It’s not AI slop.
It might be slop, it might not be slop. The question isn’t whether it was written by a carbon or silicon based intelligence or what combination was used to generate it. The question is “is it slop”.
If it’s slop, blame the human who shipped it. I don’t care whether they’re a poor thinker, a bad writer, or a prompter without taste - it’s slop and it’s their fault.
If it isn’t slop, why would you care the process by which valuable content was generated? If you need to carve it on a tablet, write it on papyrus, inconvenience a few electronics by sending an email or leverage an LLM to create it, I don’t care.
I don’t think it matters how things are created. I think it matters how good they are.
Founder: Gather.dev
P.S. Lots of great articles on the way. Been heads down with events in SF and NY, a new series of coaching and consulting offerings dropping next week for engineering leaders looking to scale AI adoption in engineering, and a plan for a community in a world where human communications will soon be intermediated by agents. Look for some drops at the weekend!
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.