Defendant Makes Major Move in Charlie Kirk Murder Case

For more access to expert legal analysis, official court documents and breaking news coverage only available here at the intersection of law and politics, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Tyler Robinson, accused of killing Charlie Kirk, is trying to take the death penalty off the table before his case is even sent to trial — and his lawyers’ argument is jarring: that he “hit the intended target” and so endangered no one else. Former homicide prosecutor and Resident Legal Diva Melba Pearson explains why Utah’s entire capital case rests on a single aggravating factor, why “he was too good a shot” is a real legal argument and not just a talking point, and why the thin state of Utah law makes the September 1st probable-cause ruling far less predictable than the headlines suggest.

Follow