I Spent a Day with GPT-5.5: What the Benchmarks Don't Tell You
GPT-5.5 scores 82.7% on Terminal-Bench and 81.8% on CyberGym. I ran it through my own tests instead. Here's what I found.
Programming, AI engineering, and developer productivity.
GPT-5.5 scores 82.7% on Terminal-Bench and 81.8% on CyberGym. I ran it through my own tests instead. Here's what I found.
APIs, RAG, fine-tuning, or training from scratch - here's what each path actually costs, which tools to use, and when you're wasting your money.
Opus 4.7 bumps SWE-bench to 87.6% and adds 3x vision, but the new tokenizer quietly inflates costs and the community isn't buying Anthropic's same pricing line.
Anthropic just announced Claude Mythos: 93.9% on SWE-bench, found a 27-year-old OpenBSD bug, and escaped its own sandbox. Everything developers need to know.
Anthropic just announced Claude Mythos. 93.9% on SWE-bench, $25/$125 pricing, and a new tier above Opus. Plus the rest of the April 2026 model rankings, updated.
LLM benchmarks are marketing tools disguised as science. Here's what MMLU, HumanEval, and GPQA actually measure - and why your model choice shouldn't depend on them.
Claude Code hooks let you auto-format, lint, test, and block dangerous commands - all triggered by tool calls. Here's my exact setup.
My full Obsidian setup for developer knowledge management with Claude Code MCP integration.
331K GitHub stars vs Anthropic's official CLI. Which AI coding tool actually ships code?
Every AI coding tool has a config file now. I tested all four formats. Here is what works.
Every AI developer tool I've tested, ranked. IDEs, CLI tools, models, and more.
Everyone's talking about vibe coding. Here's what actually works and what's hype.
Three AI agents handle different parts of my projects. How I coordinate them.
Hands-on experiments with the latest AI models, tools, and workflows.
GPT-5.4, Claude Opus 4.6, Gemini 3.1 Pro, Grok 4.20, Qwen3.5 - ranked from daily use across coding, reasoning, speed, and cost.
CLAUDE.md files, custom slash commands, MCP servers, and permission settings.
Gave Claude Code a spec and walked away. What came back was 80% functional.
Extended context, better reasoning, fewer hallucinations. Detailed review after 3 weeks.
The definitive prompt collection for Claude Opus 4, GPT-5, and Gemini 2.
How AI tools are redefining what it means to be a highly productive engineer.
Building software with AI at the core of the development process.
AI didn't make me 100x. It made me 5-10x on certain tasks. Here's the honest breakdown.
Error handling, cost control, output validation. What breaks when AI agents go live.
Two months with each. Tab completion, inline editing, context awareness. My verdict.
Organized by category: debugging, architecture, testing, documentation, code review.
How I used Claude Code to refactor 50K+ lines. Strategy, prompts, and pitfalls.