The Harkle Family, 'Will They, Won't They?' UK Visit (No One Cares)

After 2 weeks of ridiculous PR articles in the tabloids, anyone who is sane would be sick and tired of the ‘will they come or won’t they?’ game played out in the public press. I didn’t want any part of this pathetic PR playground game that some journalists have been involved in, mainly the Liam Macguire’s WhatsApp group where he ‘leaks’ stories to Harkle friendly media outlets for some misleading PR.

The ‘Propaganda Pushers’, include Chris Ship ( ITV’s Shifty), Roya Nikkah (The Times) Victoria Ward (Daily Telegraph), Cameron Walker (GB News), and Matt Wilkinson (The Sun). All of them gave the game away (and looked foolish) by publishing the same information at the same time, using more or less the same wording.

Some claimed to have seen a TorchStone (Harold self commissioned) unverified report with claims that there had been threats made against Harold. Yes, it the same company that Harold has been paying for private security, where their personal body guard, Chris Sanchez is named as a Vice President of the said company, so it doesn’t say much about the company if they claim they cannot provide adequate protection for the Harkles. Shifty and Walker even ranted on ITV and GB News that the unsubstantiated terror threats were so dangerous (on 2 July 2026), and tried to campaign for Harold and his family to have RPO security. Again, they looked foolish because the reports were did not come from intelligence sources, and apparently it was based on alleged threats 7 months ago. It looked like another paid for ‘tactic’ to try and get RAVEC to give Harold IPP status because another fake car chase wouldn’t work, and staging a cult member as a stalker also failed earlier this year.

One minute they (TW and the faceless children) were coming, then they weren’t, then they might come after Harold was crying about it, but not to London, but instead they might go to Althorp for some Netflix filming. Yes, that Diana documentary that Netflix has might need some additional footage, and if Charles Spencer permits it, then he has betrayed his dead sister. Spencer is estranged from some of own children, and has recently remarried for the fourth time, but has always defended and protected his dead sister. If he permits filming of Diana’s grave, or any content to be created for financial gain, then surely he is a traitor to his sister and his family?

This new phase of PR tactics included putting out a non-story to try and build up public support and sympathy, to try and force RAVEC to give Harold the RPO security (IPP status) he claims he needs. It failed, as no one really cares if TW and the faceless children come to the UK— TW would be jeered at, and staged stooges would pose for hugs and photos, while the no one would see the faceless children.

Others planted stories claiming that it was all C3’s fault, and for once, in this case it isn’t. If Harold can come to the UK (as he has done half a dozen times this year) and be safe, then why isn’t it safe enough for TW? Some say C3 hasn’t seen the children since the Platinum Jubilee (Thursday, June 2, to Sunday, June 5, 2022), but there is no evidence to suggest the children had even been in the UK. A flight manifest for the return journey (they left early on 5 June 2022) did not list the children as passengers, and photos of the duo returning to California did not show any children came off the plane either. Put simply, if there had been a photo of C3 with the faceless children, then C3 would put it on display, and the Harkles would have milked it by now.

The whole thing was a farce, and as I flicked through the channels yesterday to get a weather update (there is an upcoming heatwave in the UK), I was subjected to stupid breaking news headlines stating that TW and the faceless children would not visit London with Harold. NO ONE CARES. GB News had it as a leading story, Sky highlighted the non-news, and even the BBC reported on it. It’s not even news as I highly doubted they would ever come, because can Invictus Games justify using funds for their travel expenses when they are under intense scrutiny? I believe they are still seeking sponsors with a year to go, but no one is interested as the games fall on the same weekend of the Wimbledon finals in 2027, the same as this year.

The only Harry that people are talking about is Harry Kane, as England prepare to play Mexico in the World Cup. As I walked through town, people were sitting outside having a drink, or eating ice cream and chatting. The only topics of conversation were the World Cup, the new Prime Minister, the heatwave, the fridges breaking down in Tesco and Sainsbury’s, and where to buy a bladeless fan. No one is interested in, or are even talking about the Harkles in real life (outside the small confines of the cult social media posts).

On 7th July 2026, the front pages will be about England in the World Cup and whether we won or not, and so no one will take a blind bit of notice of Harold arriving in the UK.

The main news this week will be the decision on the ANL case, that will be handed down on 7 July 2026, and by the looks of things, the Claimants will be liable for their own legal costs as well as ANL’s. In earlier case management hearings, the court (Judge Cook and Mr Justice Nicklin), took the unusual step of warning Claimants that the legal costs would likely exceed the amount the legal insurance would pay out, meaning that if the Claimant lost (which they suggested was probable with the lack of evidence presented) that they could face bankruptcy. This was to urge them to reconsider going to trial, and perhaps included it as it didn’t appear as if their lawyers were giving them the best advice available. Hugh Grant settled out of court a couple of years ago, and was advised that if he lost, or his damages were less than the amount offered in a settlement, then he would be liable for a £10 million legal bill. A lawyer needs to give their client the pros and cons of each option, but in Harold’s case he claimed it was never about the money (damages) but about holding the media to account for various historical articles

The Court allowed £4.1 million for the Claimants (around £570,0000 each) and £4.5 million for ANL, meaning that that if the Claimants did not succeed, then they must pay ANL’s costs. This is more of a guideline for costs to be recovered, as I imagine the legal bills incurred by all the Claimants already exceeds the £4.1 million, where they had suggested a combined total of £18.7 million between them.

