Anti-NS Fascist Cope

Responding to this article: https://substack.com/@fascistphilosopher/note/p-199012187?r=3yaesk

Some time ago, I posted an article titled National Socialism Contra Fascism where I went over the differences between the two, the conflation of names & why Fascism ultimately comes up short as a worldview. The main reason for that article was the very loose usage of the word Fascism as a catch-all for the various right-wing, authoritarian governments of the inter war period, which was mainly due to Marxist idealogues as the beginning of the “everything I don’t like is fascism” game. At the time, the main focus was just educational as too many people throw the term around. This article will instead focus on the elusive anti-NS Fascist that occasionally pops up in the depths of Xwitter or Discord.

The first few paragraphs of the article begin with semantic whining, like any good leftist. He makes the following claims here:

Quote:

“National Socialism requires the Jew in order to validate itself… a fundamentally evil figure against which everything else is defined.”

“The ideology therefore defines itself negatively. It does not begin with an independent conception of truth or virtue…”

“Ironically, this logic undermines its own moral framework. If behavior is supposedly determined by racial essence — by “blood” — then the Jew cannot even truly be considered morally evil in the traditional sense, because he would merely be acting according to his predetermined nature.”

Of course, none of this is actually backed up by anything meaningful besides the author’s ideological resentment (more on this later). Regardless, anyone who’s read a couple chapters of Mein Kampf can immediately tell the author is lying. The National Socialist worldview began with Germanic nationalism using the main racial sciences of the time. Rather than inheriting antisemitism from the traditional political movements, NS became antisemitic because of their Germanic nationalism & being a fundementally biological worldview. The author also contradicts himself by the time of third quotation as he hints at the positive definition of NS but doesn’t go deeper on the topic out of bad faith.

The third quotation is also remarkably dimwitted, it represents the author’s projection of his own beliefs & lack of understanding of the subject matter. National Socialism is downstream of Frederick Nietzsche’s philosophy & has no care for morality “in the traditional sense.” This point is the author projecting his religious beliefs onto something that doesn’t care about them, but claiming it counts as a sort of “gotcha.”

Later on, he repeatedly circles back to this argument.

Quote:

“This is also one of the fundamental differences between National Socialism and fascism. Fascism does not require a singular external enemy in order to justify itself. In the fascist conception of life, struggle itself is permanent and unavoidable. Existence itself is conflict.”

The author continues to posit that NS requires an outside enemy, a statement he attempts to give legitimacy to by stating it casually & giving it the look of being “common sense.” In reality, NS would continue along with the same worldview even if every non-Germanic race on earth suddenly went extinct. The only thing that changes is the exact limits of “good” or “bad” genetics. I’m sure everyone will remember that the NSDAP waged as much a war against the genetical unsound as they did against Jews.

The author’s treatment of the “fascist conception of life” is very typically disingenious. NS thinkers wrote virtually identical claims, from Rosenberg to Eggers. To show how retarded that statement is, I‘ll show you one of the most Hitler quotes from Mein Kampf.

“He who would live must fight. He who doesn’t wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle is the law of life, has not the right to exist.”

This belief isn’t unique at all, it can be traced back to Nietzsche & anyone who understands Darwinism (social or otherwise). Claiming this idea is unique to Italian Fascism is comically absurd. However, it’s more likely that the author tries to make this an abstract idea rather than tangible, physical truth, which ultimately makes it meaningless.

A pretty funny line from the article is this:

Quote:

“This also explains why many people historically became National Socialists rather than fascists or revolutionary syndicalists.”"

Actually, it’s because fascism & syndicalism are meme ideologies that only exist withn niche internet communities & historical footnotes. National Socialism carries on a century later because Hitler’s Germany accomplished far more than any other “fascist” type ideology & did so in half the time while under relentless pressure from other world governments. The old saying that “Mussolini made the trains run on time” is a saying because that’s essentially the most impressive feat of the NFP’s Italy.

Again the author circles back to previous point (this article could have been 3 paragraphs if he didn’t extend it by repeating ideas like a student trying to hit a minimum word count):

Quote:

“This is precisely where fascism fundamentally differs. Fascism does not believe that conflict can ever be permanently abolished through the destruction of a single enemy class, race, or group. Struggle is not a temporary condition caused by one corrupting force; it is an inseparable aspect of existence itself.”

Except it actually doesn’t differ at all, not a singular NS idealogue ever mentioned some utopian future of peace after the Jews were gone. It’s always stated as a specific step to help remedy the issues inside Europe by getting rid of the enemy within the gates. This is so laughably false that it could only be the author lying through his teeth.

The entire article is just repeating the same points already covered so there’s no point at continuing. The question we must ask is why the anti-NS fascist even exists.

In virtually every case, it boils down to said person being non-White or Christian. These people are fans of Starship Troopers & enjoy the edginess of calling themselves fascists but for some reason or another can’t be NS because of certain personal deficiencies. The only anti-NS fascist organization is the American Blackshirts Movement, which used to be a group made up of about a dozen hispanics & pushed a distinctly non-racist, Christian fascism. They were so non-racist back in the day that you could mistake them for a lefty group, using slogans like' “100% Nationalist, 0% Racist'“ alongside a picture of an Ethiopian soldier during Italy’s occupation of that country. They were similarly against antisemitism, but it seems the modern ABM has abandoned even this as their Xwitter has no such claims about racism or whatnot, but does include plenty of NS symbols & post showing Mein Kampf. Even they stopped with that strain of autism.

These anti-NS fascists are almost always deeply insecure about their ethnic or religious misgivings, & garner an extreme resentment against Hitler & other NatSocs for “ruining” fascism by association. They of course ignore the fact that most of the original fascists sided with the NS Germany, this includes everyone from Mussolini to Codreanu to Degrelle. They also become even more resentful when the fact that Germany under the NSDAP accomplished ten times more in half the time. They desperately cling to the political figures who betrayed Mussolini in the closing days of WWII.

They attempt to hide this resentment behind the NFP’s various philosophers (usually without understanding them) to give themselves an edge by being niche. This is nothing more than abstraction in order to come across as intelligent.

The conflict between National Socialist & fascists can be seen in 1934 when National Socialists killed Austrian fascist Englebert Dollfuss, the resulting civil war would be quelled by the entrance of Italian forces to support the government. In 1938, German tanks & Adolf Hitler crossed the border into Austria to the applause of hundreds of thousands while the Italians could do nothing. Dollfuss is now a forgotten footnote in Central European politics.

Hail Victory.