The oldest way to make money in this business is to find a situation where the headline says one thing and the facts say another.
In January the FDA rejected a drug and the stock lost half its value in 3 weeks.
There were no safety deficiencies, efficacy deficiencies, or manufacturing deficiencies. The problem was a foil pouch that took too long to open and a film that some patients placed wrong. Science was never in question.
The market cannot tell the difference between a drug that failed and a package that failed. And THAT gap is where money gets made.
My friend Sam Kovacs did the work nobody else bothered to do:
There is no published approval rate for rejections like this one, so he built the dataset himself by hand.
This is what REAL research looks like. Not a narrative or stupid hot take.
Sam has been publishing this quality of work for free for two months. And on Saturday he finally launches his premium publication.
I highly suggest you check out his work:
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.