Stock of the Week: Applied Materials Stock Drops After Earnings. Is It a Buy?

Applied Materials is firing on almost every fundamental cylinder. The company just delivered record quarterly revenue, AI-related demand remains exceptionally strong, and analyst expectations point to robust growth over the next few years. My Quality Stocks Investment Framework reflects that strength, with 71/100 for Growth and an impressive 91/100 for Quality.

The problem is the price. At $500+, Applied Materials trades above my Fair Price, while my Expected Return Model points to a TSR of just 9.9% per year (as valuation normalization could subtract roughly 6.7 percentage points from annual returns). With margins already near historical highs and significant growth priced in, I see limited room for disappointment.

My verdict: 🟠 Moderately Unattractive. Applied Materials is an excellent business benefiting from the AI investment cycle, but at current levels, I would rather wait for a better entry point.

Welcome to Stock of the Week. Every week, I break down a stock affected by significant market news, earnings updates or a compelling valuation disconnect. Then, I analyze it through the Quality Stocks Investment Framework.

Applied Materials ($AMAT) | August 2026 analysis

Market cap $403B | Stock price $507

• The event. Applied Materials delivered a record Q3 FY2026, with revenue reaching $9.12B, +25% YoY and GAAP EPS rising 43% to $3.17 (EPS under expectations). Management provided a strong Q4 outlook of $10.25B in revenue at the midpoint, both above Wall Street expectations. AI-related investment continues to support demand across leading-edge logic, DRAM and advanced packaging

• Market reaction. Despite the beat and strong guidance, Applied Materials shares fell roughly 5%, after already declining 2.5% during the previous session. The reaction comes after an extraordinary run: even following a 30% pullback from its June high, the stock was still up more than 100% YTD before the earnings reaction

• The analysis. The sell-off appears to be driven more by elevated expectations than deteriorating fundamentals. After the huge AI-driven rally, investors had set an exceptionally high bar for semiconductor-equipment companies, meaning that even record results and above-consensus guidance were not enough to trigger another leg higher. Morgan Stanley even believes the company's "outgrowth" versus the wafer fabrication equipment industry now appears to be narrower than expected and lowered its systems shipment growth estimates to 42% from 44%. The brokerage expects 37% to 40% growth for the wafer fabrication equipment industry. Near-term margin expectations and the pace of future growth also attracted scrutiny. Fundamentally, however, Applied Materials continues to benefit from rising AI infrastructure spending, with management raising its 2026 Semiconductor Systems growth outlook to more than 30% and expecting another strong growth year in 2027. The key question is therefore less whether the business is performing and more whether the current valuation already prices in too much of the AI investment cycle.

🟢 Growth 71/100

🟢 Quality 91/100

🟡 Valuation 44/100

Applied Materials is expected to maintain a very strong growth profile over the next few years, supported by continued investment in AI infrastructure, advanced logic, memory and packaging. Analyst consensus currently points to revenue growth of roughly 30% in 2027 and 20% in 2028, while earnings should grow even faster. As a result, the PE would compress toward 30x 2027 earnings and 25x 2028 earnings if the company delivers on current expectations.

Profitability is equally impressive, with net margins expected to remain above 30%. However, this is significantly above the company’s historical profitability, with net margins closer to the low-20% range in recent years. This means investors are not only paying for strong growth, but also assuming that much of the recent margin expansion is sustainable. With both growth and profitability expectations already elevated, the current valuation leaves less room for execution disappointments.

To go further, here is my breakdown of the differences between ASML, Applied Materials, KLA Corporation and Lam Research.

Before jumping into the stock’s numbers, here is a quick refresher on how the Quality Stocks Investment Framework translates fundamentals into disciplined execution because we want to find great businesses built for the decade, bought at execution targets built for right now.

🔎 FIND → 🏢 UNDERSTAND → 💰 VALUE → 🎯 EXECUTE → 🚪 EXIT

1. 🔎 Selection & Scoring - Find potential great businesses

2. 🏢 Business Model Analysis - Understand how they create value

3. 💰 Expected Returns & Fair Value - Determine what they are worth

4. 🎯 Buy Zones - Execute with discipline

5. 🚪 Sell Decision - Know when to exit

To dive deeper into the complete process, read the full Investment Framework guide

Leave a comment

My projected Total Shareholder Return (TSR) for Applied Materials is built from 6 components, each estimated on an annualized basis:

• Organic growth: +15.0%/year

• Acquisitions: +0.5%/year

• Dividends: +0.5%/year

• Share buyback: +0.5%/year

• Valuation expansion: -6.7%/year

• Margin expansion: +0.2%/year

• Total: 9.9%/year

My Quality Stocks Fair Price combines analyst consensus and my DCF valuation using an equal-weighted approach

• Analyst consensus: $600

• DCF calculation: $330

• Quality Stocks Fair Price: $465

Market prices move much faster than business fundamentals, often leading investors to overpay during rallies or panic during drawdowns. Instead of trying to time a single perfect entry price, the Quality Stocks Framework establishes staggered Buy Zones creating a mix between fundamental analysis and technical analysis. This disciplined, multi-tiered approach allows to scale into quality positions as the risk-reward profile improves taking emotion out of the execution.

• Buy zone 1: $440 - 🟡 Conditional below $440

• Buy zone 2: $330 - 🟢 Moderately attractive below $330

• Buy zone 3: $250 - 🟢 Highly attractive below $250

Verdict: 🟠 Moderately Unattractive

Applied Materials is one of the clear beneficiaries of the AI investment cycle. Growth, demand visibility and profitability are all exceptionally strong and the latest results reinforce the fundamental story.

The issue is valuation, not business quality. At current levels, expectations already appear demanding, leaving little room for execution disappointments and limiting the potential upside. My expected return model points to an annualized TSR below 10% (9.9%), which is not attractive enough for me given the risks inherent in the semiconductor cycle (especially upstream in the supply chain).

The technical setup does not provide a particularly compelling entry point either, and I would prefer to wait for a more meaningful consolidation before considering a position.

My conclusion is therefore simple: Applied Materials is an excellent business, but at current levels, I don’t see an attractive opportunity. In other words, my model does not rely on weak operating assumptions. Even with strong growth, valuation normalization significantly limits the expected shareholder return. This is a valuation call, not a fundamental one.

• Uber: Is Bill Ackman Right to Be Bullish?

• Alphabet dipped following its Q2 26 earnings, discover why

• BNP Paribas posted strong earnings, but is the valuation attractive or is patience required?

• Company results. Applied Materials Q2 2026 (Q3 fiscal) earnings release and earnings presentation

• Historical data and analyst consensus. MarketScreener

• Scoring, valuation & verdict. Quality Stocks Investment Framework

• Technical analysis. ProRealTime via MarketScreener / Quality Stocks

Historical data and analyst consensus for my analyses are sourced via MarketScreener. It is my go-to platform for global stock data and analyst price targets. If you are looking to upgrade your research toolkit, click here (Full disclosure: this is an affiliate link, so you will be supporting this newsletter at no extra cost to you!)