RSS Amplifier

OMI Firm · Aug 18, 2025

Never try to convince others to support your character or brand

0
Sign in to vote or save

Mike Norton · OMI Firm

She wanted children. He did not.

Yet, they had been in a committed, romantic relationship for nearly ten years. They even lived together.

She asked me if there was anything she could do to “convince” him.

She literally used the word “convince.”

I was very gentle because she was my friend, but I politely explained to her that if you feel you need to “convince” a man to have children with you—especially after bedding him for nearly ten years—your relationship has already failed in key ways you’ve been willfully blind to.

It doesn’t matter what brilliantly contrived excuses he gives you: He either views you as worth that commitment or he does not.

Trust in your brand works the same way, because the reasoning pertains to a universal human dynamic: Your customers either view you as worth the commitment of their money or they do not.

Once people form an impression of you or your brand, they rarely change it—especially if it’s negative. Meanwhile, it is easier to maintain a person’s negative impression of you than it is to maintain a good impression.

A good reputation can take years to build, yet seconds to break. Meanwhile, a bad reputation can take seconds to build, with little to no effort necessary to maintain it for life.

This is because society has a skeptical and cynical bias, leaning toward negative impressions; this is why only 1-3% of customers are classified as “innovators” in their purchasing habits, according to the Law of Diffusion of Innovation.

Meanwhile, the rest of the 97-99% of the human population waits for the “innovator” percentage to dive into a new brand’s offer first—converting at various stages after the innovators take the first plunge, in alignment with whether they are members of the early adopters, early majority, late majority, or laggards, respectively.

Therein, it is never enough over the long term to merely make a good first impression; you must continually pay the proper dues, ritualistically as a standard of quality, to maintain that impression of your character or your brand (which are essentially the same thing in this context) over time with integrity.

The world has a negative bias for an evolutionary reason pertaining to mortality and risk management. In ancient times, who wanted to be the first person in the village to try a mysterious mushroom or a beautiful new berry you’ve never seen before?

Whether either would be deadly poison or the key to an enlightening spiritual journey might as well be a coin toss. The ocean of knowledge humanity has of our planet’s flora rests upon a bedrock of skeletons—skeletons of the sorrowful innovators who dared to take the chance for the greater good of their respective villages.

So, in their best manifestation, that archetypal “first person,” willing to give you the benefit of the doubt, are the people who drive humanity forward.

But in their worst manifestation, they become the foolish, well-meaning victims of scam artists and cults.

You may not think this applies to you, your product, or service—but it absolutely does.

It applies because it doesn’t matter if you are selling a book or pizza—the neurological framework for risk-management universally applies due to such ancient circuits that do not differentiate.

It still takes that archetypal “first person” willing to invest the risk in the book you’ve published if they have no proof that the book will be a good read.

It still takes that archetypal “first person” willing to invest the risk in the pizza you’ve baked if they have no proof that your pizza will be better than your rival’s, who had already established notoriety for their restaurant years before you.

So, your market forms the bell curve of innovators to laggards based on how well and worthy of trust you are able to present yourself to it. Thus, you should plan the presentation of whatever you are selling as a part of whatever brand you are building with empathy for your target audience’s ancient circuits for risk management.

What does that mean in plain English?

Do everything you reasonably can to give them every credible and authentic reason to trust you at first glance.

Using myself as an example, the marketing industry is filled with liars and con-artists. There is always another cocky twenty-something trying to pose in front of a Lamborghini he can’t actually afford in an effort to convince well-meaning, desperate, financially struggling people to pay an exploitative price for his magical funnel.

Yet, the need “to market” what any brand is selling in any industry is inescapable; this is why the marketing industry can never and will never go away. This therein begs the question about credibility: How did I make my breakthrough in such a saturated market filled with credibility issues?

The answer is simple: I invested the legitimate time and effort into winning academic awards, earning a college degree, and multiple certifications in the field, as well as the third-party verified 5-star reviews earned over a decade of experience.

Meanwhile, content like this article is part of my portfolio, which I share openly with any inquiring lead.

In that portfolio is a plethora of information pertaining to accomplishments I’ve made for both myself and other companies. Marketplaces like Upwork verify the authenticity of my work, and keeps records of what jobs are successful and which are not, producing me a job success score or percentage of success at the top of my profile.

Thus, I have done everything I reasonably can to give you, my target audience, every credible and authentic reason you need to trust me at first glance—leading by example.

