Update: Thank You for Your Patience (And Here's Why the Wait Will Be Worth It)

I hope you had a wonderful holiday season. Before anything else, I want to thank you sincerely for your patience. It’s been a couple of months since my last post, and I owe you an honest accounting of what’s been happening behind the scenes—not just with the content you’re waiting for, but with the fundamental architecture that will make consistent, high-quality work actually possible.

Pledge your support

Let me start with what needs to be said plainly: I made promises about the Agenda 47 Explained series that I didn’t keep. A year ago, I committed to delivering the fuller series in a timely way, and that simply didn’t happen. The reasons are real—the birth of my son in March 2025, the demands of supporting my family, the necessity of work outside this project—but reasons aren’t excuses, and I take full responsibility for not meeting the expectations I set.

At the same time, I want you to know that the delay hasn’t been wasted time. While I wasn’t publishing, I was continuing my research and greatly expanding and refining the models that undergird both Agenda 47 Explained and Cultology. What you’ll eventually receive will be substantially richer, deeper, and more comprehensive because of this work. The patience you’ve shown is going to pay dividends in ways I couldn’t have delivered a year ago.

As many of you know, my approach to this work is research-intensive. The last time I counted my personal notes earlier in 2025, I had accumulated around 6,500 pages. At this point, that number is likely closer to 7,500 pages, and that doesn’t include the many books, research papers, and articles I’ve been processing through various systems.

The method I use—what I call an omniological approach—requires understanding a subject from as many angles as possible, modeling it within my own conceptual frameworks (building intrinsic knowledge), and then integrating it with other domains until I can reason about it intrinsically rather than relying on authoritative statements or surface-level explanations. The benefit of this methodology is that it produces extremely robust frameworks with the capacity to model and explain almost anything. The downside is that it takes substantial time, and translating that depth into accessible, readable content has always been the bottleneck.

Over the past several months, I’ve intentionally slowed down new research acquisition so I could focus on solving what has become the central problem: how do I reliably turn this mountain of research into consistent, high-quality content that maintains conceptual rigor while remaining approachable to readers across a wide spectrum of backgrounds?

Since advanced AI tools became available, I’ve been experimenting with ways to use them not merely to accelerate research, but to help organize, cross-link, synthesize, and eventually produce content without sacrificing accuracy or depth. I currently use a combination of tools—ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok, Claude, and Google’s NotebookLM—to work through this vast body of material, each with unique capabilities suited to different aspects of the work. But, let me be clear: I never blindly rely on outputs from these tools; every word is carefully assess with my personal hands.

Once I learned how to use these tools effectively—a real breakthrough happened in 2025—it created something like a quantum leap in my ability to review and model information while still managing the demands of family life, raising my son (who’s approaching his first birthday now), and supporting my household.

That said, AI has real and significant limitations. It hallucinates. It makes errors. It can introduce inaccuracies that, if unchecked, would undermine the entire project. So a major part of this work has been building systems that minimize those failures rather than pretending they don’t exist, and at the same time, manually correcting and reworking everything to make it my own. The goal isn’t to automate content creation—it’s to leverage AI as a force multiplier while maintaining human involvement, oversight, verification, and the irreplaceable elements of voice and judgment that can’t be delegated to algorithms. Everything you get from my content is a genuine and authentic expression of what I think and have been working on.

Over the past three months, I’ve been developing and testing what is now the third generation of my research organization and content production system. Each prior iteration taught me something crucial, but this latest version has finally solved several major structural problems:

• Managing massive data libraries in a way that makes them navigable and genuinely usable for writing

• Allowing AI assistance without surrendering accuracy or losing my voice

• Preserving conceptual depth while dramatically improving accessibility

• Creating workflows that can produce consistent output rather than sporadic bursts

I recently ran a test case on the next article in the Cultology series I was working on, and the results were honestly staggering. The use of these tools and systems accelerated and improved the work by orders of magnitude. Despite the delays—and I know they’ve been frustrating—the wait is going to be worth it. This system will allow me to generate much richer, deeper, and more frequent content once it’s fully operational and tested.

