What do they have?

Dr. Sam Bailey put out a short video, via substack:

As usual, she walks us through a study - for a detailed rundown, see:

which doesn’t say what some would have you believe. The mice that died due to this scary new engineered virus with 80% mortality were euthanized by the researchers, not killed by a virus.

In response to a comment about viral transmission, I wrote the following:

No proof of transmission. Hard to prove when you don’t have a virus. They cover it up by labeling other conditions as viral.

• Annotated list of studies failing to demonstrate contagion: https://lordchewy.medium.com/exposing-the-contagion-myth-bf47cf0e3aee

No isolation unless you accept their 1984 version of the word isolation, i.e. doublespeak

No valid test because they have no 'thing' to test for. The PCR does not test for virus, it only indicates if a short sequence exists

No exponential growth in cases

All cause mortality tells us what is happening is caused by human decisions and activity, a virus would not know or respect a state/country boundary. Treatments and in many cases, care was withheld or denied.

No Gain of Function. We can't enhance the function of something that doesn't exist.

What do they have? Gain of Fiction. A story about germ feary.

If enough of us treat germ feary as a fairy tale, everything associated with it, most importantly, the quackcines, will all fall down.