Last week someone pitched me a collaboration. Smart email, good idea, and I was ready to like them. So I did what everyone does before saying yes.
I Googled them.
Nothing. No newsletter, no posts, no product. The bio on their one social profile didn't even match the story in the email.
I didn't say no. I just never replied with the enthusiasm I had two minutes earlier, and they'll never know why.
When someone searches your name and finds nothing, they don't think "how mysterious." They quietly assume one of three things. You haven't done the work. You did it but never shipped it, which looks the same from the outside. Or you talk more than you build.
Maybe none of that is true about you. Doesn't matter. Checking a person takes ten seconds now, and an empty result gets read as a verdict.
You're being searched right now, by the way. A potential client. A podcast host choosing between two guests. A reader hovering over your paid tier. The opportunities that die at that search bar never send a rejection email.
Here's the newer problem, and almost nobody in our space is talking about it yet.
People have stopped Googling "best newsletter about X." They open ChatGPT or Perplexity and ask, "who's worth reading on X?" And the AI gives them three names. Not ten blue links to scroll past. Three names, stated with total confidence.
Those tools can only recommend what exists in public text. Your published archive is literally the raw material they learn from and cite. No archive means you're not buried on page two anymore. You're simply absent from the answer.
Try it. Ask ChatGPT who the go-to people are in your niche. If you're not in there, that's not an insult, it's an instruction.
The upside is that this game is still young. Most of your competitors have thin public footprints too. A year of consistent publishing under one clear name, on one topic, is enough to start showing up in AI answers while everyone else is still debating whether to start.
If your name currently returns nothing, human search or AI search, here's my honest 30-day version:
First, claim your ground. Your name or brand on a Substack URL, plus one social handle, plus a bio that says what you do in one plain sentence. Everything links back to one home.
Second, write one flagship post. Your best thinking on the problem you solve, deep enough that you'd happily send it instead of a sales call.
Then publish weekly. Not perfect posts, public ones. Both Google and AI models reward the same boring thing: the same name, the same topic, showing up again and again. A pattern is what makes strangers trust you, and it's also what makes machines associate a subject with your name.
Nobody can fake a two-year archive. That's the moat.
Fine. So am I, mostly. This isn't about sharing your breakfast or your feelings.
A post about how you'd solve a client's problem reveals nothing about your life and everything about your competence. Professional evidence, not personal exposure. That's the trade.
Two searches, five minutes.
Google your name plus what you do. Then ask an AI who's worth following in your niche.
Whatever comes back is your current first impression with every stranger who matters to your business, human or machine. If you don't like it, at least now you know exactly what the next 30 days are for.
Build something. Publish it. Make yourself findable in both places people actually look.
P.S. What comes up when you Google your name? One word in the comments: proud, embarrassed, or invisible.
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.