A few years into running communities full of founders and investors, I started noticing something that has almost nothing to do with capital and almost everything to do with how people think.
Two founders can walk into the exact same room, meet the exact same investors, get the exact same feedback, and walk out with completely different outcomes. One leaves with three conversations that turn into a round six months later. The other leaves frustrated that nobody wrote a check on the spot. Same room. Same opportunity. Different first principles about what the room was for.
That gap is worth sitting with, because it shows up everywhere in early-stage building.
The best investors that are part of SunDAO do not source from cold inboxes. They source from trust built over years. When people study how firms like Sequoia or a16z actually win their best deals, the answer is rarely a clever term sheet. It is a relationship that existed long before the deal did. The capital is the last step, not the first.
Founders who understand this treat every introduction as the start of something they have to earn. Founders who do not treat the introduction as the thing they were owed. The first group compounds. The second group keeps wondering why the room never “worked.”
Y Combinator built an entire culture around this idea. The advice they repeat most is almost embarrassingly simple: talk to your users, follow up, do the unscalable things, show up again. The founders who get the follow-up meeting are not the ones with the slickest deck. They are the ones who left room for a real exchange and then actually pursued it.
This is where first-principles thinking matters most. Strip away the noise and ask what is actually true: nobody can give you a relationship. They can give you a door. Whether anything walks through it depends on what you do next, and on whether the other side wants to walk through it too.
Investment DAOs taught me this at the structural level. The entire premise of collective due diligence is that no single person sees the whole picture. A validator catches a technical risk a generalist would miss. A founder spots a go-to-market flaw that an analyst would wave through. The intelligence is in the collaboration, not in any one seat at the table. But it only works when everyone contributes rather than waits to extract. A community where people only take is not a community. It is a queue.
The same is true of capital. An investor backing your company is choosing to build alongside you for years. That choice is theirs to make freely, and it is shaped by how you carry yourself in the small moments long before the wire.
Opportunity is not outcome. A room, an intro, a pitch slot, a warm feedback session: these are openings. They are valuable precisely because they are not guarantees. If they were guaranteed, they would be worthless, because everyone would have them.
Build from first principles, which means being honest about what each step can and cannot give you. And grow through collaboration, which means showing up as someone people want to build with, not someone they feel obligated to serve.
The founders and investors who internalise both tend to do quietly well over a long enough timeline. Not because the industry was generous to them, but because they understood what the industry actually rewards: people who give before they ask, and who treat every door as the beginning of the work rather than the end of it.
SunDAO Ventures is an investment DAO where 70+ experts in blockchain, AI, and emerging tech, collaborating on due diligence to co-invest in frontier tech. Founded by former ICF Ecosystem Lead Daiana Marculescu and ICF Technical Director & BIS Managing Architect Chris Zhong.
This post is for informational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.