I generally market OMI Firm to established corporations and funded startups, not the general populace.

In contrast, the fake Lamborghini types can never successfully market to corporate individuals because those who are educated in business see straight through them.

Yet, even I am still not immune to skepticism—even in the corporate world, it occasionally occurs that the board goes in a different direction.

So, optimize everything that you can reasonably control with honesty about how you present your brand to the world. No matter what—there will always be at least one person in the room who doubts you, but then, and only then, is it okay to just let them go.

But not before.

Interest is easy. People express it casually with a like, a follow, a polite nod in a meeting, or a “let’s circle back” in an email.

But interest alone costs them nothing tangible beyond a moment of attention—no sacrifice, no risk, no skin in the game. It’s a signal, not a pledge.

A person can be interested in a hundred brands, a dozen causes, or even multiple romantic partners at once, but that interest rarely shapes the trajectory of their life in any meaningful way.

Commitment, on the other hand, always costs something. In fact, cost is a prerequisite for commitment, even if the cost isn’t money.

Commitment universally requires risk, investment, and the surrender of alternatives. Regardless of whether we speak of commitment in terms of romance, friendship, or business.

In relationships, commitment generally means exclusivity, shared plans, and building a life together.

In business, commitment means customers opening their wallets, employees tying their careers and livelihoods to both your mission and their faith in your ability to succeed in that mission, or investors betting their capital on your vision.

Interest is surface-level attention; commitment is proof of trust.

A brand that confuses interest for commitment will constantly mistake vanity metrics for loyalty—and will always be surprised when the crowd disappears the moment something shinier comes along.

Think about Netflix.

Millions of people will say they’re “interested” in watching a new series when the trailer drops. Social chatter spikes, hashtags trend, and the metrics look promising.

But when the first week of viewership numbers come in, the truth is revealed: Only a fraction of those who expressed interest actually committed their time to pressing play.

Interest fills the funnel with noise, but commitment is the signal—the data that proves whether a story, product, or brand actually has staying power.

The same dynamic plays out in business.

A prospect might engage with your LinkedIn post, download your white paper, sign up to your e-mail list, or even book a discovery call. But none of that equals real commitment until they sign the contract or swipe the card.

Confusing the two is how companies inflate their pipeline numbers and then wonder why revenue keeps falling short.

In other words: never measure your brand’s worth by the size of your audience’s interest—measure it by the depth of their commitment.

Skepticism doesn’t just live in the minds of customers—it seeps into boardrooms, sales cycles, and even internal teams.

A skeptical prospect takes longer to close, demands more proof, and often negotiates harder, dragging out the sales process and inflating acquisition costs.

Investors who doubt your credibility will impose tighter terms or withhold funding altogether.

Even employees who don’t fully trust leadership tend to become disengaged, performing at the bare minimum (also known as “quiet quitting) rather than pouring themselves into the mission. In each case, skepticism adds friction, slowing momentum, and multiplying the resources required to move forward.

The hidden cost is opportunity.

While you’re busy trying to overcome suspicion, more trustworthy competitors win business simply by showing up with credibility already intact.

When doubt surrounds your brand, word-of-mouth works against you rather than for you, creating a compounding effect of lost deals and diminished reputation.

This is why companies that underestimate skepticism often find themselves spending ten times as much on marketing and sales efforts, all while wondering why the returns keep shrinking. In the economy of trust, skepticism is not neutral—it is a form of debt.

Take Tesla as an example.

In its early days, the company faced immense skepticism: investors doubted the viability of electric cars, consumers questioned their safety and reliability, and the auto industry mocked the idea of disrupting century-old giants.

But Elon Musk and his team leaned into transparency and proof. They offered test drives, opened patents, and relentlessly showcased performance data. Over time, Tesla converted skepticism into credibility, not by rhetoric but by evidence, which allowed them to command both investor confidence and cultural cachet.

Now contrast that with Theranos.

Elizabeth Holmes built her empire on hype, smoke, and mirrors, convincing investors and the media with charisma instead of proof.

For years, skepticism was suppressed, but it never disappeared—it compounded.

Once cracks appeared, doubt turned into full-blown collapse. Customers, partners, and regulators who had once given Theranos the benefit of the doubt became its fiercest critics.

The lesson is simple: skepticism doesn’t vanish on its own. Either you confront it with transparency and evidence, or it festers until it costs you everything.

