RSSAmplifier

Blog

Research notes

notlar11.wordpress.comRSS feed ↗10 posts

Latest posts

Newton’s Proposition 1

In Prop.1 Newton claims to prove that in an orbit areas are proportional to times

Definition of the strong empty set

I notice that mathematicians define something called an empty set and then go ahead and assume that this set has elements. So hereby I give a stronger definition of the empty set: Definition1) The set named empty set , , has no elements.2) Not only has no elements, it has absolutely, truly, mathematically, logically and philosophically, Continue reading Definition of the strong empty set

Disambiguation of “k is an element of the empty set”

1) So we have this simple expression that has only 3 terms: . This is read as is an element of the empty set . Or it should be read like that. But all of the terms are loaded and no two mathematicians agree on how to read this expression. I find this very strange.2) Continue reading Disambiguation of k is an element of the empty set

Mathematics and logic

Mathematics has been corrupted by logic and it must return to its pre-Russell days. Russell s project of trying to make arithmetic a branch of logic has failed. For Russell and Co. set theory was logic. But set theory is riddled with all sorts of contradictions.

Conway on numbers

In a Google talk John Conway said numbers are like cats, you cannot have cats or numbers do what they don t want to do. Fine. But numbers are just names we give to collections of units. So, units come before numbers.

Mathematical existence

Mathematical existence is different than ontological existence. In mathematics we deal with mathematical objects and we can make mathemathical objects exist by simply defining them as existing: There exists or Voila! Now, as far as mathematics is concerned exists. We don t need any other arguments or justifications. If we don t want to exist we Continue reading Mathematical existence

How to legalize contradiction

This is not axactly true. Mathematicians legalize any contradictions they don’t like by using contradictions of the set theory. Mathematicians chose the most illogical type of mathematics as tha default logic of mathematics. They use the contradiction riddled set theory logic as false withess to legalize contradictions. Doctors of Theology legalize sin by scholastic sophistry. Continue reading How…

Contradiction is sacred

Mathematics is based on definitions. Scholastic doctors make their career by making new definitions. Their ultimate goal is to have a definition named after them. This is why mathematics is a closed knowledge field. Mathematics is a collection of independent fields. The boundaries of these fields are defined by the axioms of the fields. Axioms Continue reading Contradiction is sacred

Set theory sophistry

Set theory has its own absurd logic based on mathematicians’ authority. I don’t have to believe these absurd set theory conventions because they somehow entered textbooks and they are defended blindly by an army of scholastic doctors who call themselves “mathematicians”. “k is an element of the empty set” is a legal statement in set Continue reading Set theory sophistry

Stomping on logic

This is how a set and the null set is defined in mathematics: (1) A set is a [collection of elements]. (2) A null set is [a set] that contains no elements. Mathematically, we are allowed to replace “a set” in (2) with its definition in (1): (3) A null set is [a collection of Continue reading Stomping on logic