This morning, as I was tackling my to-do list at Starbucks, I remembered reading LinkedIn's Wikipedia page many years ago and being amused to see “oriented” in the first sentence.
Curious to see if it was still there, I googled “LinkedIn” and “oriented”, thinking it would immediately come up in the search results.
Instead, this pops up:
See what I mean?!
There is no escaping it!
🤷🏻♀️
But back to its Wikipedia page.
At the time of this writing, the first sentence does in fact say,
'LinkedIn (/lɪŋktˈɪn/) is an American business and employment-oriented social networking service used globally.
And per Archive.org, “oriented” has been in the first sentence for a long time.
Linkedin's 2014 Wikipedia page:
LinkedIn /ˌlɪŋkt.ˈɪn/ is a business-oriented social networking service.
In other words — no pun intended, get it? — LinkedIn has been oriented on Wikipedia for a good 12 years.
Fact #1:
In 2008, I used LinkedIn's InMail to contact Reid Hoffman about an ORIENTED LinkedIn partnership.
Reid never responded, but if I remember correctly, he did have a colleague reach out to me, and we did meet in person to discuss. I'll need to dig through old records for who it was that I met with.
Screenshot of my message (partial):
Looking back at what I had written to him in that message, I don't blame him for not responding. Lol…
Fact #2:
Three days after I reached out to Reid, I also messaged Scott Roberts.
Scott was LinkedIn's Senior Director of Business Development at the time.
He also didn't reply, at least not through Linkedin messages.
But the key thing to note is that - according to his LinkedIn profile - he too is oriented in his current position.
Fact #3:
Had they agreed to rope in ORIENTED, I was prepared to just give them the whole thing — my domain names and all — for basically nothing.
It was more important to me that the high-value network, which I worked so hard to create, could have the best chance for growth and sustainability — at a time when the ORIENTED Happy Hours were seriously hopping worldwide — than it was to make money from a sale. I felt strongly that LinkedIn had the resources to do it, and that it was very much a strategic fit.
But the person I met with said that a) ORIENTED members were likely already on LinkedIn, which was true, and b) we could just set up a private LinkedIn Group and utilize the community features there.
I couldn't get him (her?) to understand why a more integrated partnership with ORIENTED — via co-branding / platform integration / market segmentation — would be very advantageous to LinkedIn.
Writing this post is bringing back a sh**load of memories that I haven't thought about in almost 20 years!
The whole thing is so WILD, especially since I have a terrible memory!
Last but not least is this speech that I made with Linda Kong at a joint event with AAMA Silicon Valley when Kyung Yoon was at the helm (2007).
LinkedIn was referenced, as we clearly understood the strategic fit.
Ahh the memories…
Hmm. I wasn't planning to try and pitch to LinkedIn, as a lot has changed since then, and there are other companies for which ORIENTED.COM is better suited.
I'll think about it.

Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.