NASA's Worldwide Web of Lies

We’ve all met that person. The uncle at the family gathering who makes increasingly wild claims of his conquests and exploits, or the woman at the office seeking to top her previous story as she regals everyone with accounts of her life’s accomplishments. We’ve all experienced these kinds of people, and we all roll our eyes at their absurd stories because we know they’re not true.

But when a government agency with a twenty-five-billion-dollar annual budget is the arrogant blowhard with never-ending tales of impossible feats, somehow they get a pass.

I’m looking at you, NASA.

We listen to our common sense when someone we meet starts sharing stories that we detect are not true, but somehow we surrender our common sense and abandon our critical thinking when the lies are coming from NASA.

And they keep doing it because the wide-eyed masses continue to simp at NASA’s feet, believing and repeating everything that comes out of this government agency’s mouth regardless of how ridiculous it sounds to them, because . . . well . . . “science.” (You know, that thing we’ve been conditioned since birth to never question by those whose very jobs are in jeopardy if we do.)

You wouldn’t trust someone in your life that you caught lying to you repeatedly, but you continue trusting a government agency that does.

Why?

NASA dazzles its impetuous fan boys (and girls) with absolutely absurd and increasingly audacious claims. If we would pause long enough to give serious consideration to the implausibility of NASA’s braggadocios claims, we’d recognize how obviously dishonest they are.

Let’s chronicle a small sampling of the trickery NASA uses to deceive you and the insane claims that regularly defy logic and common sense.

Get a load of these headlines.

Did you know that the moon was affected by the government’s tyrannical Covid lockdowns?

I hope the government lockdown didn’t affect the dead dinosaurs on the moon and mars.

We spontaneously came to exist on our own, or maybe we came from aliens (anything but what Genesis says).

Oh, and did you know earth now has two moons?

Seriously.

And apparently our two moons brought friends.

We’ve never been there—and don’t even have a photograph of it (hence, NASA’s cartoons and CGI we’ve grown accustomed to)—but by golly, these experts claim they found a planet made of diamonds.

Is the science settled, or does it keep changing?

The current official narrative spoken from the booming voice of Scientism is that the sun is 93 million miles from earth, yet NASA claims to have sent a space probe as close as 3.8 million miles from the sun.

Don’t think about that claim too long or you’re liable to start asking questions like how materials, batteries, components, computers, motherboards, etc. could withstand the heat of the sun from less than 4 million miles away.

NASA tells us it was an “ideal distance from the Sun.” Close enough, in fact, “to study our Sun’s mysterious processes but not too close to become overwhelmed by the Sun’s heat and damaging radiation.” They even provide (yet another) computer generated image to dazzle you with.

Sure, NASA, whatever you say.

Not to be outdone by such an obviously absurd claim, Japan hopes to build a space elevator. Don’t think about the impossible logistics of this one either. Just look at the cartoon image below, say the magic word “science,” and clap like a trained seal awaiting its bucket of fish.

Of course NASA see’s Japans space elevator and raises them a levitating robot train on the moon.

Keeping people in perpetual fear is good for business, and it keeps the population in check, because the masses are willing to behave in all manner of ways contrary to their intuition and moral compass when they’re afraid.

Of course, like all government agencies with a financial stake in fear mongering, NASA can always be counted on to stoke the flames of fear in the masses. God may not have given Christians a spirit of fear, but NASA sure tries. After all, NASA has to justify their existence, and what better way to do so than to keep reminding the general public of how important NASA is in detecting threats to our existence?

The earth is slowing . . . no wait, it’s speeding up . . . no wait, it’s slowing . . . no, wait . . . it’s speeding up . . . no wait . . .

NASA is so smart, they even know the exact moment your progeny will die.

Every time we turn around NASA’s reminding us we’re all going die from some cosmic occurrence. The most common “threat” is from an asteroid collision with earth, just like what supposedly happened to the dinosaurs millions—or is it billions—of years ago.

Keeping you in perpetual fear is big business.

And when you realize how they describe the sizes of these alleged humanity-killing asteroids, you have to wonder if they’re not just mocking us (like with space elevators and moon trains).

So, dear reader, according to our illustrious experts at NASA, you need to be on the lookout for astroids the size of refrigerators and grand pianos.

Well, if that doesn’t terrify you, how about an asteroid the size of a house?

Still not scary enough? Then how about an asteroid the size of a car? A truck? A bus? A plane?

If those didn’t move the needle for you, surely an asteroid the size of a skyscraper, an aircraft carrier, or a football stadium will make you tremble in your boots.

Well, if none of those terrify you, NASA offers the mother of all collision fears—a comet the size of the entire city of Manhattan.

If you still think they’re not mocking us, you haven’t seen anything yet. Have you considered the utter devastation earth would succumb to if struck by a giraffe-sized asteroid?

Or the even more terrifying half-a-giraffe-sized asteroid?

Everyone knows lions are scarier than a giraffe, so how about an asteroid the size of 770 of them?

And for those people who have an irrational phobia of camels, NASA’s got you covered.

That’s a whole lot of camels, but they have nothing on 3,000,000 elephants.

