Exponential functions and Euler’s formula
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}\newcommand\Q{\mathbb{Q}}$
Math, anecdotes, recipes
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}\newcommand\Q{\mathbb{Q}}$
$\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}$
$\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}$
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}$
$\newcommand\F{\mathbb{F}}\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}\newcommand\tr{\operatorname{trace}}\newcommand\End{\operatorname{End}}$ The trace of a sqaure matrix $A$ is defined to be the sum of the elements along the diagonal. A basic fact is that for any invertible matrix $M$, \begin{equation}\tag{*} \tr(M^{-1}AM) = \tr(A). \end{equation}
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}$
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}\newcommand\C{\mathbb{C}}\newcommand\Z{\mathbb{Z}}$
$\newcommand\R{\mathbb{R}}$ $\newcommand\extV{\Lambda^nV^*}$ $\newcommand\extVo{\Lambda^nV^*\backslash\{0\}}$ $\newcommand\extT{\Lambda^nT^*M}$
$\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$ I’ve always disliked the standard definition of a manifold $M$ in differential geometry. First, the definition assumes that $M$ is a topological space. I don’t understand why this is needed. I prefer to show that the topology of $M$ is a natural consequence of the definition. Second, the definition always uses two technical terms, second countable and Hausdorff. I…
$\newcommand{\R}{\mathbb{R}}$