For the first time, I could maintain the full conceptual sophistication while making the material genuinely readable for almost anyone. Whether you’re deeply technical and philosophically inclined, or you’re just beginning to explore these ideas, my goal is that the upcoming content will meet you where you are without watering anything down. The pedagogical spiral staircase approach I use allows me to introduce concepts accessibly and then deepen them recursively (layer after layer), so that readers at different levels of familiarity can all find value.

I’m currently running an alpha test of this third-generation system, and the early results are very promising. If things continue to track as they have been, an ambitious estimate is that I’ll begin releasing new content within the next month or two. I will be able release Cultology and Agenda 47 Explained installments in parallel. Both series draw from the same deep research foundation, and the system I’m building serves them both.

If you’ve recently discovered my work and aren’t familiar with both series, let me provide some essential context on the foundation they’re built on and what each project explores.

At the core of everything I do is what I call Omniology—an attempt to understand myself, the nature of reality, the purpose of life, and how the understanding of truth in all its forms can improve everything from living with your family to running a business to organizing civilization itself. This isn’t abstract philosophy for its own sake. It’s a deep interest in the pursuit of truth and a commitment to follow it wherever it leads, no matter how uncomfortable or challenging the destination might be.

I’ve been interested in these questions all my life—trying to understand people, society, families, why people do what they do, how economies work, spanning topics from physics and biology to philosophy and information systems. A personal event in 2010 greatly accelerated this research, and over the past 16 years in earnest, I’ve developed what I believe are very robust systems for modeling all of this research into a cohesive and ever-expanding body of knowledge.

This work has given me insight into how human beings function at a psychological level, how social systems operate, how economies and businesses work, and how civilizations themselves are structured. More specifically, I’ve come to understand how parasitic systems can be used to hijack human potential—turning people into engines of labor, innovation, knowledge, and technology extraction. All of the things a human being has the potential to offer can be parasitically drained by an ever-advancing and increasingly sophisticated control architecture, one that hides itself within a cloak of false freedom and prosperity.

At the same time, by understanding these parasitic mechanisms in detail, I’ve also been able to understand what a truly symbiotic system actually looks like—not just painting dreams or alluding vaguely to a brighter future, but being able to describe in granular, actionable detail what that future looks like, how we get there, and what the atomic components of such a civilization would be. This allows us to know at a deep and meaningful level what we’re actually working toward.

When Donald Trump entered the political scene in 2015, I began to wonder whether we might be witnessing competition between elite groups unfolding on the world stage. This question became the catalyst for exploring how the research I’d been developing could be applied to understanding contemporary power structures and the potential for large-scale civilizational transformation.

Both of the series I’m working on—Cultology and Agenda 47 Explained—are ways to express and share this much deeper body of research that I generally refer to as Omniology.

Cultology is the name I gave the project that serves as a unified field theory for analyzing the mechanics of relationships, power, and belief systems across all scales of human activity. It is the pathology of Omniology (how everything can be affected when parasitic systems gain control), investigating what happens when relationships are hijacked and the flow of truth is obstructed.

The core thesis is simple: any system that interrupts the natural flow of truth and growth is cult-like, and therefore parasitic.

Cultology is designed to explore parasitic versus symbiotic relationships across every scale of human experience—from the relationship between yourself and your own mind or soul, through dyadic relationships (you and your spouse, you and your child, you and your business partner, you and your friend), all the way up through families, businesses, institutions, and civilization itself. Because civilization is essentially composed of all the relationships operating within it, we can understand how a civilization trends toward parasitic or symbiotic functioning by understanding these relationships at every level.

