(Image taken by member of the Prime Minister’s Office, April 25, 2018, Rideau Cottage, Ottawa.)
Dear Reader:
Download Link to Phone Call between Sophie Trudeau and myself
&
Link to Audio Transcript of Call, emails, evidence of termination timeline
It has taken me 4+ years to even begin to make sense of what happened with the investigations that I requested from the Hamilton Police in Ontario re: Trudeaus. I made my first request at the end of August, 2021. The cops raced to the house, eagerly requested a USB stick of my emails with Sophie Trudeau, and then vanished, but for one confusing phone call with Det/Sgt Knapp. I made a number of subsequent efforts to connect- even emailing subsequent evidence of Liberal Party wrongdoing- but nobody responded.
A little over a year later, journalist Robert Cribb (then of The Toronto Star) brought a well-known PI (Craig Bromell, aka The Copfather) with him to the house to discuss the situation. My letting Cribb know that I might take the story to Fox or Rebel News etc. seemed to sharpen his interest. At this meeting, the situation with the Hamilton Police was discussed. Bromell was shocked that I hadn’t heard back from Hamilton. He committed to going there to see his old friend from Toronto policing days, Chief Bergen. Before going, he asked for copies of the disconnection emails I had sent Mrs. Trudeau- and a copy of the phone call that she had requested and a transcript thereof.
Soon thereafter, Cribb contacted me to tell me that Bromell had been informed that the likely reason the Hamilton Police retreated was because the RCMP- who handles the PM and his family- had told them I had been stalking Mrs. Trudeau. Bromell then confirmed that the RCMP had told them that in a subsequent phone call with me. Being provided with evidence of the falsity of this information seemed to prompt HP into action, or so it appeared. A few weeks later, they commenced a second investigation into my allegations (January 10/23), one that began with my providing a lengthy (and seamless) video statement. Right afterwards, Detective Nathan Rowan brought me into a room where we confirmed next steps. I have never seen a police officer so nervous, as he anxiously attempted to persuade me that the USB stick I had provided (now lost) had been accidentally misplaced by Det/Sgt Knapp. I didn’t believe a word of it. I assumed it had been sent to the RCMP for their reading pleasure.
The next day (January 11/23), Global News announced that Trudeau and his cabinet were coming to Hamilton for a 3-day cabinet meeting commencing January 23rd (Wonders never cease!). On January 26th, I received an email from Detective Rowan calling off the investigation for yet another erroneous reason (something I said that was allegedly mentally questionable). And despite asking for a copy of my video statement, I still have not received it. So, two investigations called off by Hamilton et al.
In the summer of 2023, I wrote the Civilian Review & Complaints Commission for the RCMP to find out who made the stalking allegation, and to look into whether the RCMP played a role in the second obstruction of investigation. I heard back from the RCMP’s internal affairs dept (Sgt Martin in Milton), and was brought in to give another statement in the spring of 2024. Investigation #3 was now commenced. After receiving a number of monthly updates to the effect that the investigation was still in process, I received a letter in the autumn of 2024 canceling the investigation on the basis that my request had been “out of time.” In other words, I made the request too late. Now they tell me! (lol) Reasonable Interpretation: They investigated and found out who told the stalking lie, both within the RCMP and on the Trudeau team, and made up an “out of time” story to get rid of it. They clearly wanted to keep the unfounded stalking allegation alive.
In the meantime (and certainly thereafter), I endured all of the many things I shared in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen: My Unexpected Journey with Power, Politics, and the Global Elite' Among them: endless indicators of monitoring/surveillance, police and CRA harassment, shadow bans by Amazon and Meta, still persistent Zersetzung, a life-threatening medical event in the autumn of 2023 that was mistakenly characterized as an adverse reaction to prescriptions but that involved drugs, personal betrayal, and very likely the Hamilton Police. And a great many concrete indicators that this had been conveniently turned into an investigation of me, by those flying monkeys that protect nefarious political power.
Of course, there is nothing particularly unique about this. When politically motivated miscreants mess up royally and particularly when so many systems are involved, they invariably turn their attention to the complainant. They do everything they can to prove them mad, and/or bad, so that they lack credibility... and so that the data the cops manipulated looks genuine.
That this could happen systemically in Canada does not surprise me. Canada is built on a monarchistic foundation. Our local police and the RCMP are more beholden to Government, than the people. They will do anything if it pleases their Kings and Prime Ministers. And our media are now dependent on government subsidies to remain in business. So, there is nowhere to turn if the government acts out.
What I couldn’t figure out was how they justified this legally. In other words, how did my reporting a lengthy series of illegal events, become an inquiry into me? I mean, the cops could have feigned an investigation, and then said that nothing came of it. But they didn’t. They obstructed all 3 investigations. Why?