Reputation is not built in the fireworks of a launch; it’s built in the quiet consistency of showing up, delivering, and standing by your word when nobody’s watching.

Flashy marketing tactics can win you attention in the short term, but they rarely buy you loyalty. Just as a marriage isn’t secured by one romantic gesture but by years of steady commitment, a brand’s reputation rests on the accumulation of small, reliable acts of integrity. Every customer interaction, every promise kept—or broken—becomes a brick in the foundation of how the world remembers you.

The danger is that shortcuts often feel faster but cost more in the long run. Urgency tricks, exaggerated claims, and hype-driven launches can pull in quick wins, but they also plant seeds of doubt that grow into skepticism when the delivery doesn’t match the promise.

The long game requires patience and restraint, a willingness to resist the temptation of instant validation in favor of building a reputation that compounds over years. Brands that embrace this approach aren’t just remembered—they’re trusted, recommended, and defended by their customers when it matters most.

Patagonia is a clear example of the long game done right.

For decades, they’ve reinforced their reputation not through stunts, but by quietly aligning their business practices with their stated values—repairing old gear instead of pushing new sales, pledging profits to environmental causes, and staying consistent in their messaging.

Customers trust them not just for jackets but for integrity, and that trust compounds year after year into fierce loyalty.

Now compare that with the Fyre Festival, which built its entire reputation on smoke, mirrors, and social media hype.

The event sold out on glossy promises, celebrity endorsements, and carefully crafted appearances. But when delivery didn’t match the marketing, its reputation didn’t just collapse—it exploded into one of the most infamous brand implosions of the last decade.

The contrast is simple: Patagonia shows how steady consistency builds a fortress of trust, while Fyre proves how hype without substance guarantees ruin.

Not every customer is meant for you—and not every skeptic deserves to be converted.

The instinct to chase every lead, argue with every critic, or bend over backwards for every doubtful prospect is natural, but it’s also wasteful.

Some people will never believe in you no matter how much proof you provide, because their doubt isn’t really about your brand—it’s about their worldview, their risk-aversion, or even their ego.

Trying to win them over is like trying to convince a partner who has already checked out of the relationship: the more you plead, the weaker you look.

In these cases, walking away is not a sign of failure—it’s a sign of strength.

The moment you stop trying to be everything to everyone, you create space for the right people to step forward. Healthy brands, like healthy relationships, recognize when continued pursuit is draining energy that could be invested elsewhere.

The discipline of letting go signals confidence to the market: You trust your own value enough to accept that not everyone will. And ironically, it’s often that very posture of self-assurance that draws the right people closer.

At the end of the day, trust—whether in love or in business—can never be forced.

It isn’t won by begging, manipulating, or endlessly chasing.

It’s earned through clarity, consistency, and the courage to walk away from those who will never see your value or fully appreciate the offer you present to them.

The brands that thrive over decades are the ones that understand this simple truth: commitment is a choice, not a concession.

Your job is not to “convince” the unconvinced or the underappreciating, but to build with such integrity that the right people choose you without hesitation as your brand continually grows.

I have...

  • Helped to build nearly 200 businesses over the past ten years as an award-winning marketing strategist.

  • Multiple business certifications, collegiate awards won, and a college degree in business. Click here to view them.

  • Back-to-back 5-star reviews on Upwork while also "expert-vetted" and verified by Upwork with a +90% business success rate.

  • A public, digital portfolio of some of the work I've performed for other businesses that you can click here to view.

You have but to check me out on LinkedIn and view my Upwork profile to verify. Click the links to do so; I have provided them in the sentence before this one to make it easy for you.

And, if you're a college student, I provide limited business mentoring for absolutely free to help you get on your feet.

You have but to reply directly to this e-mail to explain to me what your entrepreneurial situation is.

We can work something out that is unique to you.

Click here to schedule a free appointment with me.

...please show your support by signing up to my Substack.

Your $7/month support matters more than you think, as it enables me to continually produce this kind of content and further develop my ideas, which are intended to help you think differently and see more clearly about your business and its customers.

You can also consider the price as a kind of limited consulting retainer, as you’ll also be granted my direct and personal attention to talk about your actual business in either comments, e-mails, or direct messaging.

No posts

Read the original on omifirm.substack.com

Comments

Nothing yet. Say the first thing.

    Sign in to join the conversation.