(Note to readers: I was researching the extent and type of correlation between low IQ individuals and child sexual predation when I thought of writing this essay).
A paradox of modern political psychology is the alarming rise of national leaders who display not only stunning rhetorical incoherence and serial self-contradiction but also a bizarre imperviousness to shame. Conventional wisdom assumes that high intelligence attributes like strategic foresight, verbal agility, and abstract reasoning are prerequisites for attaining and holding supreme power. Yet recent history reveals that leaders who possess shockingly low cognitive fluency and who are impervious to anything resembling truth can ascend to the highest offices. They need only be protected by powerful state apparatuses and oligarchic interests.
This essay argues that such individuals are not accidental failures of the system. Low IQ individuals are ideally suited to be catapulted to political power for a season by sophisticated elites. Their cognitive limitations, when paired with external protection, make them uniquely useful puppets.
High intelligence is marked by abstract reasoning, working memory, processing speed, sophisticated comprehension and use of words, and logical thinking. How many leaders in the Anglosphere display such traits today?
Observations of Plato and Machiavelli
This phenomenon is not new. It was anticipated centuries, even millennia ago. In The Republic, Plato describes the slow degradation of democracy into tyranny through the rise of a shameless, appetite-driven leader. He offers the famous “Ship of Fools” allegory. A ship has an owner and its compartments carry citizens. The sailors, representing politicians, all clamour for the helm. Each claims superior navigation. They plot, manipulate, and mutiny. They dismiss the one true navigator, the philosopher, or should I say thinker, as a useless stargazer. The ship is subsequently handed to the most cunning and persuasive crew member, not the most competent, who promptly sails it into disaster.
Plato then charts the psychological decay of such a man. His soul is ruled not by reason or honour but by base appetites. This is the ancient blueprint of the hollow vessel. He is hollowed out, easily controlled, and ultimately more enslaved than any citizen because he is captive to his own delusions and protectors.
Machiavelli, writing in the early sixteenth century, provided the cynical operational manual for the puppet’s handlers. In The Prince, he argues that most men are ungrateful, fickle, liars and covetous. This low view of human nature makes the puppet strategy viable. The ruler is advised to be both a lion to frighten wolves and a fox to recognise traps.
The vacuous figurehead however is a brittle lion, full of rage, grandiosity, and tantrums. The handlers are the foxes who set the traps and pull the strings. Most chillingly, Machiavelli warns that whoever makes another too powerful ends up ruining himself. This single observation captures the inevitable paranoia of the puppet and the constant vigilance required of the oligarchs who elevated him. They must keep him protected, blackmailed, and distracted. The moment he suspects his own power is borrowed, the arrangement begins to unravel.
Traits of a Puppet Ruler
For oligarchic or state sponsored networks seeking a figurehead, the ideal candidate should not be a brilliant strategist. Intelligence brings independence, long term planning, and the capacity to form alternative power bases. Instead, the ideal puppet exhibits several core traits.
First is shamelessness, an inability to feel or anticipate public humiliation.
Second is puffed up grandiosity, a tendency to make repeated self-aggrandising claims without the internal need for logical consistency.
Third is easy blackmailability, a willingness to perform odious acts as entry currency, binding themselves irreversibly to the circle. Compromission, the voluntary surrender of one’s own integrity, is the initiation ritual to the corridors of power.
Fourth is protectability, a dependence on the apparatus to manage reality because the leader cannot do so alone.
Fifth is relegation of agency. A low IQ leader will delegate urgent policy matters to his handlers lock, stock, and barrel. He will then claim the results as the product of his own genius.
Low IQ individuals, particularly those with co-occurring grandiose personality features, deliver all of the above in abundance.
Shamelessness as an Asset
Higher intelligence is tightly correlated with social metacognition, the ability to imagine how one is perceived by others and to feel anticipatory shame. A normal political actor avoids blatant self-contradiction because he knows that exposure will erode credibility. He loathes the whispered suspicion that he is not a master of his own destiny.
A low IQ individual does not experience his own statements as an integrated, coherent self. Each assertion exists in its immediate context. When a journalist plays back a previous contradictory statement, the low IQ leader feels no internal dissonance. He does not register being exposed. What observers call “thick skin” is actually a failure of social self-awareness. Instead of answering the question, he launches into a predictable insensate attack: “You are a horrible person,” “You should be ashamed of yourself,” or “You are fake news.” Again and again.
For the handlers, this is gold. A puppet who cannot be shamed cannot be forced to resign by scandal. He will simply deny, deflect, and repeat without the mental cost that would wear down a more intelligent and self-introspective person. The apparatus does not need to convince the leader to lie. The latter does so spontaneously and forgets spontaneously.
