Introduction: As I sat here in the UK with my mum, I watched the UK’s departing PM, Sir Keir Starmer, use his last full working day as PM, to scoot all the way off to Ukraine to meet the little comic man there. Why on earth would a departing PM do this on his last day of work. Just one week later, when the new PM from Manchester, Andy Burnham had only been in the job for 7 days and hadn’t even had his first pay check, Zelensky comes to meet him in London and visit Ukrainian troops who are being given technology for their drones by the Brits, so the drones can evade Russian radars and kill more Russians. The next day Zelensky flies off to the U.S. to meet Trump and also it seems Bibi Netanyahu. A busy man. In British media, little is said of the visit to Ukraine and only that Burnham will continued its support for Zelensky. Business as usual.
As I have been writing about on and off, the U.K, is now most likely the most zealous country in its support for Ukraine (with the U.S. pretending indifference and yet VERY busy actively surrounding Russia with adversaries - Azerbaijan, Armenia, Kazakhstan, Finland etc), and is determined to maintain war against Russia, until hell freezes over it seems. I have mentioned how Britain historically saw Russia as a direct threat to its imperial goals back in the day, especially to India, its jewel in the crown. The Crimean War in the 1850s pitted Britain and France supporting the Ottomans against Russia. For those influencing Britain’s foreign agendas, who hover in those dark rooms at Chatham House (Royal Institute of International Affairs), scheming which country should be infiltrated next, in the spirit of its founders, Sir Robert Cecil and Alfred Balfour and with the ghost of Cecil Rhodes behind them, Russia is the essential enemy of Britain. The Anglo-Russian convention, signed in St. Petersburg in August 1907, was meant to mark the end of the “Great Game” between the two powers and to solidify the Triple Entente, along with France, designed to thwart the rise of the German empire. It didn’t work with Russia but in the end Germany was destroyed.
But this didn’t stop Britain attempting to betray Russia in 1915 after the outbreak of WW1, when it wanted to stop Russia taking control of Constantinople, which Russia had been given the agreement to take. This is disputed in conventional history books, but is something to consider. (I am looking for my sources here but can’t find them!) So Britain sailed its ships up the Dardenelles and landed at Gallipoli, amongst other places. British hero, Winston Churchill, was First Lord of the Admiralty and was keen on the Gallipoli campaign. Ostensibly it was to open a supply line to Russia and break the stalemate on the Western Front, but failed and led to massive loss of life and Churchill lost his post. Attempts to redeem him have since been made, but none the less, it is one of the most terrible examples of a failed and futile military campaign, with hundreds of thousands being led to the slaughter, as on the Western Front, with the callous indifference of many politicians and military leaders.
The gist though is Britain’s ongoing enmity toward Russia and strategically explained in the writings of British historian, Halford Mackinder, who posited the Heartland Theory, which states that control of vast interior of Eurasia (the heartland) is the key to global dominance. That book and paradigm was the basis of Zbigniew Brzezinski’s book, The Grand Chessboard. Brzezinski was President Carter’s National Security Advisor, originating from the upper echelons of Polish society, and became a highly influential operator in the U.S including being co-founder of the Tri-Lateral Commission and early visionary of a “technotronic” era where surveillance technology will allow elites to control the people’s of all countries without them even really knowing it. But even Brzezinski warned the West not to push the border of NATO to Russia and in particular not to try and control Ukraine. He wasn’t listened to. Nor was Henry Kissinger who said much the same thing. Even they saw that taking Ukraine under the wings of the Western Empire would be a step too far for Russia.
One thing to see here in Britain is how complete and water tight the media narrative is against Russia and for Ukraine. Yes, there is plenty of narrative in alt-media but none from any mainstream media or political party. Yes, the Greens may say a few things, but it is easy for them to stick to the pro Palestine narrative (which is totally essential) but say little about the role of Britain in supporting one of the most corrupt regimes in the world. In fact the Greens have accepted the classic liberal fudge and now support NATO and for Ukraine’s right of territorial integrity and supporting arming Ukraine.
The Green Party supports Ukraine’s right to self-determination and insists that Ukrainian voices must be central to any peace negotiations, explicitly rejecting dictates from Vladimir Putin or Donald Trump. The party advocates for a just and lasting peace based on Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, calling for intensified sanctions on Russia and continued support for Ukrainian defense.
While historically opposed to NATO, the party softened its stance after the 2022 invasion, acknowledging the alliance’s role in security while maintaining a long-term goal of UK withdrawal from NATO post-conflict. They support UK troops in peacekeeping roles only after a negotiated ceasefire, with robust parliamentary oversight, clear rules of engagement, and safeguards against escalation
The Ukrainian government and military is infiltrated with fascist sympathizers and even historical political organizations like the Organization of Ukrainian Nationalists (OUN), who were responsible for the massacre of hundreds of thousands of Ukrainians, Poles and Jew in the 2nd World War. Recently Zelensky honoured the legacy of the OUN’s former leader Andriy Melnyk, and described by him as a national hero at his reburial. He signed a decree granting the title “Heroes of the UPA” (Ukrainian Insurgent Army). The UPA was responsibly for the Volhynia Massacre of Polish civilians in WW2. This led to outrage in Poland and Polish President Karol Nawrocki stripped Zelensky of the Order of the White Eagle, Poland’s highest state honour.
