
Does Pakistan suck?
Pakistan wasn’t poor in the first Test, they were much worse
In cricket's footmarks.
Overdue Last read · last published · next check
Last read 4 days ago, longer than this feed's 1 day schedule.

Pakistan wasn’t poor in the first Test, they were much worse

England showed sentience in the post-Stokes era. Pakistan folded like origami veterans.

A Headingley mash-up of on-drives, irresistible Simon & Garfunkel callbacks, and a Pakistan kind of story for England.

Bangladesh have now won 100% of their Tests in Australia over the last 15 years. And Cricket Australia made that happen.

When three generations, two thigh pads, and a lifetime of memories came together in one moment for Jarrod and Ezekiel Kimber.

They've had a generation blessed with remarkable bowlers, but they're all of the same age and no one else has come through.

There really should have only been one Ian Botham, but England believed so much, they actually willed ‘the next Botham’ into reality. Twice.

Wolvaardt's cover drive belongs in the Louvre and her name in the pantheon of greats

Will practicality triumph where Bazball pyrotechnics failed?

Through its colourful history, the game has been built on cheats, sharp practice, and all sorts of dodgy reimaginings.

No one runs the game, we play too much cricket, and too little at the same time.

The aftermath of the five-man attacks is that we are seeing the death of the specialist number six, and the sacrifice of young batters at three.