2 min read
When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
Takeaways
- If you set a particular metric as a goal (e.g., lines of code written, number of features closed), people will find ways to optimize for that metric.
- Metrics are proxies for what you value (productivity, quality, etc.). Once they’re targets, people meet the metric even if it undermines the original intent.
- Metrics are useful for insight, but they must be used in context and balanced with qualitative judgment.
- Combine multiple metrics to avoid a singular focus that can be gamed.
Overview
Goodhart’s Law comes from economics and is very relevant to software teams. For instance, a manager might set a target that “we must close 100 bug tickets this month.” Developers, feeling pressure, might start closing tickets that are not truly resolved or splitting a single bug into multiple tickets to inflate numbers.
The metric (tickets closed) goes up, but software quality might not. Making the metric a goal distorts the process, so it loses its correlation with actual success. This is why experienced leaders use metrics as indicators rather than targets, and always consider the broader context.
Goodhart’s Law
Examples
A software team was rewarded based on the lines of code written. Developers start writing verbose code and copying and pasting into multiple places (violating DRY) to increase the line count. The software becomes bloated while the metric looks great.
Another example: a QA team measured by the number of test cases executed favored running many easy tests rather than doing proper testing. They met objectives but missed critical bugs.
Similarly, when teams focus on code coverage percentage as a primary target, developers write trivial unit tests that do not assert meaningful behavior, while necessary integration tests are skipped.
A recent variant is measuring AI tokens consumed per engineer (a practice sometimes called tokenmaxxing), where more tokens are considered better and token counts even become goals that people need to fulfill for their performance reviews.
Origins
Named after economist Charles Goodhart, who originally described this phenomenon in the context of monetary policy metrics. Marilyn Strathern later provided the commonly cited phrasing: “When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.”
This concept has been discussed extensively in education and business KPIs, and certainly applies to software engineering metrics where velocity, code coverage, and bug counts are often used as targets.
Further Reading
Goodhart's Law: How Measuring The Wrong Things Drive Immoral Behaviour Deep dive into Goodhart's Law and its implications for organizations
Goodhart's Law - Wikipedia Overview of the law's origins and applications
The Tyranny of Metrics Jerry Muller's book on the unintended consequences of metric fixation
Enshittification - Wikipedia How platforms degrade quality once metrics replace user value as the goal
Want to go deeper?
All 63+ laws are covered with more depth, examples, and practical guidance in the Laws of Software Engineering book.
Last updated: July 20, 2026

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.