Right before one of his most critical legal tests, Andrew Tate has hit a procedural wall in federal court.
Attempting to challenge the 120-year-old Wright v. Henkel standard governing bail in international extradition cases, Andrew Tate’s legal team filed an unauthorized notice seeking to add approximately 150 pages of constitutional arguments after briefing had already closed. Federal Magistrate Judge Lauren Louis swiftly struck the filing for violating local court rules.
In this video, I break down why extradition proceedings carry a presumption against bail, what qualifies as a “special circumstance,” and why being a celebrity in solitary confinement doesn’t clear that bar.
Watch the full analysis above, and share your thoughts in the comments below.
Thanks for subscribing and sharing! Please consider upgrading your subscription for additional features.
— Dave, AKA Florida LawMan
Comments
Nothing yet. Say the first thing.
Sign in to join the conversation.