They Know They Are Losing

As the wheels continue to fly off the careening “trans” cart, we will begin to see a retreat on previously asserted no debate positions alongside sheepishly feeble demands from cross-dressers and fetishists that the world still owes them submission.

It’s important we remember that to tolerate any of it is to allow all of it. The only solution is total rejection, no matter how much these men, in particular, whine and cajole as a way to appeal to our sympathy.

The most salient example of this currently unfolding phenomenon recently occurred at a Substack named The Argument, which published a fairly widely read article hilariously entitled “I don’t need you to believe I’m a woman” by a man calling himself “Cassie” Pritchard.

It is linked below and should be read in its entirety for the full story.

This is a revealing glimpse into the current mindset of these men as they recognize the jig, so to speak, is up, and it is imperative we acknowledge its implications as we move forward.

Picture, if you will, a man who claims to be a woman. That means he’s just a man.

He describes himself as a Labor organizer, democratic socialist, and compulsive takester on his Substack account.

Here is Mr. Pritchard’s profile pic on X.

He kind of passes, right? Well…

This is what he looks and sounds like as demonstrated on a recent podcast.

His profile pic is heavily altered and filtered, and all online images of cross-dressers should be assumed to be so because the public display of perversion in pursuit of deception, even when it obviously fails, is their raison d’être.

Almost none of these men pass, and it’s impossible to hide this when it comes to non-manipulated video and audio.

His X handle username is “@hecubian_devil.”

Cassandra, of course, was a Trojan princess and prophetic priestess of Apollo. Since she spurned Apollo’s advances, he cursed her so no one would heed her warnings. Hecuba, who had 19 children according to legend, was the mother of Cassandra.

Mr. Pritchard chose quite the legacy with which to associate, and it’s notable because the ancient Greeks undoubtedly understood the difference between women and men, just like everyone else does. This name would be a case of stolen valor.

No matter. Mr. Pritchard spends his time online discussing socialism, politics, and Zohran Mamdani, the mayor of New York City.

He also appears to hit on random women who post suggestive photos.

Remember, this is “trans,” so we’re probably lucky he’s not filming himself twerking in front of toddlers.

It appears he’s a standard issue heterosexual male cross-dressing pervert, very different from the homosexual male cross-dressing pervert.

He also quite gracefully honors people who point out his double chin.

Naturally, he’s the right man to comment on the political realities of the current state of the industrialized cult known as “trans.”

Mr. Pritchard dedicates a fair deal of the article to analysis of recent survey results which show decreasing support for what men like him have demanded, from bathrooms to sports to child mutilation.

What he does not admit, because he cannot, is that we have been lied to by men like him and institutions like the media and healthcare industry for quite some time.

We were told things like this is a medical condition (it isn’t), there’s a tiny percentage of true trans (there isn’t), and gender and sex are totally different (nonsensical).

And then there was the coup de grâce, and we should all remember this one…TRANS WOMEN ARE WOMEN. It was a non-negotiable, a maxim, a mantra, screamed in the face of the world amidst threats of suicide and repeated acts of violence.

Except guess what…it turns out it was a lie and TERFs were right the whole time.

We saw manslabs like William “Lia” Thomas destroy women’s swimming and Imane Khelif wreck women’s boxing.

We heard the harrowing stories from medical abuse survivors like Layla Jane, Chloe Cole, and Prisha Mosley. These were children, and in some cases adults over 18, who were chewed up and spit out by a wholly uncaring industry with its eyes firmly fixed on profits rather than the suffering of people who need real help, not breast removal or testosterone.

We saw the behavior of insane and entitled deviants who want to use women’s bathrooms to justify their misogyny fetish, including recently in Brazil, a country whose judiciary just sentenced Bianca Barreto to two years in prison for calling a male politician in a dress a man (since he is).

We can’t unsee these things. These are the truth.

The fraud just could not persist in the face of such an obviously crushing reality.

Now Mr. Pritchard has broken and concedes he doesn’t need anyone to believe he’s a woman, even though that was the iron-clad requirement to be a kind person™ just five minutes ago.

The disgusting behavior of adherents of his cultish agenda and these preposterous antics proved they aren’t women, so they have no one to blame but themselves, but he won’t admit it explicitly even if he thinks he’s one of the good ones.

There is no other way this could have gone because it is the nature of the beast since there is no limiting principle to this fraud.

But he should still have the right to do whatever he wants to serve his fetish no matter how stupid and destructive it is, right?

After conceding he doesn’t really want everyone to think he’s a woman, even though the “trans” fraud only exists insofar as others agree to participate in it, Mr. Pritchard then insists he should still be able to do whatever he wants because that’s the American way.

George Washington and Thomas Jefferson fought for the freedom of cross-dressing fetishistic men to be in women’s bathrooms. He may understand men like him have lost the American public with the demands of his vile agenda, but now appealing to the ever-attractive and nebulous ideas of “liberty” and “freedom” must work so the gullible hoi polloi will let him do whatever he wants…right?

Reader, regretfully for him, this is not the case.

There is no right for males to be in women’s spaces.

The Supreme Court recently ruled states can exclude males from female sports because that’s the purpose of female sports. It’s basic common sense, sadly not that common anymore.

