Deep in the reaches of this document on page 255 / 274, you will find a shocking ruling that demonstrates how their intent is more about controlling perceptions than it is about public health and safety. These controlled perceptions are integral for maintain the river of profit that these pharmaceutical companies collect off of us, and how our own government protects them from liability
We also must remember that the vaccine act was passed in 1986 to give them full legal protection for their toxic injections, so this was just a pre-amble to that from the one organization that is supposed to protect us. This is what regulatory capture looks like, and it happened decades ago. The FDA gets half it’s budget from the pharmaceutical industry, so it’s clear who they’re really protecting - repeatedly proven criminal scum with a storied history of knowingly maiming and murdering people for profit.
FDA believes it is in the interest of the public health to make the amendment effective as soon as possible to make certain that questions concerning whether the vaccine lots used in the original clinical trials technically conformed with the requirements of the additional standards in 21 CFR 630.10 to 630.17 do not cast doubt on the safety of the vaccine and on the continued viability of the polio immunization program.
As noted above, oral poliovirus vaccine is the vaccine of choice in the United States. As a result of the use of the vaccine, cases of paralytic poliomyelitis have been reduced from 18,000 in 1953 to only 8 cases in 1983. Moreover, the several minor outbreaks of poliomyelitis arising in 1970,1972, and 1979 in unimmunized populations in the United States and abroad make clear that the immunization program is essential to the protection of the public health.
FDA emphasizes that the lots used in the clinical trials submitted in support of the license were properly judged to be safe for purposes of the initial licensure decision and that, in view of the technical nature of any possible deficiencies in the lots, FDA does not believe that action to revoke the license under § 601.5 is warranted.
However, although the continued availability of the vaccine may not be in immediate jeopardy, any possible doubts, whether or not well founded, about the safety of the vaccine cannot be allowed to exist in view of the need to assure that the vaccine will continue to be used to the maximum extent consistent with the nation’s public health objectives.
Accordingly, because of the importance of the vaccine and of maintaining public confidence in the immunization program that depends on it, good cause exists to issue these amendments as a final rule effective immediately. The fact that the amendment relieves a restriction also justifies making the rule effective immediately.
What they mean by “public health objectives”, is instead “protecting the profit of the business interests that we are captured by at the expense of the populace”.
The polio vaccine could be causing inordinate amounts of harm with undeniable evidence, and the FDA ruled that they will do everything they can to keep that out of public view to protect the PERCEPTION of it’s safety and efficacy.
Everything they do is always about perception, but never about objective truth. Anyone who has investigated and researched the history of vaccines and the criminal regulators and corporations that peddle them, should know exactly how far they’re willing to go to cover up harm and protect business interests above our health and the health of children.
Here are a few examples of this that I’ve covered.
Always remember, this is just what they’ve been caught doing.
The Wyeth (now Pfizer) DTP Vaccine Memo
·
August 6, 2023
This document should be considered substantial precedent in knowing just how far these corporations are willing to go in attempts to cover up and obfuscate the harm their products can cause. In this case, the harm was numerous cases of SIDS (sudden infant death syndrome) that happened in a cluster in Tennessee after use of the DTP vaccine made by Wyeth …
Vaccine Roulette: Quality Control, Contamination, and Negligence.
·
August 4, 2023
Currently the vaccine injury discussion has been largely argued under the context and understanding that what's on the inserts and excipient lists is what's actually in the vaccine in the disclosed amounts, assuming that the quality control procedures are of high quality and properly enforced (they're not). I want to add some important clarification to …
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.