terrible manager who never tells you you’re doing a good job, there are usually little bits of evidence every week that remind you that you know what you’re doing.
Job searching removes most of that.
Instead, you’re sending applications into systems and waiting for somebody else to decide whether you’re worth speaking to.
And when you don’t hear back, there’s very little information to work with.
So your brain starts supplying its own.
Maybe my CV isn’t good enough.
Maybe I’m too old.
Maybe I’ve been out of work too long.
Maybe my experience isn’t as good as I thought.
Maybe nobody wants somebody at my level anymore.
Some of those things might be worth investigating. I’m not suggesting you should ignore the possibility that your CV needs work or that your interview technique could improve.
But there’s a big difference between saying “something about my job search isn’t working” and saying “I’m not good enough.”
Those are not the same thing.
I’ve seen this happen as well.
At the beginning of a job search, particularly if somebody is still employed, interviews tend to feel much more balanced.
They’re thinking about whether they actually want the job. They’re asking decent questions. They’re assessing the manager. They’re thinking about the culture, the salary, the commute and whether the role is actually a good next move.
After months of rejection, that can change completely.
Now they need this interview to go well.
Instead of having a conversation, they’re trying to give the perfect answer. They start second-guessing themselves. They’re watching the interviewer’s face for a reaction. They finish the interview and spend the next three hours replaying every answer in their head trying to work out where they went wrong.
And ironically, that loss of confidence can start affecting how they come across.
Not because they’ve suddenly become worse at their job, but because they’ve spent three months being repeatedly assessed and rejected with almost no useful explanation as to why.
That’s going to affect people.
Then, while all of this is happening, you open LinkedIn.
Someone has just started an amazing new role.
Someone else has been promoted.
Someone is delighted to announce that they’re joining a company you’ve just been rejected by.
Another person has written a post about how they were approached by a recruiter and three conversations later they’d landed their dream job.
What you don’t normally see is the other stuff.
You don’t see the 73 applications before they got that job. You don’t see the three final-stage rejections. You don’t see them sitting at home wondering whether they’d made a massive mistake leaving their previous company.
You just see the announcement at the end.
And if your own job search isn’t going particularly well, it’s very easy to look at that and think everybody else has somehow figured this out except you.
They haven’t.
Losing confidence is horrible, but there’s another consequence of a long job search that I think can be even more damaging.
You start lowering your standards.
A role you wouldn’t have looked twice at six months ago suddenly seems quite attractive. The salary you said you wouldn’t go below becomes negotiable. The manager gave you a slightly weird feeling in the interview, but maybe you’re overthinking it. The commute is awful, but you can probably make it work.
Eventually the question changes.
You stop asking:
“Is this a good job for me?”
And start asking:
“Will they give me the job?”
I completely understand why that happens, particularly if you’ve been made redundant or money is getting tight. There comes a point where taking a job becomes more important than finding the perfect job.
But I think it’s worth recognising when job-search fatigue is starting to make decisions for you.
Because desperation can make things look like opportunities that you would have spotted as bad decisions six months earlier.
There are absolutely times when a rejection tells you something useful.
If you’ve applied for 100 jobs and haven’t had a single interview, I’d be looking very closely at your CV, the jobs you’re targeting and how you’re applying.
If you’re getting loads of interviews but never getting beyond the first stage, I’d be looking at what’s happening in those interviews.
If you’re consistently reaching final stages but not getting offers, that’s useful information too.
There are things you can diagnose and improve.
But what I wouldn’t do is take every individual rejection and turn it into a judgement about your professional worth.
I’ve sat on the other side of that decision.
Sometimes the person getting the rejection email was really good.
Somebody else was just slightly better for that particular role.
Sometimes they had experience the hiring manager particularly wanted. Sometimes they were internal. Sometimes they already knew the industry. Sometimes the hiring manager simply felt more comfortable with them.
Hiring decisions aren’t scientific.
They’re made by people, and people are messy.
If you were good at your job six months ago, twenty rejection emails haven’t suddenly removed twenty years of experience from your brain.
You still know what you know.
You’ve still done the things you’ve done.
The projects still happened. The results still happened. The problems you solved are still problems you solved.
What can disappear surprisingly quickly is your confidence in all of that.
So if you’re in the middle of a horrible job search at the moment, try to separate those two things.
Look objectively at what’s happening. If something isn’t working, fix it. Change your CV. Change your approach. Get feedback on your interviews. Look at whether you’re targeting the right roles.
But don’t automatically turn “this isn’t working yet” into “I’m not good enough.”
I’ve spent more than twenty years watching hiring decisions being made from the inside.
Trust me, there is far more randomness, timing, compromise, preference and plain old human judgement involved than most candidates will ever get to see.
A rejection can tell you that you didn’t get that particular job.
Sometimes that’s genuinely all it tells you.
Download my free CV Template
Try my AI CV Reviewer
Book a Personal CV Review
The Complete Job Search System combines my best CV, interview, LinkedIn and job search advice into one step-by-step programme, along with all my AI tools.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.