Brittle Grandiosity
The low IQ puppet almost invariably exhibits grandiose delusions. He will inevitably claim superiority over historic figures. He will demand absolute reverence and loyalty. He will turn every abject failure into a success story. To more intelligent segments of the public, this may resemble classic narcissistic personality disorder. But the internal architecture is somewhat different.
A high IQ narcissist constructs elaborate, internally consistent narratives of his own genius. These narratives may be distorted, but they have a logic. He can, when absolutely necessary, pivot to strategic humility because his grandiosity is flexible. The low IQ puppet cannot do this. His grandiosity is fragile, a fixed repertoire of simple, repetitive claims. He will say “I am the strongest,” “No one is smarter than me,” or “No one makes deals like me,” even when the record shows otherwise and is, in fact, hopelessly abysmal.
When reality contradicts him through a failed policy or an exposed lie, he does not recalibrate. He doubles down with even more absurd claims. Or retreats into incandescent rage. This fragility is precisely what handlers want. A puppet who cannot adapt cannot form independent alliances. He remains tethered to the apparatus that manages reality for him. The puppet’s tantrums may even be seen by his mentally challenged supporters as an act of genius. They will claim he is playing 3D chess even when their leader wonders why the Queen is the most powerful piece on the board and why the King is the most vulnerable. He just cannot see his reflection on the board. He only knows that the pawns (citizens) must be sacrificed.
Voluntary Blackmail
A recurring pattern in closed, powerful networks appears across intelligence agencies, organised criminal networks, and political arenas. Entry requires an act that society would find odious. This is not hazing for its own sake. It is a deliberate mechanism to create mutually assured destruction among insiders. Once you have performed the act, you can never fully leave. You are bound not by loyalty but by the shared possession of a collective noose.
The classic form of blackmail is imposed from above. A compromised individual is recruited because he already has a secret. But there exists a more insidious variant — voluntary blackmail, where the aspirant willingly performs a degrading, illegal, or grotesque act to prove he is fit for the circle. Or because he is hopelessly trapped by his own follies.
A high IQ individual approaching such a test will engage in strategic negotiation. He will calculate the long term costs and the benefits and drawbacks of being permanently blackmailable. He will seek alternative entry routes that do not require irreversible self-compromise. He will attempt to perform the minimum odious act necessary while preserving plausible deniability. Or, if he is extremely confident, he will perform the act but immediately begin building counter leverage against the circle’s leaders.
This is rational. But it is also a slow, hesitant, and detectable process. The gatekeepers sense the calculation. They know a high IQ recruit is thinking about how to escape the cage even as he enters it. The divergence in how these two types of candidates respond to such tests is stark:
The gatekeepers value the low IQ candidate precisely because he does not hesitate. Hesitation signals a future weak link, someone who might defect, confess, or negotiate with outsiders. The candidate who volunteers for self-compromise without flinching demonstrates several valuable traits. He shows the loyalty of the desperate, as he has nowhere else to go. He shows the stupidity of the reliable, as he is unlikely to outmanoeuvre the circle’s leaders later. He shows the shamelessness of the useful, as he can be sent to do other odious tasks without complaint.
Stupidity as Collateral
In standard blackmail, the blackmailer holds a secret over the victim. The victim resents the relationship. In voluntary blackmail, the victim, feeling trapped by his own moral and financial bankruptcies, may offer the secret as a down payment on belonging. The psychological difference is enormous. The low IQ individual experiences the heinous act not as a loss of dignity but as a transaction. “I performed the deed, now give me the keys to the office.”
Frustration naturally sets in when he is placed in a queue. There are many others ahead of him, in the manufactured opposition camp. Vested interests can only be maintained if all factions and parties are equally compromised. Over time, the quality of leadership deteriorates to the extent where governance resembles not a serious enterprise but a tawdry circus. Once again, we are seeing this pattern being manifested in the Anglosphere.
Moreover, the cognitive limitations of the elect prevent the kind of rumination that would make higher IQ individuals miserable. They do not lie awake replaying the odious act. They lie awake only raging against those who have affronted them. They are adults trapped in the psyche of juvenile delinquents. They frequently spew perceived injustices like “I am the most disrespected president in history.” They do not imagine hypothetical exposure scenarios. They do not plan escape routes. All of that mental energy is absent. Those niggling details can be left to their handlers. What remains is a simple, durable loyalty, not to an ideology but to the group that validated them.