A conversation with Robert Cribb may have answered my question. In a lengthy phone conversation, Cribb floated the idea of an investigation into me as a possibility that resulted from the ‘stalking’ story never being formally (or properly) put to rest. The allegation was likely still sitting in the file from the Hamilton Police, making trouble for me. This makes sense to me as a viable basis for what followed. In order to get a judge’s order to turn this around and investigate me, the cops and the RCMP needed reasonable and probable grounds. They didn’t have that- I have no history with the police. So, they continued to abandon and obstruct investigations before completing them. This way, my formal statements and the emails that spoke to the stalking issue were evidentially null and void. This way, they could keep the stalking story alive as a possibility. Something to dangle to continually justify judicial authorization, especially after Mrs. Trudeau became single.
Of course, judicial orders are generally time-limited, but with stalking allegations, they can probably keep them open for a lot longer. Just in case. And if you have an intensely motivated crew of cops and contractors, all they have to do is manipulate data about who you are to keep it alive ad infinitum. I know that I have yet to receive a single letter notifying me of a completed investigation in the 5 + years since this all began. This suggests that it is still alive, and still serving a diversionary purpose for both the Trudeau and Carney administrations.
Fortunately, most of the relevant emails are in the book (including the one where she asked me to come to Ottawa to meet with her), and I have copies of the taped phone call when Sophie has a little cry at the end after I agree to remain connected because I am afraid not to. She requested the call so I would remain connected and calm her concerns around what my departure might mean for her husband’s political life. Looks like my fear in this situation was well-justified. Give the cops years to investigate anyone perceived to be a political threat, and you can be sure that they will find a way to make themselves look like Saints. It wouldn’t surprise me if they could even get a judge to agree to a vast array of monitoring techniques, just to be sure that the alleged stalker’s location was always known. I will speak more to that (and anyone close to me who enabled it) at a later date. What irony though- to be accused of stalking by professional stalkers. Canadians are now familiar with this kind of gaslighting with both of these allegedly Liberal administrations.
PHONE CALL WITH SOPHIE TRUDEAU
In fact, I made 3 efforts to terminate my connection with Sophie Gregoire Trudeau: (1) September 27, 2019; (2) December 5, 2020; (3) June 13, 2021. I have never stalked her, but she did have a difficult time letting me go. I have included the vaster context for all 3 efforts in the book. Apart from hundreds of emails, we only met once (at Rideau Cottage, for a filmed video dialogue (excerpts available on FB and IG) and private lunch that she requested) and we had one phone conversation (that she requested). The link for said call and more of the details around my disconnection efforts are included in the link(s) above. I had considered removing some parts of the audio call/related transcript but feel that it is essential to leave it all in, as it gives the listener/reader a clearer sense of the relational context.
WHY CORRECT THE PUBLIC, POLICING, AND JUDICIAL RECORD?
I wish to refute and put an end to the nonsensical suggestion that I stalked the Prime Minister’s wife. It is defamatory, reputation damaging, and especially unjust in a situation where I am the one who has been monitored, surveilled, shadow-banned, harassed, stalked. It was not me who was pushing to sustain the connection. It was entirely her. I did not feel contempt for her. I simply wanted to disconnect from her and her political world. I did not deserve to be lied about, nor to have core elements of a life I had worked so hard for, destroyed. My writing was quite literally saving lives, and these heinous acts not only put my life at risk, they limited my capacity to be of service to those in need. Shame on every single one of you who contributed to this.