The entire framework is built on a moral and epistemic dichotomy that governs all social structures:

The Parasitic Modality — A cult is defined not by size or ritual, but by its reliance on extrinsic knowledge: rigid beliefs enforced by social pressure and fear of exclusion. This epistemic closure (rigid dogmatic thinking) suppresses the human drive for inquiry and leads to the parasitic extraction of benefits and energy. Cultic systems intentionally design social structures to prevent people from finding God (or diluting the true nature thereof)—the ultimate source of truth and alignment—replacing authentic purpose with surrogate crystallized worldviews and performance-based identities. Every parasitic social order is essentially a counterfeit transcendence mechanism.

The Symbiotic Modality — The opposite of a cult is a symbiotic system. These systems are truth-centered and cultivate what I call the intrinsic path, which demands continual inquiry and openness to all information, empowering individuals through discernment rather than control. Symbiosis is defined by the full flourishing of human relationships into their ideal state, marked by freedom, honesty, creativity, and mutual benefit.

The series argues that modern civilization is itself a macro-cult (an advanced parasitic system), functioning as a distributed cultic architecture that operates across families, businesses, governments, and global institutions.

Cultology operationalizes its analysis using several key, interlinked models:

• The Four Intimacies define the total field of human interaction and value exchange: Physical, Emotional, Intellectual, and Spiritual. Intellectual intimacy is the keystone and immune system for the others. Cults systematically corrupt these intimacies, turning authentic connection into extrinsic dependency.

• Ontology of Being describes the structure of being from Personality → Soul → Mind → Emotion → Physical Expression. Cults execute what I call a corruption cascade, hijacking the core personality spark and inverting the entire value system.

• Contractual Formalism recognizes that all relationships are energetic, epistemic, and moral contracts. Symbiotic systems rely on honorable contracts that are mutual, transparent, and revocable, while cults use counterfeit contracts that hollow out genuine consent.

The strategic scope of Cultology follows a natural arc: early articles define the framework and show cult anatomy across scales (from Jonestown to families to businesses), middle articles detail the mechanics of the intrinsic versus extrinsic path and the comprehensive Four Intimacies model, and later articles scale the analysis to the state, the parasitic economy, global elite structures, and culminate in a blueprint for a symbiotic future.

The linguistic strategy is deliberate: the term “cult” is retained as a highly recognizable memetic handle, but it is immediately redefined via semantic rehabilitation to function as a precise investigative lens for social pathology rather than a pejorative label. In other words, Cultology is far more than an series about cults. It explores human relationships and civilizations and everything that goes into them, and most importantly, how they go wrong and what is needed to make them right.

Agenda 47 Explained sits on top of the Cultology framework and is designed to look at much of the same foundational research, but through a different lens: the hypothesis that Donald Trump might represent—though we cannot know for certain—the public face of an elite group attempting to transform society from parasitic to symbiotic.

This series is not political advocacy disguised as analysis. It’s hypothesis-testing in real time, using contemporary events as a laboratory for exploring what large-scale civilizational transformation would actually look like if it were genuinely happening. The series focuses primarily on exploring this possibility not because I’m politically partisan, but because it provides an extraordinarily powerful lens for examining:

• What symbiotic versus parasitic civilization looks like at the societal, economic, and civilizational scale

• What strategic requirements would be necessary for successfully executing such a transition

• What the ultimate endgames are for both potential elite groups—those pursuing symbiotic transformation and those maintaining parasitic control

• Why seemingly strange phenomena in geopolitics and media occur, explained through models that I believe offer heretofore unexplored insights

I maintain intellectual honesty throughout this exploration. The nature of operations at this scale—if they are indeed occurring—would necessarily involve significant operational security, psychological operations, and strategic maneuvering that makes it nearly impossible for outside observers to know with certainty what’s actually happening. It’s entirely possible that Trump represents a competing parasitic group rather than a symbiotic one. However, there are good reasons to believe he might not be, and the series explores that possibility most thoroughly while remaining intellectually honest about the uncertainty.

