What’s Hot and Cooking In Scholarly Publishing
Live Last read · last published · next check
Today's guest bloggers reflect on an SSP panel conversation about how scholarly publishing is not only built through shared work but also through shared understanding. The post Guest Post — Not the Real Housewives of Scholarly Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Today's guest post argues that scholarly publishers' institutional credibility and alignment are in crisis, and suggests the time for a structural rebrand is now. The post Guest Post — Beyond Messaging: The Structural Case for Rebranding Scholarly Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Machine readers replacing human readers can sound like a threat. Today's post argues that our community is well prepared to face these challenges and seize the opportunities. The post Guest Post — Your Next Reader Is a Machine, and We Are Ready appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Today's post provides a brief analysis of self-referencing and scholarly impact through the lens of stigmergy theory The post Guest Post — Self-Citation Is How Fields Grow appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
In this AI era, establishing trust and validating article versions with persistent identifiers (PIDs) is more important than ever. The post Guest Post — AI Can Find the Article. Can It Tell Which Version It Used? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Today's guest post argues that digital preservation is not just a technical problem, but a function that often ignores issues of social justice, quietly codifying existing imbalances in scholarly communication. The post Guest Post — Preserving the Record, Shaping the Future: Why Diversity Matters in Digital Preservation appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
From 19th-century beef tea to paper mills and generative AI, the challenge is no longer detection alone; it is preventing bad claims from becoming embedded knowledge. The post Guest Post — When Errors Become Consensus: Science’s Self-Correction Can No Longer Keep Up appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Today's guest post asks: Do trust markers and other systematic fraud-prevention practices exclude unaffiliated authors from contributing to the scholarly record? The post Guest Post — The Guild and the Gap: What One Rejection Revealed About the Cost of Credentialism appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
The central risk of AI in scholarly publishing is therefore not hallucination but cognitive debt: the gradual erosion of the human capacities that give scholarship its originality, integrity, and meaning. The post Reading Between the Lines, Part 2: Cognitive Debt and the Adaptive Publisher appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
AI is now a permanent feature of the scholarly landscape. The question is no longer whether it should be used, but how it should be understood and governed. The post Reading Between the Lines, Part 1: A Cognitive Framework for AI in Scholarly Publishing appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Today Alice Meadows interviews Jennifer Fleet (Aries Systems) and Christian Gruback (ChronosHub) about changing author needs and how their recently announced partnership is an effort to address them. The post What Authors Expect Now, and Why Publishing Hasn’t Kept Up: An Interview with Jennifer Fleet of Aries Systems and Christian Grubak of ChronosHub appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
An interview with Natalie Ridgway about new guidelines from the Committee on Publication Ethics. The post New Guidance from COPE: An Interview with Natalie Ridgway appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .
Whether peer review needs revolution or evolution may be the wrong question. The more pressing one is whether the academic community is prepared to let scientific ideas be published, contested, and refined in public, rather than behind closed doors. The post Guest Post — Do we need (r)evolution in peer review? appeared first on The Scholarly Kitchen .