LibDem Attack on Our Flags - Time to Fight Back

The morale and tribal identity of millions of ordinary Brits was boosted by the success of the high visibility Raise the Colours campaign last summer. The liberal elite were as shaken as we were heartened, a display of tribalism and unity on that scale simply couldn’t be allowed to continue.

It took them a while to get a grip on it, but now they have – last week’s judgement in the anti-indigenous lawfare case brought by Oxfordshire Council has effectively destroyed the RTC movement in every area not controlled by Reform or Restore.

The order, granted by a High Court judge, makes it a contempt of court offence, punishable by fines or prison, for named local RTC activists – and anybody else – to put flags on council-owned lamp posts in the county. The ban will initially last for one year but can easily be renewed.

Oxfordshire County Council is controlled by the LibDems, who hold 34 of the 69 seats. Their attack on English and British flags came as no surprise, given their previous record of forcing all schools in the county to serve a vegan school dinner to all primary pupils one day each week as part of their ‘climate change’ policy. Politicians guilty of such institutionalised child abuse were bound to decide to use taxpayers’ money to try to stamp out the highly effective display of grass-roots patriotism and identitarianism.

They could not have done it, however, without the decision of an activist judge, and the career of the individual behind this disgraceful judgement tells us as much about a critical weakness in the British nationalist movement as the silent acceptance of the judgement does about the men and parties who currently lead it.

Mr. Justice Dexter Dias is a Cambridge-educated British Asian. Some South Indian Dias families are descended from the old Ceylonese royal family, others are Sephardic Jews whose ancestors controlled the coral, pearl and diamond trade. Which is Dexter’s heritage is unclear; all we do know is that the man who has just ruled to prevent English patriots putting up our ancient flags, is an alien interloper with a chip on his shoulder over ‘our’ colonial past.

He began his career as a well-known civil rights legal activist representing anti-apartheid campaigners and poll tax protesters. He has, to be fair, done some good work with anti-AFGM campaigns but, that apart, the rest of his legal efforts are typical of those of the activist lawyers whose devotion to ‘equality’ is a thin disguise for anti-British bias and anti-white racism.

When Dias issued his judgement, there was a flurry of social media posts from RTC supporters complaining about the way in which an ethnic foreigner was in a position to deliver such a hammer blow to a symbolically very important and significant part of the indigenous resistance movement.

Unfortunately, however, most of these comments managed to miss the real point completely, becoming yet another example of the defeatist whining which dominates so much of the ‘thinking’ of these lazy doom-porn-mongers.

What, then, should our collective response be?

First of all, we should stop complaining that our opponents game the system far better than we do. Yes, it’s true that anti-British and anti-white bias is now hardwired into every single institution in the land.

This needs to be challenged; the Powers That Be must be forced to recognise our existence and to grant us our rights, the first of which is parity of esteem. If, once this challenge has been properly formulated and effectively prosecuted, over years and through every possible peaceful avenue, they still refuse to play by their own rules when it comes to our community, then our people will be fully entitled to set about securing their rights by all means necessary.

For now, however, the only action in this regard which is both necessary and morally permissible is to stop whining about the success of leftist lawyers advancing the rights of ‘minorities’ favoured by the left, and to get to work creating our response: A similar network of our own lawyers whose mission is to secure and advance the rights of the people who, as every year goes by, become the minority in more and more parts of our occupied country.

That, to be honest, is a very serious, difficult and long-term undertaking. A lawfare fightback, on the other hand, could and should be very much quicker. The primary reason for the LibDem bullies’ legal success by way of Dexter Dias is not the power of their arguments, or even the prejudices of the judge, but the fact that the Raise the Colours activists are ordinary working-class men and women who were hit by a taxpayer-funded legal steamroller.

The shame here is not on anti-English bigots for exercising the power they have so carefully accrued, but on the populist leaders who failed to come to the aid of the victims of this legal bullying. Both Nigel Farage and Rupert Lowe were very happy to ride the wave of popular patriotic confidence created by the huge success of the RTC movement. And both are multi-millionaires in their own right, as well as controlling extremely well-funded political machines.

As such, the only question should have been which of them would leap to the defence of the Oxfordshire patriots first, and who would fund the best team of heavyweight lawyers to fight the corner which they are occupying on all our behalves.

Simultaneously, the lawfare response should be a systematic counter-attack on all the flags which the liberal elite and their minority clients love. Arguments used and precedents made against our flags can and must be used to take down theirs as well – starting with the LGBTQ banners of institutionalised child abuse and Satanic rebellion against God.

This isn’t even difficult, since the lone-wolf English rights activist lawyer Robin Tilbrook has already won a very important victory in this regard.

Having criticised Farage and Lowe, let’s note in passing that they are not the only individuals on (at least in theory) our side of the fence who conspicuously failed in this case. There are in Britain several dozen ‘right-wing’ talking heads, podcasters, influencers and the like who have very successfully monetised majority resentment against things like this.

The pro-Zionist ones in particular, with their massive leg-up from Elon Musk, are each raking in tens of thousands of pounds every month from their monetised posts on the big social media posts, with donations and merchandise sales bringing in even more.

If you include Irish and American figures, even the anti-Zionist, ultra-hardline nationalist scene has a good number of individuals and micro-party leaders who are doing very nicely thank you out of majority resentment, fear and anger. Why the hell have they not weighed in here?