As I argue in the series, Trump’s stated agenda is sweeping and civilization-transforming. It appears designed to reverse decades, if not centuries, of what I call globalist development projects that were crafted to entice humanity onto a technocratic plantation. This plantation adorns itself in modern conveniences and quality of life improvements that provide real benefits—electricity, medical systems, clean water, food, education—while simultaneously causing participants to become dependent on the system’s control mechanisms.

These benefits act as the shell of a Trojan horse, concealing the much more toxic and freedom-destroying payload of the parasitic vision. While we enjoy modern amenities, we become reliant on hidden hands who supply them, and we often find ourselves defending that reliance when someone dares to speak of the greater threat that has been intentionally hidden from view.

Modern society has been turned into a sophisticated net meant to deceive, entrap, and ultimately destroy any hope of genuine freedom. Even worse, generations born into this system forget what freedom actually looked like, eventually confusing the meager benefits of their free-range plantation with freedom and prosperity itself. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, for instance, the coal miners of West Virginia lived in decentralized independent communities where barter, trade, and freedom from centralized government were the norm. Within a generation, wealthy industrialists had invaded and conquered these peaceful communities, and today their descendants have almost entirely forgotten their once-idyllic lives, believing instead that modern industrial dependency represents progress. And yet, this isn’t to say that true freedom requires technological avoidance. Properly understood and mastered, all technology can serve mankind and improve freedom and prosperity.

In this series, I explain from my perspective how and why Agenda 47 could work if it represents what Trump claims, and I also illuminate what we were intentionally deprived of as a people. We have been robbed of our birthright—the very knowledge and wisdom our forefathers gave their lives to discover and safeguard, the wisdom God poured out in the form of truth for all who will claim it as their own. Once we fully rediscover and reclaim the truth about what a free and rule-of-law-based society actually is, the enslavers—whoever they ultimately are—who have weaponized nearly everything in this world will never again be able to deceive us, provided we remain eternally vigilant.

And of course, it goes without saying that no matter what camp you sit in with respect to the politically charged topics of the day, I think we can all agree that each of us reclaiming our rights and learning to be responsible through vigilance is what we need to do to make sure that whatever power structure is at play in our world, we have the ability to keep it accountable and work toward creating a system that is truly symbiotic and free.

Cultology serves as the comprehensive foundational framework, exploring parasitic versus symbiotic dynamics across all scales of relationship and social organization. Agenda 47 Explained is a case study that sits on top of that framework, applying those same models and research to contemporary political events and power structures through the lens of a specific hypothesis about Trump’s role.

Both series are built from the same deep body of research I’ve been developing for over 16 years. Both teach you how civilization works, how power operates, how parasitic systems function, and what genuine symbiosis would look like—regardless of whether Trump ultimately proves to be who he appears to be.

Whether you’re on the left or the right, pro-Trump or anti-Trump or undecided, spiritually inclined or deeply skeptical, these frameworks are designed to help you think more clearly and comprehensively about the world we’re actually living in. If you genuinely want to understand how civilization functions, how families and cultures are shaped, how belief systems influence reality, and what role we play within the larger cosmic structure, both series offer tools for that understanding.

Thank you again for your patience and for those who have supported this work over the years—you have my deepest gratitude. Your support has helped sustain my family while I continue this long and demanding project, and I don’t take that lightly.

What I’m building now isn’t just content. It’s an engine that will allow me to publish consistently, accurately, and at a level of quality I’ve always aimed for but couldn’t sustainably reach before. The wait has been longer than any of us wanted, but I genuinely believe it will have been worth it.

I hope your new year is off to a beautiful start, and I look forward to sharing the work that’s been developing behind the scenes. The best is yet to come.

With love,

Justin

Please tell me what you think or let me know if I got something wrong. I want to hear from you.

Leave a comment

Justin Deschamps is a researcher, omniologist, podcaster, and business consultant who has committed himself to restoring the knowledge, reason, and goodwill that helped the founding fathers create the greatest nation on earth.

Follow me on:

Telegram, Truth Social, X (Twitter), Pilled