Housing? B+ for Congress. Bigger Questions for Arkansas.

This housing bill proves something important: Congress can act when it wants to. The question is who gets their attention.

This week, Congress passed the 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act, one of the most significant housing bills to emerge from Washington in decades.

Leave a comment

Before we go further, let’s talk about what the bill actually does.

The legislation is designed to make housing more affordable by increasing the supply of homes, preserving existing affordable housing, supporting public housing modernization, expanding access to smaller mortgage loans, and limiting some forms of institutional investor activity in the single-family housing market.

In simple terms, Congress is trying to make it easier to build, preserve, and finance housing.

Representative French Hill played a role in helping move the legislation forward.

My grade of the bill as it stands now: B+.

That’s a good grade. Congress should earn more of them.

The bill contains several provisions that could make a real difference, particularly those that help preserve affordable housing and modernize aging public housing through programs like the Rental Assistance Demonstration program, known as RAD.

For housing authorities across Arkansas, those tools could help preserve affordable housing that might otherwise deteriorate or disappear altogether.

That’s important.

The bill also correctly identifies a major challenge facing the country. America needs more housing.

For years, we have built too few homes to meet demand. When there are too few homes and too many buyers, prices rise.

On that point, Congress is right.

But this is where the conversation becomes more complicated, especially for Arkansas.

The bill places significant emphasis on expanding access to small-dollar mortgages, which can help families purchase lower-cost homes.

That sounds good.

But a mortgage is only useful if there is a quality home available to purchase.

In many parts of Arkansas, particularly around Central Arkansas and other growing communities, homes priced under $100,000 are becoming increasingly difficult to find. Those that do exist often require substantial repairs, modernization, or rehabilitation before they are truly ready for a family.

Meanwhile, lower-priced housing is often more available in smaller communities and rural areas. But those communities may face a different challenge: fewer jobs, slower economic growth, longer commutes, and less access to healthcare, transportation, and other essential services.

That’s why housing affordability is about more than financing. It’s about opportunity.

For working families, the challenge is not simply getting approved for a mortgage.

The challenge is finding a quality home they can afford near a good job, a good school, a doctor’s office, a grocery store, and the services their family needs to thrive.

A mortgage does not create opportunity if opportunity is not nearby. That is where this bill falls short.

Not because it ignores housing. Because housing is only one piece of a larger puzzle.

The affordability crisis facing Arkansas families is not just about housing costs.

• It is about wages.

• It is about healthcare.

• It is about insurance premiums.

• It is about childcare.

• It is about transportation.

• It is about whether a family’s paycheck can keep up with the cost of living.

Housing cannot be separated from those realities.

There is another idea worth considering.

If Congress truly wants to expand homeownership, it should explore new tools that help working families overcome the largest barrier to buying a home: the upfront cost.

One possibility is a Homeownership Opportunity Bond Program.

Under such a program, the federal government could authorize tax-credit bonds that help generate down-payment and closing-cost assistance for first-time homebuyers and working families.

The assistance would remain tied to the property for a period of years, discouraging speculation while creating a revolving source of capital that could help future homebuyers as well.

The goal would not simply be to expand access to mortgages. The goal would be to expand access to homeownership.

Those are not always the same thing.

Which brings us back to the larger question.

This bill demonstrates that Congress can still come together around a serious problem.

It demonstrates that lawmakers like French Hill can help move bipartisan legislation.

But it also raises a fair question.

If Congress can act on housing, why has it struggled to show the same urgency on the broader affordability challenges facing Arkansas families?

• Why not healthcare costs?

• Why not rising insurance premiums?

• Why not childcare?

• Why not the everyday expenses that determine whether a family gets ahead or falls behind?

The 21st Century ROAD to Housing Act is a meaningful step forward.

It deserves credit for that.

But Arkansas families do not experience life one policy issue at a time.

They experience all of it at once.

• Housing.

• Healthcare.

• Food.

• Transportation.

• Childcare.

• Opportunity.

The ultimate test of any policy is not whether it passes Congress.

The ultimate test is whether it helps working families build stable, secure, and hopeful lives.

This bill moves us in that direction. But there is still a long way to go.

Blessings,
Chris