He appeals, however, to the lofty concept of limited government, but don’t democratic socialists and labor organizers want more government? In that case, he would be inconsistent and dishonest. How curious:

Such an argument is classically American, in my view: against intrusive government overreach and in favor of sharing public space with people we may not agree with, like, or feel kinship with.

The freedom to pee in whatever bathroom you want may seem trivial compared to free speech or religious practice, but, like so many freedoms, curtailing it requires a distinctly un-American apparatus of mutual surveillance, control, and nuisance.

It’s classically American in his view because he’s nuts. He tries to compare men in women’s bathrooms to free speech and religion because, again, he’s nuts.

It’s not government overreach to keep men out of women’s bathrooms. It’s such a basic tenet of a functional society that it must be based upon reality, not delusion.

Women don’t care about sharing spaces with someone we disagree with or don’t feel kinship with because we care about keeping men out.

The opinion of those men are meaningless, and kinship has nothing to do with it. A woman of any opinion or kinship belongs in the women’s bathroom. No man does.

It wouldn’t take any apparatus to keep men like him out. How did it work for centuries before men like him were emboldened to be this ridiculous? It can only work by having a basic social contract so we understand the government, medical industry, and media don’t conspire to excuse and legitimize this fraud.

All men stay out because reality is more important than his right to be a pervert, and it’s not government overreach to say so.

He is the nuisance, and he must stop the nonsense by accepting reality.

He can use the men’s bathroom. That’s where he belongs.

The major question we must ask men like Mr. Pritchard is this—what exactly does this man want the right to do which he isn’t already doing?

He doesn’t have the right to use the women’s bathrooms, so what else is he truly requesting here?

Is he seeking the right to wear earrings or makeup or grow out his hair?

He already has those rights, and men have been doing this for millennia. Nobody cares about his hair length or if he wants to hide his receding hairline with hats or scarves.

It doesn’t even look like he took the time to put on some makeup or do his hair for the podcast interview, like he put on some lip gloss for the X profile pic. He couldn’t even manage some blush or even a Party City wig, it appears. Those are probably $50.00 at the most.

This is a non-issue.

Is he seeking the right to mutilate his body due to his mental illness no matter how damaging it is to himself or society?

If he showed up at a doctor’s office and demanded removal of his healthy leg or unlimited Xanax due to addiction or a transorbital lobotomy, he would be told no because doctors function within a heavily regulated system. Adults cannot do whatever they want to themselves when it comes to surgery, medications, and health insurance.

He acknowledges he does not pass, but he still somehow obtained chest implants within our ridiculously corrupt healthcare system:

But here’s the thing: I like lesbian orgies, my sex-worker friends, and my natural baritone voice that juxtaposes strangely (for most people) with my 540 cc breast implants.

I long ago realized that passing as a cis woman was not possible for me — and I wasn’t willing to put in the work even if it were. I’m trans, I’m odd, and I don’t have much interest in hiding either fact.

If he shows up anywhere, it would cease to be a lesbian anything because he’s a man.

And do democratic socialist labor organizers earn huge salaries? Who paid for those? Was it Medicaid, which means it was taxpayers?

If and when “gender dysphoria” is deleted from the DSM, males are not allowed to claim to be female in legal documents for all practical purposes, and health insurance does not cover cosmetic procedures, why should men like this be allowed such ridiculous breast implants? If he’s going to use them to justify his unwanted presence in women’s bathrooms, not to mention prisons or locker rooms or spas, then he can be told no, just like he would be told no if he requested healthy leg removal.

If men like him want to use the government to force this fraud with the clear resulting damage and chaos, then we can use basic regulation and common sense to stop the fraud in order to prevent damage and chaos. Telling a lie is not the same as not telling a lie, so the situations are not comparable.

Ultimately, the answer is no. He just doesn’t want to hear it, but fairly soon he will have no choice.

The comments left under this article were heartening because quite a few expressed a healthy skepticism due to unfolding events we just can’t ignore. The zeitgeist has changed so much in the past few years that it’s unstoppable, and the deluge of truth can only continue.

In the spirit of Mr. Pritchard’s handy dandy chart, here’s some helpful graphics for readers to understand the developing nature of this agenda into the future.

Here’s the percentage of men who have successfully “transitioned” to women.

Here’s the percentage of people have been proven to be “true trans” under coherent and objective criteria and testing.

Here’s the percentage of people born in the wrong body.

Here’s the percentage of men who belong in women’s bathrooms.

Get the picture?

Women like Kara Dansky, Sall Grover, and Jennifer Sey are more like Cassandra than Mr. Pritchard because they are actual women, and they also tell the truth, unlike a cross-dressing miscreant such as him.

People are starting to listen to the pushback because we are correct, and we are ahead of the curve, which does not go over well with men like him because when this fraud implodes he will have to keep his cross-dressing and deviancy to himself and within his private residence.

It won’t be easy, but there is no other way to solve this.

Mr. Pritchard can use the men’s bathrooms, specifically after he gets his absurd breast implants removed. And if he wants to make himself stand out by putting on lipstick or cheap fool’s gold hoop earrings, that’s his problem. That’s true American self-reliance.

James Madison and Benjamin Franklin would be proud.