Fauci Hid His Miscarriage Warning

Dear friend,

This article was first published at ConfidentialDaily.com. Nation First republishes it because Fauci’s newly exposed messages raise grave questions about what health authorities knew, what they concealed, and whether pregnant women ever received genuine informed consent.

For years, pregnant women who worried that a COVID injection might harm their baby were treated as cranks. Doctors reassured them, fact-checkers shoved the concern into the misinformation bin, and anyone who kept asking questions risked being called an anti-vaxxer or conspiracy theorist. The experts had supposedly checked and found nothing worth worrying about.

Newly released messages from Anthony Fauci’s government phone expose how dishonest that certainty was. In January 2021, Fauci privately warned two other senior health officials that reactions after the second mRNA injection could induce miscarriage during the first trimester. He never gave that warning to the women being asked to take it.

Nine days later, Fauci told the public there were “no red flags” involving pregnant women. That was deception by omission, and it denied women the informed consent they had every right to expect.

• Fauci privately warned that second-dose reactions could theoretically induce first-trimester miscarriage.

• Nine days later, he publicly claimed there were “no red flags” for pregnant women.

• Pregnant women had been excluded from the original trials, leaving officials without controlled human pregnancy data.

• Health authorities and fact-checkers dismissed concerns that senior officials were privately discussing.

• Withholding this warning denied pregnant women the informed consent they deserved.

Anthony Fauci was the long-serving director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and one of the most powerful public officials of the COVID years. His television appearances were carried around the world, including in Australia. When he spoke about vaccines, governments, doctors, and the media listened.

The Pfizer and Moderna mRNA injections received emergency authorisation in America in December 2020, and the rollout began almost immediately. Yet pregnant women had been excluded from the original clinical trials. Officials had no controlled human trial data showing what the injections might do to a pregnancy, an unborn child, or the risk of miscarriage.

The manufacturers admitted the gap. The US Food and Drug Administration’s Moderna information for healthcare providers said the available data were “insufficient to inform vaccine-associated risks in pregnancy”. Pfizer used effectively the same warning when it announced a dedicated pregnancy trial in February 2021.

Women were already receiving the injections while those basic questions remained unanswered. A pregnant woman sitting in a clinic could hardly weigh a warning that the people in charge had chosen not to give her.

On 10 August 2026, US senators Ron Johnson and Rand Paul released an initial series of messages recovered from Fauci’s official phone. The four-page conversation took place on 25 and 26 January 2021. Fauci was speaking with Dr Rochelle Walensky, then director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Dr Vivek Murthy, who would become Joe Biden’s Surgeon General.

Murthy asked whether there was any medical reason to give pregnant women the vaccine earlier or later in pregnancy. He also wanted to know when reliable data about pregnancy risks would become available. Walensky sent back a mangled but unmistakable sentence:

“My understanding is that this is all a data free.”

Her wording was clumsy, but the meaning was plain. The data did not exist. Walensky explained that the CDC had set up a pregnancy registry to track women after vaccination, meaning the injections were being given while officials waited to learn what the pregnancy outcomes would be.

Fauci initially said there was no known reason to favour vaccination early or late in pregnancy. Less than two hours later, he came back with this:

“I asked around a bit more and another issue came up that you need to be aware of. Since many people have significant cytokines storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.”

Those are Fauci’s own words, preserved in the officially released text chain. He had asked around, identified a way in which the second injection could end a pregnancy, and warned two of America’s most senior health officials about it. This concern came from Fauci himself, inside the highest levels of the US health bureaucracy.

Walensky replied: “Definitely a good point, esp after dose two.“ Murthy agreed, calling it “a really good point re the cytokine storm post second dose“. Nobody in that conversation brushed the warning aside as nonsense.

The following day, Murthy raised the World Health Organisation’s advice against the routine use of Moderna’s injection during pregnancy because the necessary data did not exist. The guidance issued at the time said it should generally be avoided unless a woman faced enough personal danger from COVID to outweigh the possible vaccine risks.

Fauci replied that the risks and benefits had to be weighed. He pointed to animal toxicology studies, said more than 10,000 pregnant women had already been vaccinated, and claimed no problems had arisen. Murthy then said the WHO warning could be “potentially quite damaging to public confidence among pregnant women”.

By then, the conversation had moved beyond the medical issue to managing how pregnant women might react. Pregnancy data were missing, the WHO was urging caution, and Fauci had identified how the second dose could induce a first-trimester miscarriage. Public confidence had become part of the calculation. The women taking the injection deserved the full picture, but they never got it.

On 3 February 2021, nine days after that private exchange, Fauci appeared in an interview with the Journal of the American Medical Association. He acknowledged that pregnant women had been excluded from the original trials, then said the FDA had found:

“Thus far, and we’ve got to be careful, but thus far, no red flags about that, about pregnant women.”

The original JAMA interview transcript contains no mention of the first-trimester miscarriage warning. Fauci repeated the “no red flags” line on 10 February, saying about 20,000 pregnant women had received the injections. On 25 February, he offered the same reassurance, even while conceding that proper clinical trials involving pregnant women still had to be completed. CBS reported that exchange at the time.

