Yesterday, I shared an intuitive, pattern-based analysis of heightened tension, visibility, and risk for certain public figures. I was clear then — and I’ll be clear again now — that this work is observational, not predictive certainty, and never a wish for harm.
Since that post, Maxwell Frost has been publicly reported as having been attacked.
I want to say this plainly:
I do not take satisfaction in this.
I did not want this outcome.
And I would always prefer to be wrong when safety is involved.
I really wish I could just be public medium that spiritually bypasses reality but I don’t. It isn’t the 1990’s anymore.
When analysis and intuition aligns with real-world events, it can feel unsettling — not because it proves anything mystical or absolute, but because it reminds us how pressure, exposure, and volatility often converge before incidents occur. Patterns don’t cause events; they signal conditions.
That distinction matters.
Links:
Maxwell Frost News:
Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/jan/25/congressman-maxwell-alejandro-frost-attack-police
The Atlantic: https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/01/maxwell-frost-assault/685750/
TMZ: https://www.tmz.com/2026/01/25/maxwell-frost-assault-sundance-man-arrested-racist/
New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/01/25/us/maxwell-alejandro-frost-assaulted-sundance-festival.html
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.