Prioritising Low IQ Puppets
A powerful state or oligarchic interest recruiting a low IQ puppet does not want a partner. It wants a tool that cannot leave. There is no negotiation. The low IQ candidate does not bargain over terms. He simply complies behind closed doors. There is no moral hangover. He will not confess years later out of guilt, because guilt requires an internal moral map he largely lacks. There is no counter blackmail. He lacks the strategic cunning to gather damaging material on the circle’s leaders. Even if he accidentally witnesses something, he will not know how to weaponise it.
When the puppet outlives his usefulness, the circle can expose the hidden, execrable deeds or simply threaten to do so. The puppet cannot spin his way out because he lacks narrative intelligence.
These puppets and their families are also a source of revenue. They will hand over state secrets without a blink to their handlers in return for stock tips and unabashed insider trading. Family members and associates may buy select shares on the eve of a top-secret military campaign and make billions but that money will not buy freedom; only a small cut of the profits. A large chunk of it will be reinvested into projects from which the deep state and oligarchic interests desire a degree of separation.
Carousel of Low IQ Puppetry
No low IQ grandiosity, no shamelessness, and no voluntary blackmail can survive long in an environment where the electorate remains nominal stakeholders in the political process. The puppet’s contradictions would eventually reach a point of irredeemable liability, even when the “free press” and democratic guardrails are reduced to vestigial constructs.
A high IQ puppet understands that regime change is an act predetermined by puppet masters. In his final days in office, he will justify his policies and track record. He will appear gracious in conceding defeat or in handing over the reins of power. The low IQ puppet, by contrast, will not recognise that the outcome had been predetermined. He will rant and rage over “stolen elections” or how his replacement will ruin the nation.
This nefarious system works because oligarchic and state interests provide blanket insulation for all parties concerned. They also enjoy the freak show where their puppets, inserted into rival political camps, routinely tear into each other with the most egregious accusations.
This is facilitated by a friendly media ecosystem owned by the same vested interests. A party that punishes dissent, intelligence agencies that silence leaks, and financial networks that reward loyalty all work together. They create a bubble in which the puppet’s statements are never seriously challenged. Media outrage is highly curated. The puppet’s compromised past surfaces just enough to warn him to toe the line. All skeletons in the closet remain locked until the next regime takes over with an equally feckless and powerless leader.
Have you ever encountered a leader who promised that his opponent “will go to jail,” only to make a U-turn immediately after inauguration?
The Season Constraint
The reign of a puppet leader is seasonal. The same features that make a low IQ puppet useful also guarantee that his rule has a shelf life. There are several reasons behind this unspoken law.
Cognitive decay accelerates over time. Without external correction, the puppet’s statements become more bizarre, more self-contradictory, and more obviously detached from reality. Eventually, even a captured media system cannot fully suppress the absurdity.
Necessary allies cannot be alienated indefinitely. Brittle grandiosity repels competent administrators, military leaders, and foreign partners. The apparatus begins to lose talent and international credibility.
Blackmail will also lose potency over time. The rite de passage that bound the puppet to the circle may eventually leak, or the puppet may become so shameless that exposure no longer matters. At that point, the primary leash breaks.
Coup-proofing becomes impossible down the line. A low IQ leader cannot master the complex web of security services, patronage networks, and legislative coalitions required to purge his overlords. He is entirely dependent on his handlers. When those handlers decide a more competent or more compliant puppet is needed, the original figurehead is discarded. This happens at the end of his term or via constitutional fig leaves, forced resignation, or “health reasons.”
History suggests that the optimal window for a low IQ puppet is roughly one to two electoral terms. This provides enough time to shield oligarchic interests from public accountability but not so long that the decay becomes an oligarchic liability.
Systemic decay, however, can continue unchecked. The nation be damned. The puppets are there to ensure that power and money are concentrated in the hands of the few. This is precisely what is happening across the Anglosphere.
Conclusion
Low IQ is not a barrier to supreme political power. Under the right structural conditions, a protective oligarchic apparatus, a compliant media, a public habituated to contradiction, and an initiation ritual that binds the puppet through voluntary blackmail, collectively become an asset. The puppet’s shamelessness absorbs scandals that would destroy a normal leader. His decrepit grandiosity performs power without strategic independence. His easy embrace of abominable acts seals his irreversible loyalty. His complete dependence on handlers ensures compliance.
But the arrangement is inherently temporary. Reality, even when suppressed, has a way of leaking through. The same cognitive deficits that made the puppet useful eventually make him an embarrassment. And when that moment comes, the puppet who could never feel shame, who performed the entry act without hesitation, who claimed superiority over all historical figures, is quietly retired to a gilded irrelevance. The oligarchic system survives. The puppet does not.
Purchase a copy of my novel — The Electric Reckoning.
Share, restack or quote my posts.
No posts
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.