By August, his language was stronger again. He said there was “no indication whatsoever” of increased adverse issues among vaccinated pregnant women and that it was “pretty clear” they should be vaccinated.

Fauci’s private and public messages do not match. With Walensky and Murthy, he named a particular danger and treated it seriously enough to pass on. In front of the public, he buried it beneath a general assurance that there were no red flags. Women could not make an informed choice when a senior official withheld the very warning he had circulated among his colleagues.

Pfizer’s confidential post-authorisation report covered adverse event reports received through 28 February 2021. It recorded 270 unique pregnancies, with outcomes that included 23 spontaneous abortions, two spontaneous abortions with intrauterine death, one spontaneous abortion with neonatal death, and two premature births followed by neonatal death. Only one normal outcome was recorded. No outcome was provided for the other 238 pregnancies.

Those figures could not support sweeping certainty because the outcome of nearly every pregnancy was unknown. Pfizer still concluded that no safety signal had emerged. The figures appear in the company’s post-authorisation adverse event analysis, which was later made public through litigation.

A later CDC and FDA surveillance paper documented 3,462 pregnancy-related reports made to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System through October 2021. They included 878 spontaneous abortions, 62 stillbirths, 76 premature deliveries, 12 neonatal deaths, and eight maternal deaths. The published paper said it had found no concerning pattern.

Each entry described an event reported during or after a pregnancy. The list included the deaths of mothers and babies. Those reports deserved open investigation and honest discussion, yet the broad assurances continued while people who raised the issue were mocked or dismissed.

While Fauci, Walensky, and Murthy discussed miscarriage among themselves, the public was being trained to regard the subject as disinformation. On 18 February 2021, AFP published a fact check aimed at social-media posts about miscarriages reported after vaccination. It leaned on the CDC’s statement that there was no evidence of an increase and stressed that a report did not prove causation. The AFP article appeared three weeks after Fauci’s private warning. Concerned citizens who warned others of the risk were subsequently deplatformed on social media.

Australia’s ABC, working with the now-defunct RMIT Fact Check, went further. A June 2021 article put pregnancy concerns under the heading of “debunked misinformation” and promoted related coverage as “Vaccine miscarriage myths”. The ABC article repeated the claim that surveillance had found no significant safety concerns at any stage of pregnancy. In plain words, they broadcast a lie, albeit one they swallowed hook, line, and sinker because it came from health authorities. That doesn’t exonerate the media and fact-checkers. They are supposed to thoroughly interrogate what they are being told but, when it came to the pandemic, they stopped questioning and just became a propaganda machine.

Because of the ABC and the RMIT Fact Lab, Australians who asked whether the injections could contribute to miscarriage were treated as though they were conspiracy theorists and also deplatformed from social media. Anthony Fauci had already raised it at the top of the American public-health establishment. He simply kept it inside the room.

Fauci’s defenders now reach for observational studies published after the rollout and insist the controversy has been manufactured. But those later papers cannot go back in time and provide informed consent to a woman making an irreversible medical decision in early 2021.

In early 2021, controlled pregnancy data did not exist. The manufacturers said the evidence was insufficient, and the WHO urged caution. Fauci had identified how the second dose could induce first-trimester miscarriage, while Walensky and Murthy agreed that the point mattered. None of that reached the women expected to make the decision.

Informed consent means telling a patient what is known, what dangers have been identified, and where the evidence is missing. Hiding a warning while waiting for later data makes consent meaningless, especially when officials are branding worried women as victims of misinformation even as they discuss the same concern in private.

Senator Ron Johnson put the basic failure plainly after releasing the messages: “You don’t wait a day, months, or years to inform the public of potential dangers.“ He is right. Fauci knew that reactions following the second mRNA injection could induce miscarriage during the first trimester, and Walensky and Murthy knew he had raised it. Yet, pregnant women heard “no red flags“ and, without a doubt, the lives of innocent unborn children were lost as a result.

A woman cannot consent to a risk she has never been told about. Whatever excuses are offered now, Fauci’s decision to keep that warning from all of us belongs in the public record. So does the treatment of everyone who asked questions about the jab and miscarriages before his private messages finally came out.

Fauci himself belongs in jail.

Until next time, God bless you, your family and nation.

Take care,

A Nation First Staff Writer

George Christensen is a former Australian politician, a Christian, freedom lover, conservative, blogger, podcaster, journalist and theologian. He has been feted by the Epoch Times as a “champion of human rights” and his writings have been praised by Infowars’ Alex Jones as “excellent and informative”.

George believes Nation First will be an essential part of the ongoing fight for freedom:

“The time is now for every proud patriot to step to the fore and fight for our freedom, sovereignty and way of life. Information is a key tool in any battle and the Nation First newsletter will be a valuable tool in the battle for the future of the West.”

— George Christensen.

Find more about George at his www.georgechristensen.com.au website.

NOTE: Due to the large volume of emails I receive, it is not possible to email me and ask to be unsubscribed from this newsletter. You must do it yourself by following the simple processes listed below:

• How do I cancel my paid subscription on Substack?

• How do I unsubscribe from a free subscription?