I was watching an excellent rendition of Paul Simon’s ‘You Can Call Me Al’ at the Albert Hall Proms when the news of the Executive Order broke on these shores. Incidentally ‘You Can Call Me Al’ is the name I gave to my Inaugural Lecture (lecture given for the general public) at Keele in 2013. The ‘live’ event featured Simon’s song along with Ray Parker Jr.’s Ghostbusters theme though Keele were too stingy to pay to allow them to be played on YouTube. Still, those were fun days at Keele and, surprisingly, YouTube has yet to ban the lecture!
I have digressed from what last night was an enjoyable coincidence and immediately upon reading the EO sent an email on the subject to my colleague in Paris, Dr Guillemette Crepeaux. Dr Crepeaux is probably the only serious scientist still researching the toxicity of aluminium adjuvants used in human vaccinations. If you have any currency to spare then please do send it in her direction, see post below.
Casualties of Integrity
·
November 28, 2022
Myriad scientists, medics and purveyors of truth have suffered the tyranny of covid. Many have lost their employment, their careers, their raison d’etre. My story, as recently told on The Highwire and in the Epoch Times, is a little different and I want to explain why.
.
My take on the new EO is somewhat different to what is being reported elsewhere.
I am looking at the major take home messages summarised in the image below and only one is likely to change anything in the longer term.
Only one of these eight recommendations has the possibility of irreversibility. A new broom, as will inevitably come at some point in the future, can sign another EO reversing all but one of these orders.
The only reason why the EO recommends the development of alternatives to aluminium adjuvants is because of an acceptance that aluminium adjuvants in vaccines are toxic and are responsible for myriad serious adverse events including death in vaccine recipients.
The World’s most powerful Government has decreed that aluminium is toxic in humans. Crikey!
You can be absolutely certain that this part of the EO was felt like an earthquake at the heart of the International Aluminium Industry. They have already gone into overdrive demanding that their ambassadors perpetrating medicine and science counter as strongly as possible the need for alternatives to aluminium adjuvants in vaccines. Here in the UK ‘the aluminium is safe’ advocates have a trusty ally in the BBC, always at the forefront of the propaganda machine.
Secretary Kennedy has convinced President Trump that aluminium is toxic in humans. The problem that Kennedy has now is in convincing those around him at Health and Human Services never mind the heads at the NIH, CDC and FDA. My recent experience is that these, not Trump, are the major hurdles to effective change. They may be simply ignorant and incapable of understanding the tyranny of human exposure to aluminium. They may be unwilling to accept that something that is integral to modern life actually underlies the epidemic of chronic ill health in the developed world. Personally, I think they are taking their advice with pieces of silver and it will take a gargantuan effort from Secretary Kennedy to bring this aspect of the Executive Order to fruition.
In the meantime, partial or even full implication of the remaining seven points of order will give an impression of success and fulfilling the objectives of MAHA. If these changes are not reversed then they are undoubtedly welcome. Unfortunately they are so easy to reverse that the medical/industrial complex will not be fretting about this Executive Order.
However, implementing a programme of research to develop alternatives to aluminium adjuvants in human vaccination will be a dagger to the heart of the International Aluminium Industry. A Presidential decree that aluminium is toxic in vaccines is a Presidential decree that aluminium is toxic in humans full stop.
C’mon Bobby. Change the world.
No posts

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.