by Sharad Swaney
Dear Room,
In February, Donald Trump was asked whether he was considering declaring a national emergency to take control of the 2026 midterm elections.
He said no.
This month, a right-wing host presented Trump with almost the exact same plan. Declare an emergency. Impose proof-of-citizenship requirements. Restrict mail voting. Do it without Congress.
Trump did not say no this time.
“Let me just say that stranger things have happened,” he answered. “I’ll leave it at that.”
There are 71 days until the midterm elections.
Before I keep going, if you want sourced reporting that separates the real danger from the panic surrounding it, please consider upgrading. Paid readers keep this room independent.
The emergency order.
This did not begin with one strange interview.
In February, a 17-page draft executive order began circulating among Trump-aligned election activists.
The document proposed declaring a national emergency over American elections. It claimed the president could impose new rules beginning with the 2026 election cycle, including federal voter identification requirements, hand-counting mandates, and expanded federal control over voting systems.
The draft was never signed. It was produced by outside activists, and there is no public evidence that Trump personally approved it.
When PBS asked Trump about it in February, he denied considering the plan.
Then, on March 31, Trump signed a different election order.
That order directed the federal government to create citizenship lists for every state. It told the Postal Service to develop a system under which mail ballots would only be transmitted for voters included on state-specific federal lists. It also threatened investigations, prosecutions, and the possible withholding of federal money.
It was Trump’s second executive order attempting to rewrite election rules during his second term.
The courts stopped him.
Federal judges blocked the central provisions.
On August 11, Judge Indira Talwani issued another nationwide injunction preventing the administration from using the Postal Service to limit mail voting during the midterms.
“The executive branch has no authority to regulate elections,” she wrote.
The Trump administration is asking the Supreme Court to let parts of the order take effect. His voting bill is also stalled in the Senate, where Republicans do not have the votes to overcome a filibuster.
The normal routes are closing.
That is why the emergency route matters.
The speech.
On July 16, Trump delivered a primetime address from the White House about election security.
He repeated false claims about the 2020 election and presented recently declassified intelligence as evidence that American elections are under attack. The released documents discussed foreign influence and vulnerabilities, but did not establish that votes were changed or that any election result was altered.
Steve Bannon immediately said the speech created the justification Trump would need for a national emergency.
“It’s coming,” Bannon told his audience. “Just block the last week of August out. It’s coming.”
Bannon does not work in the White House. There is no public evidence that he knows what Trump will do.
But election experts interviewed by The Guardian now say the administration appears to be constructing a public case for greater federal control over November’s election.
Then came Trump’s interview.
“Stranger things have happened.”
Wayne Allyn Root told Trump that he could declare a “national security emergency for elections” if Congress refused to pass his voting bill.
Root said Trump could use it to mandate photo identification, require proof of citizenship, and restrict mail ballots.
Trump could have rejected the idea.
Instead, he answered, “Stranger things have happened.”
That is not an emergency declaration. It is not a promise that one is coming.
It is the president refusing to close the door.
In February, the answer was no. In August, the answer was maybe.
What he legally cannot do.
Trump cannot cancel the midterm elections.
A national emergency would not give him lawful control over voting. The Constitution gives states and Congress authority over federal elections, not the president.
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, an emergency declaration can unlock powers contained in 137 federal laws. None gives the president authority to run elections.
Federal law also makes it a crime to deploy troops or armed federal agents to polling places, except when necessary to repel armed enemies of the United States.
The legal answer is clear.
The practical danger is what an illegal order could do before a court stops it.
They are preparing for troops.
Sen. Elissa Slotkin asked Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine to make one simple commitment:
“The Department of Defense will not send Federal troops to the polls or to seize election materials of any kind.”
The Pentagon said it would respond directly to her. No public commitment has been announced.
State attorneys general are preparing emergency lawsuits. Members of Congress are studying how to respond if federal agents appear near polling locations or if the government attempts to seize ballots.
These are not fringe internet theories anymore. Elected officials are holding planning exercises about them.
Why I am asking here.
This story is surrounded by claims that Trump can simply cancel the election and remain in power.
He cannot.
The real story is more complicated and, honestly, more frightening. He can issue an unlawful order, create confusion, force states into emergency litigation, intimidate voters, and use the resulting chaos to attack the outcome.
My job is to track every step, read the orders, check the law, and tell you what is actually happening without making the threat smaller or inventing powers Trump does not possess.
A paid subscription is $8 a month or $50 a year. No PAC money. No corporate sponsors. No dark donors. Just readers who decided this kind of reporting was worth fifty bucks.
If you want Sharad’s Room to keep doing that work through November, I am asking you to join them.
If you want to support this work or donate without a subscription, you can chip in directly through Venmo at @sharadswaney or you can buy me a coffee. Every bit genuinely helps keep the reporting going.
The quiet part.
The quiet part is that an election emergency does not need to be legal to hurt an election.
A midnight order can frighten voters. Federal agents can intimidate people without touching a ballot. A fight with the Postal Service can delay mail. A court battle can continue while votes are already being cast.
Then Trump can point to the chaos his own order created and call the result illegitimate.
I do not know whether he will declare an election emergency. Neither does anyone outside the people closest to him.
But the distance between this idea and the president is shrinking.
It went from a document circulated by activists, to an actual executive order, to a national speech, to Trump personally refusing to rule it out.
The law says Trump cannot take over the election. The danger is that he may try anyway.
Do not let that convince you that voting is pointless. That is exactly the response election denial is designed to produce.
Check your registration. Know your state’s deadlines. Vote early if you can. Keep proof that your ballot was accepted.
And if you read this far, please restack this post. People need to understand the threat without being told the election is already lost.
It is not.
Thank you for being in this room.
— Sharad
If you want to support this work without subscribing, you can buy me a coffee. Every bit genuinely helps.
A note for the room: I am 20 years old, running a nonprofit and this publication on my own. I work with research and editing tools, including Claude, an AI assistant, to keep up, the way other reporters work with editors and fact-checkers. Every quote and every source in this post was verified by me before anything went live. Other people will not tell you this, but I really care about journalistic integrity. Letting you know I use these tools to help me do this work all on my own is important to me. The room means trust, and trust means I tell you how the work gets made.
Sources
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.