Adblocking with a clear conscience

There is no such agreement on the web:

• On the users’s end, we don’t have advance notice that a link destination will contain malware (such as ads). The page has already downloaded; the content is already on our device before we agreed to anything. We were handed the goods and only told they had a price after leaving the store.
• On a site owner’s end, Terms of Service should not a shield to enable discrimination. ToS that discriminate against marginalized groups have historically warranted civil disobedience and lawsuits ending in legal reform that outlawed such practices; why should ToS discriminating against neurodivergent users be any different?

I have ADHD and overstimulation sensitivity. Requiring me to view ads is discriminatory. So yes, I would violate the fuck out of such a ToS with a clearer conscience than the site owners, and side with the plaintiffs should the site ever face an accessibility lawsuit.

Interact

You can interact by sending webmentions or by visiting a syndicated copy of this post.

Syndication

This post has been syndicated to:

• The Fediverse
• jstpst
• IndieNews

Web­mentions

This site supports Webmentions, a backlink-based alternative to traditional comment forms.

Send a Webmention Toggle 1 Webmentions

Webmentions received for this post appear in the following list after I approve them. I sometimes send Webmentions to myself on behalf of linking sites that don’t support them. I auto-replace broken links with Wayback Machine snapshots, if they exist.

Feel free to contact me directly with feedback; here’s my contact info