At the risk of belaboring the point of this absurdity that passes as “science,” I’ll conclude with the one asteroid size that even strikes fear in me. The dreaded double whammy of the 22 penguins asteroids.

On a related note, have you ever wondered why every single crater is a direct hit on the earth’s surface, never striking at an angle?

Perhaps these craters weren’t caused by asteroids but are the result of water descending from the floodgates of heaven impacting the ground. Or maybe they’re the remains of the fountains of the great deep opening, just like the Bible tells us.

“In the six hundredth year of Noah’s life, in the second month, on the seventeenth day of the month, on this day all the fountains of the great deep split open, and the floodgates of the sky were opened.” Genesis 7:11

But you’re probably not ready for that conversation.

NASA has repeatedly been caught implementing the use of harnesses, wires, green screens, augmented reality, and even stop motion claymation in their effort to convince us that astronauts are floating around in space. It’s one of the reasons why they have a large-scale movie studio (named Big Easy Studios) at their Michoud Assembly Facility in New Orleans.

But even with all their money and resources, NASA still makes mistakes. NASA bloopers include bubbles in space, astronauts nearly drowning in space, a rodent on mars, a giant human head in space (next to the space shuttle), and zippers and gaps in space suits. You can see these any many more bloopers in the video NASA Lies, which I highly encourage you to watch after you finish this article.

If you’re truly an objective observer interested in truth, the following memes should provoke you to start asking questions.

Illogical design and construction.

The curious case of selective gravity.

Speaking of Santa hats . . .

Don’t you just hate uncooperative, pesky shadows that cause inconsistencies in light sources when you’re trying to convince the masses you’re really on Mars?

Speaking of fake images . . .

Strangely, one of the hardest things for some people to grasp is that a government agency with a multi-billion-dollar budget would (or could) produce false, doctored, and misleading content (exactly what we see in all the illustrations, artist’s conceptions, and computer generated images). Yet they can’t even produce a real photograph of Antarctica.

If what they’re showing us is real, why do they have to continually assure us it’s not animation?

These assurances sound eerily similar to what Elon Musk said regarding the Tesla floating in space: “You can tell it’s real because it looks so fake.”

Yet the general population, including awe-struck Space Christians, actually think Musk’s floating space car psyop is real.

In spite of the time and effort put into this Tesla stunt (encouraging star-gazers to keep their eyes and hopes fixed firmly on “science”), they completely missed (or ignored) the fact that the live feed glitched, revealing that the floating space car was fake after all.

Elon Musk certainly wasn’t lying when he said his Tesla in space “looks so fake.”

And what about earth itself? When you begin to critically compare images of the earth, you will begin to suspect something fishy is going on. Fishy like the use of fisheye lenses (also known as wide angle lenses).

You can see in this clip from CMS (China Manned Space Agency), how our horizon appears when a regular lens is used.

Now watch how a fisheye (wide angle) lens distorts the images you are seeing.

NASA’s wide-angle lens deception was in use as far back as the 1960s where it was implemented during the Gemini Missions.

Until you’re willing to objectively look into why NASA’s images of earth are a “composite of data sets from a bunch of different instruments” instead of actual photographs, you may not be truly ready for any of the following.

Truth is, we should have thousands upon thousands upon umpteen thousands of actual photographs of earth. Instead, we’re given computer generated images, composites, and cartoons.

We all believed—without question—that the images we’ve seen of earth from “outer space” were actual photographs because we trusted NASA and our school teachers. But we were also taught George Washington chopped down the cherry tree, the Civil War was fought over slavery, Iraq had WMDs, and evolution is true.

Have you ever heard of Rob Simmon, the Lead Data Visualizer and Information Designer for NASA? You should know about his admission—conceding that his famous Blue Marble image is “not a photograph, but a sophisticated visualization.” He even admitted this to NPR :

“It is Photoshopped, but it has to be.”

Images of earth have to be Photoshopped because, apparently, we can’t expect NASA (with a twenty-five billion dollar annual budget) to take actual photographs of earth, or have a real-time 24-hour video feed of earth from one of the thousands of satellites we’re told are orbiting above our heads.

Below is an excerpt from the transcript of the hosts of a 2012 NPR broadcast discussing how this image of the earth was created on a computer:

“. . . Rob Simmon, who’s one of the NASA people I talked to this week, created this sort of digital 2.0 version of the blue marble and that’s what I was talking about before. Where you had these different layers of data that are then translated into an image. And one of the funny things about this, I thought, was that—in that version anyway—the instrument, the satellite Terra, when they’re taking data, there are these gaps between the ribbons of sort of data that’s getting as it’s collected. So it’s like a little hole of data, basically, between each ribbon. So they had Photoshop in some clouds and stuff, which really seemed to bother him. But I mean, why, of course it would, but what are you going to do? So this is the new image that came out this week, which is just a snapshot, it’s not a full globe—doesn’t have any gaps. . . . But the good news is that the next blue marble, should there be one, will not be Photoshopped.”

Now let’s look at some eye-opening information that should cause you to reconsider what you’ve been taught your whole life.

