Review and Mentoring of Independent Research

Over the years, I have received numerous messages from individuals who believe they have developed a novel scientific theory, identified a fundamental flaw in an established framework, or proposed a new approach to longstanding problems in physics, particularly in the foundations of quantum theory and cosmology. Others wish to engage in discussions on the foundations of physics, recent developments in the field, or broader questions in the philosophy of science.

Moreover, despite having over 12,000 subscribers, this Substack has not resulted in a significant level of peer-to-peer discussion, but has instead contributed further to an already substantial influx of individual consultation requests.

Unfortunately, the volume of these inquiries, often involving either extensive manuscripts ranging from dozens to hundreds of pages or requests for hour-long online consultation sessions, has grown to a level that no longer allows me to provide detailed feedback on voluntary basis.

While I appreciate the intellectual curiosity behind these submissions, a careful review requires a substantial investment of time and energy. It involves checking the internal consistency of the arguments, comparing them with existing scientific knowledge, identifying conceptual or formal issues, and discussing possible ways to develop the proposal further.

Therefore, because of the time commitment involved, I can no longer provide detailed reviews or online conversations free of charge. I now offer a paid scientific mentoring and theory-review service.

Possible areas of support include written feedback on manuscripts, preprints, and research notes, or one-to-one video conference consultations for in-depth discussion and real-time feedback for general scientific consultation.

I will support you in the critical evaluation of scientific theories and hypotheses, including identification of conceptual, logical, and mathematical inconsistencies, assessment of compatibility with established scientific results, guidance on rigorous formulation, and advice on relevant theoretical frameworks, as well as discussion of possible experimental consequences and testable predictions.

My role is not to endorse ideas, but to provide an honest, technically informed assessment based on current scientific knowledge and methodology. In some cases, I may conclude that a proposal is fundamentally flawed; in others, I may suggest ways to strengthen and refine it.

With a PhD in physics and extensive research experience, I can support you with technically informed feedback grounded in contemporary scientific practice.

I welcome inquiries from independent researchers, students, academics (e.g., philosopher that need an update on physics), and anyone with a serious interest in developing scientific ideas in a rigorous and productive manner, or seeking clarification on current scientific developments.

If you would like your work reviewed, please contact me and I will indicate whether I can assist, along with information on fees and expected turnaround times.

If you are looking for a private Zoom meeting go to this link or, alternatively, go to the subscription/upgrade section and select the “private conversation” plan.

Please note: This offering is focused on independent scientific inquiry and conceptual development, and is not a platform for student homework help, tutoring, or assignment completion.