
NHS goes "merchant of doubt" on vaping as an alternative to smoking
Sometime in July 2026, a small but significant change was made to the National Health Service (England) website on vaping. It has really disturbed me. Am I overreacting?
Tobacco and nicotine science, policy, and politics
Live Last read · last published · next check

Sometime in July 2026, a small but significant change was made to the National Health Service (England) website on vaping. It has really disturbed me. Am I overreacting?

The government's new proposals are based on a simplistic misunderstanding of youth vaping and casually trample over the needs of the much larger population of adult vapers and smokers.

The island nation of Palau and its backers are trying to have nicotine scheduled as a prohibited drug under the international illegal drug regime. What is going on?

The WHO uses World No Tobacco Day to attack far safer alternatives to smoking. It is an abusive disinformation operation that spreads doubt, protects the cigarette trade, and promotes organised crime.

In the perpetual contest for the dumbest public health conference declaration, the Europeans are going for gold.

There is no "right to vape", but property owners have the right to decide their vaping policy unless the government can justify overriding them. It has failed to make a case.

FDA's proposals to regulate flavored vapes exist in an imaginary world untethered from reality-based behaviors, real-world markets, and predictable unintended consequences of excessive regulation.

The anti-smoking measures are useless, the population at greatest risk has been ignored, and the anti-vaping measures will do more harm than good.

A new commentary in Nature Health sets out a bold but pragmatic agenda for addressing the global epidemic of smoking and related harms. Meanwhile a cautionary tale explains what can go wrong.

There are two ways to eliminate the tobacco industry: through competition (right) or through exclusion (wrong).