Poland has been one of Ukraine’s biggest supporters and now it is looking very bad for Zelenksy as far as Poland is concerned. Neighbouring Lithuania were not that concerned though and the fact is that in WW2, there were many Lithuanian fascists on the side of the Nazis also killing Poles. NATO unity may not be all that it seems. Zelensky is letting things go to his head. Like Netanyahu, he is thinking he can get away with everything. He can’t and despite the current propaganda in the West, and very much in the UK, that Ukraine has Russia on the back foot and Russia is hurting and will sue for peace, the contrary may be true and Russia is now turning the screw on Ukraine economically, virtually cutting the country off from any exports of goods via sea.
But you wont read this in the media. All you read is the most biased propaganda possible and most in the UK are believing it, left and right. No one is calling Zelensky out for his overt fascist sympathies and this isn’t the first time. Stephan Bandera is still deified in Ukraine, although he was a fascist collaborator in WW2 and the inspiration for the Azov Battalion today.
Zelensky, not content to bomb Russia, with Western technology, including civilian targets (which gets little attention in the West but when Russia kills Ukrainian civilians, its outrage all around), and now expanding his operations by firing a missile on an Iranian ship in the Caspian Sea. That, in international law, is a declaration of war. Why would he do this? As he said himself, well, Iran supplied Russia with drones already so we are simply repaying them back. Even if true, it doesn’t take much intelligence to see that Zelensky is happy to open another front, ideally get Iran to respond and then watch his European “allies” pledge yet more money for the cause. Lets not forget it was just a couple of months ago that 90 billion euros was pledged by the EU, and more coming from the UK and already that addict Zelensky is wanting more and saying it is running out.
The UK is now sticking its fingers deeper into the pie of Iran. Just before Burnham came to office, the UK gave the green light for the U.S. to use its air force base in Fairford, Gloucestershire to send its B2 bombers to Iran. Iran has stated that this makes the U.K. complicit in the war, and cannot be rationalized as a “defensive” position. It could even be that Iran’s missiles could now reach the UK. Fairford is just up the road from where I am, so maybe I will see some fireworks in the sky in the next days. The UK lost any semblance of neutrality some time ago.
To take things further, the UK has now designated the Iranian IRGC an organization that threatens the UK and so anyone speaking favourably and in a positive way about the IRGC and two other “Iranian” organizations can be jailed for 14 years. All you have to do is say you think the IRGC is swell, that could be enough. But as David Miller states in his conversation with Crispin Flintoff here, you can still say the regular Iranian army is swell, just not the IRGC. They also mention this other fabricated organization that is also banned, which was stated to be responsible for the bombing of the Jewish run ambulances and as I stated before, this organization was made up, likely by Mossad.
I mentioned the new bill that has been rushed through parliament to try and give the legal backing for the new ban and any prosecutions that may follow and David Miller takes this all apart, saying that as with previous legislation designed to curb any dissent, this one is going to be hard to hold up in court, given how far it is trying to go. As it states in Section 17A, any statement of support or expressing a positive opinion or assisting in any way, said organizations, is enough to get you 14 years.
As a reminder here is what I wrote before and the description of the new legislation:
The National Security (State Threats) Bill received Royal Assent on 8 July 2026, formally becoming law rather than remaining in its final stages. The legislation grants the Home Secretary the power to designate bodies involved in foreign power threat activity as state threat organisations, a status equivalent to the terrorism proscription regime under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Key provisions and implications include:
New Offences: It is a criminal offence to support, assist, or obtain material benefits (including information) from a designated body, carrying a maximum sentence of 14 years imprisonment.
Controversy: Critics, including former independent reviewer of terrorism David Anderson, warned that the bill’s vague wording and lack of explicit safeguards could criminalize journalists, NGO workers, and diplomats engaging with designated groups, as obtaining information is classified as a material benefit.
COMMENT This is already happening with British journalists arrested and detained at airports and foreign journalists prevented from entering the country.
Government Defense: The Home Office maintains that legitimate activities such as journalistic freedoms, diplomatic engagement, and humanitarian work are protected, with provisions for a “reasonable excuse” defense in specific contexts.
COMMENT (what a joke, like when government issues voluntary D-Notices to media on the basis of compromising national security information - read embarrassing and illegal shit implicating government. These D - Notices are rarely ignored)
Justification: The government cited a 35% increase in MI5 state threat investigations and over 20 potentially lethal Iran-backed plots as reasons for fast-tracking the bill to disrupt proxy groups and foreign intelligence services.
COMMENT (you mean like that manufactured Iranian organization that no one had ever heard of before, which was accused of blowing up four Jewish run ambulances - so amatuerish in its creation, its amazing they even dared publish it. The government just makes this stuff up.)
Appeals Process: Designated bodies and affected individuals can challenge designations through the Proscribed Organisations Appeals Commission.
COMMENT (Good luck with that!!)
So, all these suits at Chatham House likely lose no sleep over the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Slavs on both sides as it fits into the Great Game narrative of controlling the heartland. As the UK economy tanks after 40 years of privatization, pillage and financial ponzi schemes, the temptation of the heartland remains to be taken. The spirit of Alfred Balfour, who we know is the name given to the Balfour Declaration in 1917, leading to the State of Israel, will be happy knowing that Israel’s is doing exactly what it must do for the West to have this stepping stone into the heartland. Will Russia endure or will the U.S. collapse under so many conflicting forces now as it staggers on through its self inflicted wounds of its Iran game. Maybe Bibi will get an earful today from Donald and maybe little Vlod will go away with not much. We can only hope so.
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.