Reinstate the prior prevention against users deleting their accounts immediately if they've cast multiple votes

To provide context (again):

• For a long while, there's been a feature where users who request deletion of their accounts and meet certain criteria for low activity (currently, not having posted on the site in the past) have their account deleted immediately, rather than having their account's deletion scheduled for 24 hours after they make the request.
• Additionally, there's a feature where users who've cast a lot of votes will have their deletion request placed on hold for a staff member to review their voting record and determine if their votes should be preserved, in order to prevent disruptive changes to others' reputation, as they would be removed otherwise.

As I found out from the last question I asked, the second bullet above only applies to users whose accounts are scheduled for deletion 24 hours later, i.e. if they don't meet the criteria to have their account deleted immediately. On the other hand, users who do qualify to have their account removed immediately (as they haven't posted anything) will have their votes removed immediately with no staff review even if they've cast a lot of votes that would ordinarily trigger a staff review.

You might think (and initially, I thought) that such users are few and far between. However, in the comments on my prior question, someone brought up a link to an SEDE query that indicates that it's potentially more common, especially with users voting on Hot Network Questions.

As I stated earlier, removing all votes upon user deletion can be disruptive to other users, especially if the user cast a lot of votes. That's the point of the staff check: if a user who requests deletion has cast a lot of votes, the staff check feature ensures that it doesn't cause a widespread, majorly disruptive change to everyone else's reputation. It doesn't make sense to not activate it in the specific case of the user not having enough non-voting activity to have their deletion be scheduled instead of immediate.

I think the best way to solve this issue is to reinstate the prior check that users who've voted more than once will have their account deletion scheduled instead of immediate. This will guarantee a staff review for all users who've cast a lot of votes even if they don't have enough non-voting activity. This check used to be present in the past, but was removed due to an incorrect assumption that users who've voted must have posted in order to gain the rep needed to vote (which is not always true as it ignores the association bonus and rep gained through suggested edits).

There's also another issue: it's been previously discussed that offering a bounty with the association bonus and then deleting and recreating your account to get your reputation back is considered abuse. In the past, users who've offered and awarded a bounty with their bonus and did nothing else on the site would have their deletion scheduled instead of immediate (as the offer and award were considered two votes), whereas now, it's immediate. This makes it more difficult for a moderator to stop the abuse by issuing a suspension before deletion (which will persist on recreated accounts). Re-making the deletion scheduled would allow for that.

I've thought about other ways to solve the main issue above, such as making immediate deletions also qualify for staff review, a solution offered by the staff member who answered my prior question. However, I think this is more complicated to implement in the code, and wouldn't solve the second issue of bounty abuse.

Can we please reinstate the prior check for multiple votes when seeing if a user's deletion needs to be scheduled instead of immediate?