Automatized Knowledge Can Resist Bias
Habits, automatized knowledge and the subconscious can be a source of bias but can also resist bias.
Philosophy and Rationality Articles
Habits, automatized knowledge and the subconscious can be a source of bias but can also resist bias.
Indecisive arguments are illogical.
Recommended, not absolutely required.
TristanTrim wrote on LessWrong (link added): I dislike "argument" and "debate" as contexts for discussing discourse. As implied in Centola's book , more minds are changed by discourse than by debate. I know it's obtuse to use a phrase like "collaborative truth
Dennis Hackethal has been writing about Critical Fallibilism's (CF's) core ideas, on his Veritula website, but he doesn't name or credit CF or me. Instead, he claims the ideas were invented by Karl Popper and are part of Popper's philosophy, Critical Rationalism
Rational intellectuals should debate multiple times per year.
All rational public intellectuals should have debate policies.
Eli Goldratt is helpful for epistemology.
Critical Fallibilism's (CF's) concept of error correction mechanisms helps people deal with fallibility . Common approaches to fallibility allow arbitrary judgments without transparency , thus enabling bias . On the extreme other end of the spectrum is putting unbounded effort into handling fallibility: just keep trying to agree with
Criticism of induction and an alternative.
Evaluate success or failure frequently.
Popper discovered an alternative to induction.
Bringing up intuitions can be done rationally.
Many statements that contradict Critical Fallibilism are reasonable approximations.
Transparent debate policies are important.