Let’s look at the side-by-side images we’ve been provided over the years of earth that we’ve been led to believe were actual “photographs.”

Below we see North America has grown exceptionally larger in the span of five years, now taking up a considerable portion of the earth.

Either one is fake, or they’re both fake.

Here’s another visual example of what I like to call, spontaneous continental expansion. Look at that North American growth.

We’re told the earth is over 70% water, yet in the image below (from the Red Bull Stratos jump 24 miles up) the continents grew so large they now span the entire visible surface of the earth from horizon to horizon. Where did the oceans go?

And when you try to compare official earth “images’ with world maps, you see just how ridiculous they are.

Here’s another one. Take all the time you need.

You can’t ignore or gloss over this stuff.

Here’s a fun experiment I like to call Complete The Circle. Whenever you see an “image” of a portion of the earth supposedly from space—like this image of Manhattan—simply Complete The Circle.

“Wow, grandma, how large your New York City has gotten.”

Now Complete The Circle of the earth below (found in the middle of this image).

That one was a trick because obviously someone forgot to finish filling the earth in for some reason.

Even when using actual photographs and video from their low-orbit missions, NASA employs deception to distort the images.

Check out this alleged satellite image of California and Oregon fires from NASA’s own website. Pay particular attention to Lake Tahoe (I’ve included a red arrow pointing to it).

Now look at Lake Tahoe from this alleged satellite image.

And here’s another Lake Tahoe example. The lake got bigger and the oceans are still missing.

Having difficulty seeing the problem? Then just Complete The Circle.

If you’re not familiar with Lake Tahoe, check out this video of the lake and see if it even remotely matches the supposed satellite images above.

Here’s another fact to consider. The following image is from the 1972 Apollo 17 mission. I want you to examine it carefully. Not casually. Look at it critically.

If this was a real photo of earth, then cities such as Honolulu, San Francisco, New York, London, Moscow and Tokyo would all be simultaneously experiencing nighttime.

I’ve duplicated the same Apollo “image” using Google Earth below.

Out of curiosity, I asked the following question of AI:

Would there ever be a scenario where Hawaii, San Francisco, New York, London, Moscow and Tokyo would all simultaneously experience nighttime?

Here was the answer:

“No, there would never be a scenario where Hawaii, San Francisco, New York, London, Moscow, and Tokyo all simultaneously experience nighttime. This is due to the vast longitudinal span of these locations, which results in significant time differences. For example, when it is nighttime in Hawaii (late evening to early morning), it is already daytime in Tokyo, which is 19 hours ahead. Similarly, when it is nighttime in Tokyo, it is still daytime in New York and London, and even early morning in San Francisco and Hawaii. . . . while natural darkness—such as nighttime—occurs at different times across these cities due to their different longitudes, simultaneous darkness across all of them would require an extraordinary and unlikely event, such as a global-scale blackout or a planetary-scale atmospheric event.”

All the math-magicians in the world, with their convoluted formulas and mental gymnastics, cannot account for these impossible discrepancies. The images of earth provided by NASA simply do not stand up to scrutiny and would not be accepted as evidence in a court of law.

I don’t expect anyone to come to a paradigm-changing conclusion just from reading this article, but I would hope that your curiosity and suspicions have been piqued enough to make you want to ask questions and conduct your own research into this matter (with evidence not originating from people whose jobs rely on lying to you).

If they’re telling us the truth, why the composites, the CGI, the photographic and video manipulation, the green screens, the augmented reality, the wires, and the harnesses?

If they’re telling us the truth, why all the increasingly tall tales?

If they’re telling us the truth, why all the lies?

When we accept these lies, it shapes our worldview. And this is not harmless, because what we believe about earth, the cosmos, and their creation, influences our understanding of the God of this creation and how we interpret Scripture itself.

And regardless of what you think about “outer space,” every time your pastor regurgitates NASA’s talking points he’s not exegeting the Bible, he’s eisegeting it—adding his own interpretation to it. Whether intentionally or unintentionally, he is allowing his worldview—derived from proven liars who’ve devoted their lives to hiding God in evolution and the cosmos—to interpret the biblical texts and influence your understanding of God’s word. And that, my friends, is a dangerous position to hold because even a little leaven leavens the whole lump.

“In matters of faith and science I am more impressed by one evident reason or by one authoritative passage of Holy Scripture correctly understood than by the chorus of mankind. I am not ashamed to be convinced of truth. In fact, to have truth victorious over me I consider the most useful thing for me. But I never want to be defeated by the multitude. It may, indeed, be read in the sacred utterances that the multitude, as a rule, errs, and that very often one solitary man may put all the rest to flight.”

– William of Ockham

J.L. Pattison is a freelance writer and author of four contemporary speculative fiction books. His articles have been featured in such publications as Liberation Day, Predict, Koinonia, The Startup, The Writer’s Sanctuary, and The Writing Cooperative, and have also been featured at Mere Liberty, Doorway Publishing, and on Wretched TV.

Before you go, if you want to show your appreciation for this article and encourage J.L. Pattison to produce more content like this, then please share this article with family and friends on social media, and consider buying him a coffee.