For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]

This site does not allow itself to be embedded. You can still read it on the original site — the toolbar below keeps your place in the directory.

Hello, I was curious about the differences you can get from the human reviewers and the llms. Any insight is welcome, thank you! submitted by /u/obliviousphoenix2003 [link] [comments]

Read on reddit.com ↗