THE PUBLIC INTEREST
There are many reasons why this I believe that this phone conversation and its related context is in the public interest. The Canadian people have every right to know what goes in with a Prime Minister and their partner(s), particularly things that may have electoral consequences for their administration and for subsequent administrations associated with the same party. This is particularly true with respect to events that involve their dynamics with citizens. Although the wife of a PM is not a formal, paid member of the government, Mrs. Trudeau was an unusually active participant in political matters. She was often on the road campaigning and advocating for aspects of the government’s agenda. She was deeply involved in and connected to the PMO (requiring permissions from them/the Ethics Commissioner for her planned events). She informed me that she had ‘stolen’ PMO Executive Assistant Dunerci Caceres from another posting to work for her. And the crew that came to the house to film and oversee our film dialogue day, were also from the PMO. When she began to exchange with me, it was clear that she did not operate with the decorum one would expect from a well-boundaried, adult member of government. For a moment, this was part of her charm, but it soon became clear that it had a chaotic, dangerous quality to it for a citizen. And that was confirmed by everything that has happened to my life since departing. She could have just said ‘Thank you for your service’ and let me go. But she wouldn’t. The Canadian people have a right to know every single detail of this. Not just what happened between us, but what happened to me after departing. Not simply because they are the ones who paid for the PM’s time in office and this information is fundamental to their democratic rights, but because so many of the individuals and systems that contributed to these falsehoods and injustices are intrinsic to a government that the people employ. In addition, Mrs. Trudeau’s strangely controlling and self-centered way of relating is remarkably similar to what the Nation is currently experiencing under Mark Carney. A situation where there appears to be respect for the people, but where there are in fact numerous steps being taken to destroy the economy, limit freedom of expression, and shatter the peace of hard-working Canadians. In other words, a situation where the people are treated with respect, only when they benefit those closest to power. (Tyranny always masquerades as benevolence.) In many ways, I believe that what I have endured is a kind of precursor or microcosm for what is now confronting the Nation. I also believe that this is all in the public interest, because the only way we will ever bring abuse of political power to an end is to break through our fears and anxieties and push all of their methodologies of destruction into awareness. I have a moral responsibility to share my story with my fellow Canadians. This great Nation and its people gave me a shot, and made it possible for me to achieve things often unimaginable in my childhood. The simple truth is that Canada is still one of the greatest countries in the world. It does not need to be made into a “post-national state” (Justin Trudeau’s words). It does not need to become the 51st state. It just needs to be restored and resurrected after 10+ years of neglect and abuse.
ENCOURAGING A FORMAL INVESTIGATION
I am also sharing it for my own protection, as a vulnerable citizen that has been under fire for some time since my efforts to depart from Mrs. Trudeau. Some of that clearly has to do with things that were shared with me, and things that I had contributed. But there is clearly more, given that the book is already out and contains those details, and yet the harassment continues. With all of that in mind, I continue to ask for a formal investigation into my story by credible law enforcement in Canada. With the illusion of “stalking Mrs. Trudeau” off the table, it is my hope that someone in the judiciary and/or law enforcement can finally initiate a formal investigation into my entire story. Not long ago, I left a detailed investigative request for York Regional police with respect to two significant sequences of events, and I have yet to hear back. That was months ago. As a consequence of sharing these details, it is my hope that they choose to respond.
I am also interested in an investigation into Sophie Trudeau’s possible role in various things. For example, whether she had knowledge of or involvement in a possiblly illegal passport ping on the trip we discussed in the audio, whether her request to connect/her assistant’s request for my address were illegal under the circumstances, whether there is an element of harassment in her continuous efforts to connect i.e. after my media interactions, whether her efforts to encourage me to remain connected are themselves illegal in a context where she is in a position of significant political power. There is a tort referenced as both Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) and Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress (NIED). Because I believe that someone in her position has an enhanced duty to behave responsibly vis a vis the public, are her actions congruent with the definitional aspects of those torts, especially when she starts mentioning ‘skeletons in the closet’ etc. possibly in an attempt to frighten me into remaining connected?
UPDATE OF MY LAWSUIT WITH THE TORONTO STAR FOR FAILING TO PUBLICLY REVEAL INFORMATION SHARED BY THE RCMP RE: JUSTIN TRUDEAU AND CHILD PORN. (Defence)
The Toronto Star has filed its defence in my lawsuit pertaining to the question of whether they had a responsibility to publish information to the effect that Justin Trudeau was watching “child porn” on his devices while Prime Minister. For those interested in following the case, a link to the filed defence is below. Among other things, the Toronto Star alleges:
-that I had reached out to Robert Cribb claiming that I had been subject to surveillance by “the RCMP”;
-that Robert Cribb did not tell me that the information about the Prime Minister came from the RCMP, but from a “Police source”;
-that Robert Cribb was researching the subject himself;
-and that Robert Cribb spoke to me because he believed I might possess relevant information about the “Police tip” to help him determine whether the information was accurate or credible (due to my connection to the Trudeau family).
Readers can review the complete filed defence and draw their own conclusions.
Link to my Amended Plaintiff's Claim
_______________________________________
The situation has been alive for a long time, and there is more to come. I am trying to focus my energies on the key elements of the story that linger. Speaking to the stalking allegations was essential, as is providing a complete list for the Canadian people of the various things that have been done to me by those protecting the Trudeau and Carney administrations in an effort to silence and contain me. In the Canada that I grew up in, this was probably unimaginable. But in a country where 40% of manufacturing is now planning to depart in the next two years, and record numbers of individuals are leaving permanently, nothing is a surprise. If you are interested in really knowing what is happening in Canada, here are some independent journalists and good folk to consider following:
Treasure yourself, Jeff
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.