Connecting the dots

Western mass media (that is media published in regions under the Western sphere of influence, which includes large parts of Asia and Africa) daily present a mixture of disasters, wars and conflicts with ever shifting focus, served in an entertainment fashion and without much depth. What they don’t do is help readers and viewers understand what is going on and why. Longstanding conflicts, such as Palestine, the Congo, Sudan, Taiwan etc., drift in an out of view. The menu is dictated by a few international news agencies and whilst the style of presentation and emphasis may differ, the stories running on a particular day are usually the same everywhere. You may live in South America or Africa yet the news of what is happening not very far from you comes to you filtered through London or New York offices.

The general tone is that the world is a bad place, that it is best you don’t get involved and instead retreat in to your consumer existence. If you want to make a difference, you can donate to charities who are anything but impartial and make sure your money does not reach the people you would really like to help, or you can vote for twiddly dee or twiddly dum. If you believe the media, one rogue president runs the world but there is hope, New York has just elected a Muslim mayor (sponsored by Soros) promising (like Blair did back then) that things will only get better. If you’re old enough, you will have learned that the only thing certain about politicians’ promises is that they rarely keep them. Elections in our so-called democracies are ring fights for the entertainment of the masses, but it is the masses who pay and the handlers who win. Should, on occasion, the people make an entirely wrong choice, then the agenda moves to regime change. The Venezuelan opposition leader even got a Nobel peace price for asking the United States to invade her country!

We are not meant to look behind the headlines or inspect the facts. We are not meant to ask Who benefits? or to follow the money. To do so would lead us to understand that we already have One World Government, that the Great Reset to establish the New World Order is well on the way and that He who pays the piper calls the tune. Almost all governments across the world are in debt. To whom? Who had more money to lend than all the nations of the world could gather? This is the question which leads to the greatest fraud in history: fractional reserve banking, where governments permitted private bankers to issue their money in return for tax revenue, usually to finance wars (it started with the Bank of England financing the King’s war against France). The interest on these loans is such that the capital can never be repaid and the population remains enslaved forever.

Interest, for this reason was forbidden in all monotheistic religions. The Jews changed the ruling to state that you may not charge interest against your brothers, but the gentiles are fair game; thus they specialised on money lending to the Goyim until Calvin also found a loophole for Christians, and lately the Gulf States invented Islamic Banking by calling interest another name and constructing technicalities to make the prohibited permissible, as if the prophet of Islam did not advocate for social justice.

Yet, interest is only half the story. What Jewish money lenders became particularly good at when they invented promissory notes (cheque money, now replaced by digital money) was to not only lend what wasn’t theirs (since traders who deposited gold and coinage with them were happy to use the paper promises and rarely demanded to be given back their deposits) but also what they didn’t have: for every pound they held (of other people’s money) they started lending two, then five, then ten. The economics term for it is fractional reserve banking. It became so bad that the gold standard by which currencies where backed had to be abolished and a nation’s currency was from then onward only backed by the capacity of its citizens to pay taxes. As this is also diminishing, seeing that artificial intelligence is replacing most jobs and there are fewer and fewer wage earners, a great financial reset is required, a kind of consolidation, where (paper) cash currency is entirely removed from circulation and government-controlled digital currency takes its place. Government-controlled, of course, means in reality controlled by those who lend to and control the government, and wages will be replaced by universal credits tied to compliance. If you hold the wrong opinions (though crimes) or even dare to express them (rebellion), you have lost the right to eat.

For a few decades we have been sleep-walking into this “brave new world”. We still think that we have a choice between brands, not realising that they are owned by the same multinational companies. We still think that we have a choice between different political parties, not realising that they are financed and controlled by the same bankers. The nuances differ but in essence those differences amount to very little.

The question of who benefits usually explains why wars and crises have been engineered in certain places and who is behind them. There is oil off the shores of Gaza; cobalt, copper, gold and diamonds in the Congo, oil, gold, copper, iron ore, chromium, manganese, and uranium in Sudan; oil and gas in Venezuela. The wars for resources, waged between the present-day super powers USA, China and Russia are usually fought through proxies whilst their masters sell the arms (in return for the goods), a lucrative business both ways except for the people who die. But in the mindset of greedy supremacists, people are dispensable; in fact, they are a problem. They (and cows) cause climate change and the death of the planet – nobody ever talks about the environmental impact of bombs and the war machine.

Thus the UAE, for example, has increased its gold holdings by 32% this year alone (and the year hasn’t come to an end yet) but does not have a single gold mine: the gold arrives from RSF-controlled territory in Sudan. Likewise, Jolani, the terrorist, was sponsored by the USA to hand Syria to Israel and rewarded with a new name and legitimacy as president al-Sharaa. In Surrendering Islam I have shown many years ago how the United States, following its victory in WW2, had a history of creating radical movements from remnants of Nazi operatives moved to Argentina and Egypt, in order to create conflict and then be able to intervene to establish a peace on their terms. From the Muslim Brotherhood through to al-Qaidah, ISIS and the RSF, the story is roughly the same.

Whilst the American Empire was busy in Iraq (oil) and Afghanistan (gas), China and Russia quietly established themselves in Africa, expelling the original colonial exploiting powers such as the British and the French. Now the American Empire has woken up to the fact that it is late to the show and wants to push them back. The apparently erratic policies of a vain-glorious president are anything but, they are the empire’s way of replacing soft power with brute force – both abroad and at home, in order to stave of an imminent collapse. The USA has military bases almost in every corner of the world and is prepared to activate them when convenient. The problem is, as amply demonstrated in between the Gaza jailbreak and the 12-day Israel-Iran war, that the Islamic resistance (and others, for example, in South America) have adopted an asymmetric method of warfare in which one of the poorest countries in the world, Yemen, can hold a super power to ransom and render its sophisticated aircraft carriers and other weaponry inconsequential.

Let’s not forget, however, that North America is not run by the people whose faces are shown on the media. Let’s also not forget that the same debt-finance system is equally established in Russia or China. Same piper, different tune. Traditionally, globalist Zionist banking families (some Jewish, such as the Rothschild, some not, such as the Rockefeller), have favoured Britain and America as their instruments of control. Whereas it is apparent that Israel is run by the USA, the USA in turn is run by Zionists, some favouring the religious Zionism of the current Israeli government, others favouring a secular “progressive” Zionism, like Soros. If “Isramerica” becomes a liability for them in their quest for total control of the world, they will let America retreat into isolation and back China instead. It will be much easier to compel people without the burdensome pretence of democracy. What we must not lose sight of is that those rival super powers are joint at the top and the apparent clash between them is another ring fight staged and directed by the same puppeteers. As president Maduro of Venezuela put it “Today, the dichotomy is between independence or being a colony, between slavery and freedom, between dignity and humiliation”. And this fight is now taking place everywhere, in every country, in every home. And history has always come out on the side of David against Goliath.