The AI music industry is selling you two lies:
LIE #1: "AI will replace musicians"
(Fear-mongering from the Deezer study showing 97% of people can't tell AI music from human music)
LIE #2: "Just use AI to make music easier"
(Optimization culture that kills craft and turns you into an algorithm curator)
I've spent months testing AI music tools.
I documented the Grammy authenticity debates where the CEO calls AI a "threat" while Chance the Rapper shills for CoreWeave.
I analyzed why major labels are panicking over platforms that pay artists 82-100% instead of 16%. I watched Spotify selectively enforce AI rules while profiting from the chaos.
Here's what I learned: AI is infrastructure for amplification, not replacement.
But only if you understand the difference between:
Automating the mundane → Good (business tasks, technical analysis, admin work)
Automating the aesthetic → Creative death (letting AI "make music for you")
This article exists because the AI music conve…
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.