Even if some of the Claimants win, they can only claim £4.1 million in legal fees between them, meaning even if Harold won, if his legal fees were over £570,000 (and I expect they were), then he would have to pay the difference in legal fees.

There is another issue, I recall Doreen Lawrence joined the lawsuit based on hearsay evidence from Harold, and it was reported that Harold had said he would cover her legal fees. What if he doesn’t pay them or can’t cover the legal fees, then what will Lawrence do? File for bankruptcy? Will Uncle EJ pay for everyone? Liz Hurley has a few million, Sadie Frost as ex-husbands who are millionaires, Simon Hughes may have some millions stashed under a mattress from his business ventures, but Doreen Lawrence was the wild card here (and used as a race card) as she is unlikely to have a few million spare for legal bills. Was it right for Harold to basically ‘mislead’ her into agreeing to be part of the lawsuit when she did not have the financial resources to pursue the weak historic claim?

As a source informed me a few weeks ago that the Harkles were seeking Chapter 11 advice, and that various entities were on the verge of seeking legal channels to recoup money owed to them from the Harkles. Was that when Harold was informed of the ANL decision? Apparently, the Harkles were already in mortgage arrears ( $160,000) earlier this year, and a source claimed that a UK charity cleared the arrears last month (how I believe it works is that X ‘donates’ funds to the said charitable entity (Y), and that entity then transfers the funds to Z for ‘marketing expenses’ or to another charity, and the origin of the funds cannot be traced).

Chapter 11, apparently doesn’t include private agreements in a restructuring, and it looks like that is what Archewell Philanthropies is all about, and is still in transition. Apparently some of the lawyers have not been paid (the restructuring is an expensive process $100,000 +). That would also mean that if there were private agreements to pay the medical bills of someone (say someone who had postpartum preeclampsia or a family member like Doria), then they could not make a claim for any further payments. The same goes for private verbal agreements, such as Harold promising to pay the legal fees for someone.

It looks as if Harold and TW have been dining out on their royal titles, and using them as collateral, just as Fergie did. She ended up in huge debt, and took money from Epstein to clear the debts in exchange for access to Andrew and her daughters, who then had access to royal properties that Epstein took advantage of

Then we should look at the old Glen Beg Foundation, where sources claim that it closed down due to Harold harassing the trustees to transfer the funds to Archewell or Travalyst. The charity closed down, transferring the funds to Children in Need in October 2025, promoted as a personal donation from Harold, but the charity had been used to award grants and donations to entities that had promoted the Harkles in back then. Why wasn’t funding coming from the Royal Foundation back in 2019, unless the Harkles knew it would be scrutinised?

In 2019, Jane Goodall got a mere £5,000 compared to Elephants without Borders who got £10,000, and where TW narrated a documentary back in March 2020. That explains why Goodall always gave them good PR whenever they were mentioned.

One25 (£25,000). 2 Feb 2019 , TW visited the charity for an apparent surprise visit, and wrote on a banana in a food parcel ‘you are loved/strong/brave’. The food parcels were for street sex workers.

Rhino Conservation Botswana (£10,000). Harold was the patron. After 2020, the UK branch charity failed to submit their accounts and was removed in 2022 from the Charity Commission register when the charity closed down.

Elephants Without Borders (£10,000). March 2020, TW narrated a Disney documentary, where the original narrator lost the job, but was still paid the fee as hush money.

Empire Fighting Chance (£10,000). A Bristol based charity that the duo visited in February 2019, for some PR.

Lewa Wildlife Conservancy, (£5,000 ). This is where Harold apparently took TW on holiday for her birthday in 2017.

The Jane Goodall Institute (£5,000 ). General schmoozing with Goodall vouching for them and posing for photos.

With Harold arriving in the UK for the Invictus Games one year to go event, the focus will be on the ANL decision, while the UK will be looking at a new Prime Minister (most probably Andy Burnham) next week. The Wimbledon semi-finals, and finals will be on when Harold will be promoting the Invictus Games, and the World Cup reaches the quarter-final stages, and no one will even notice Harold arriving or leaving. Was the ‘will they come or not’ PR tactic a way to deflect from the ANL decision, because the Propaganda Pushers were desperate to paint a picture of a distraught and tearful Harold, to try and gain the sympathy card? The relentless stories of ‘poor us’ fell on deaf ears across the UK, and it was clearly written for public consumption, in an attempt to influence RAVEC and to guilt trip C3. The question is whether C3 will meet with Harold and be seen as a weak King, and will C3 give Harold the cash to pay off the lawyers?