Op-Ed
Hector Sharp
Legal adviser at Legal Action Worldwide
Lily Sparks
Humanitarian advocacy professional with Action Against Hunger
In 2006, at the height of the Sri Lankan civil war, 17 Action Against Hunger workers were executed at point-blank range while providing drinking water to local communities. Since then, humanitarian work has been profoundly disrupted, write two legal advisers, calling on states to protect the profession.
Published today at 10:22 am (Paris) 3 min read Lire en français
Subscribers only
Humanitarians are there when crises hit; when natural disasters strike, wars break out, hunger spreads. They are a lifeline for communities whose lives have been torn apart, helping them rebuild homes, livelihoods, communities. But what happens when those who help come under attack?
Twenty years ago, on August 4, 2006, a team of 17 humanitarians working for Action Against Hunger in Muttur, Sri Lanka, were forced to kneel, before being shot in the back of the head at close range in their compound. They had been in Muttur providing clean drinking water. The "Muttur massacre," as it became known, sent shockwaves through the humanitarian community globally.
In the days following the attack, Action Against Hunger offices were overwhelmed with messages of condolences from heads of non-governmental organizations (NGOs), United Nations commissioners and diplomats. It was considered by all as an attack on humanity. Many expressed outrage, while others expressed concern – how could humanitarians continue their vital work in the world's most dangerous places knowing that they could be targeted at any moment?
The Muttur massacre became emblematic of the collapse of humanitarian protection in Sri Lanka and a turning point for humanitarian access and security. In September 2007, the Norwegian Refugee Council published a report noting that the humanitarian space in Sri Lanka had been steadily shrinking since 2006, stating that "aid workers are finding themselves being increasingly targeted in the brutal conflict [between the government and Tamil separatists]."
Defining failure of justice
As humanitarian organizations left the region, humanitarian access narrowed, movement restrictions intensified, and agencies reduced field operations due to insecurity. Communities already affected by conflict and displacement faced increasing difficulty accessing aid and services. The disruption of humanitarian operations contributed to exacerbated malnutrition, untreated illness, water-borne disease, and civilian vulnerability.
You have 60.98% of this article left to read. The rest is for subscribers only.

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.