Perhaps a more useful question is, how much longer will their supporters continue to fund their lifestyles and wealth accumulation before insisting that they put at least a few grand of their money where their mouths are?

These supposedly more militant campaigners for our collective rights could also be effective in other fields. Where they have grass-roots followers, they could encourage them to visit Oxfordshire, or wards held by LibDem councillors all over the country. There are various ways in which to make the point that there are political costs to be paid by a party which seeks to crush patriotic expression.

This, after all, is a national issue. The LibDem controlled council in Shropshire has also threatened legal action and effectively broken the local RTC team, but every LibDem councillor in the entire country is a willing part of the same anti-British machine. With populist parties still in a position to unseat many of them in council elections over the next couple of years, they should be made to pay the price for their colleagues’ bullying bigotry.

Here’s a very simple poster design I just knocked up which people (including you?) could use. The big question here is why Restore Britain or Reform UK, both of them with offices packed with full-time staff with virtually limitless budgets, haven’t produced something similar already, and got teams of their people hitting hundreds of vulnerable LibDem wards? Political pain – and plenty of it – is the only thing these anti-British bigots will ever understand.

This is by no means the only necessary response. As the tribalisation of Britain deepens and our peoples’ resentment and fear over the demographic changes grows, then it is inevitable that such insults to us and assaults on our identity will produce a backlash which is communal and organic, rather than led by political parties with their own ambitions.

It shouldn’t need political activists to tell ordinary people that, when the elite do something like tear down their flags from lamp posts, they should respond en masse by flying them from their gardens, houses, trees, telegraph poles, and so on.

RTC - A Gift for Nationalist Community Builders

·

December 18, 2025

We have settled on the true meaning of “building community”. It is not helping a community in search of votes. It is not building comradeship in an isolated nationalist organisation. It is finding ways to help to strengthen the bonds within an existing community.

Indeed, the result of trying to ban a few named individuals from flying our flags from lamp posts in Northern Ireland would be a mass movement of previously uninvolved people going out and spontaneously bedecking every piece of council ‘street furniture’ in the area with flags.

‘Injunct that, you bastards!’ would be the response in Belfast. And, one day in the not-too-distant future, the people on the mainland will come to the same level of tribal awareness and spontaneous resistance.

‘Legal riot’ resistance is another factor which, in a hopefully not too distant time, LibDem bigots like those in Oxfordshire and Shropshire (where they’ve threatened and bullied the RTC teams in the same way) would have to take into account when deciding whether to tear down our flags or leave them be.

Their Freedom of Information Requests office should be broken by the sheer weight of demands. Every Letter Before Action threatening an application for Judicial Review costs them thousands of pounds to fend off. These could be directly about their attack on our flags, or their flying of others, or they could be on all sorts of other issues. The point is that each of them costs them as much as a full-scale riot in the town centre would, but without anyone risking any legal or financial penalty whatsoever.

In the case of Oxfordshire County Council, for example, their decision to force vegan meals on primary school children is just begging for a JR action. The harmful effects to the health of young children especially from a vegan diet is scientifically proven beyond any doubt – there’s the open goal, there’s a perfect way to show them that insulting the English comes at a price.

In fact, it’s such a golden opportunity that, yet again, one must ask what the office-lizards at Reform and Restore actually do with their time, because both parties have the funds and the legal contacts to dive in and take a Judicial Review of this LibDem child abuse all the way.

Likewise, why the hell haven’t these parties – both of which are wallowing in money, and the potential to raise more any time they need it – already responded to the distinctly unpopular tearing down of our flags by hiring billboards in the guilty councils’ areas and putting up something like this? The landing page would be just as simple, giving people a reminder of the issue, capturing their data for direct contact, and giving them the council forms they need to register to vote and to do so by post if at all possible.

The impact in very liberal Oxfordshire would, to be honest, be limited, but Shropshire used to be staunchly Tory. The LibDems are not well bedded-in, something proven by the fact that Reform won sixteen seats in the county in the last elections, from a standing start and with their usual feeble and amateurish campaign.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not arguing that either Reform or Restore is going to sweep to electoral power. I’m certainly not suddenly saying that there’s a parliamentary road out of the civilisational clusterfuck. But I am pointing out that effort by even populist political parties, properly directed, can help to heighten awareness, build resistance and bring small but beneficial changes.

For the record, the most I think we should expect to get from any combination of populist or nationalist electioneering success which is conceivable at present is a small reduction in illegal immigration, a token showing of kicking out a few of the worst, and a move to allow the establishment of charities and self-help organisations specifically for the indigenous people of our nations.

This latter concession, seemingly a very small thing, would however make the basic organisation our people need about ten times easier than it is now. It will come, because the present position whereby we alone are denied this basic right is so blatantly unfair and provocative that - if challenged intelligently and consistently – it will be overthrown. And that will be another step in the right direction – along with getting those flags back up.

Don't Let the Bigots Take Down Our Flags!

·

September 14, 2025

Labour, Lib Dem, SNP and Plaid councils are quietly sending out teams of council workers to take down flags put up by Raise the Colours activists and independent members of the public. These leftist bigots add insult to injury as taxpayers who were heartened to see the display of patriotism and identity are forced to pay to have them removed.